Rory
Closed Account
In a recent interview with Garry Nolan broadcast by Australia's 7News he recounts a memory of being:
Fast forward "about twenty years" and:
From: youtu.be/pSZUBulON6I?t=3073
In Diana Pasulka's book American Cosmic - where Nolan is given the pseudonym "James" - the telling is slightly different:
Whitley Strieber's, however, very famously does:
View attachment 54242
So I guess either Nolan's memory is playing tricks on him; Pasulka's account is awry; there's another version of the cover of Mack's book (and Nolan forgot to mention the bit about dropping it as soon as he saw the cover but rather said it was reading it that did the trick and "around twenty years later" can equal "around twenty-seven years later"); or perhaps Nolan isn't "James" after all; or something else.
Also worth noting: in both accounts he emphasises that he was awake (Pasulka: "He insisted that he was awake when these events took place, and he said emphatically, 'I was not asleep'") but in the interview he also says:
Though if we want to cut him some slack it's possible that this concession was referring only to his first "encounter", and that his assertions of being sure he was awake were based on the ones that followed.
(NB To most I imagine the most rational explanation is a combination of sleep paralysis, the natural weirdness of being a child, the vagaries of memory, and the narratives we create and the way they evolve over time.)
"probably six or seven [...] awake [and there were] little men in the bedroom. I knew they were there. I could see them."
Fast forward "about twenty years" and:
"I was at a used bookstore and I pulled out a book. And I'm pretty sure it was either John Mack's or Whitley Streiber's book [prompted by interviewer] Communion. And there on the front cover was - and I can feel the hair on my arms going up - was what I saw. And I remember I dropped the book because it was like: whoa. And it was a revelation, I guess.
From: youtu.be/pSZUBulON6I?t=3073
In Diana Pasulka's book American Cosmic - where Nolan is given the pseudonym "James" - the telling is slightly different:
So one of the problems there is that John Mack's book doesn't have a picture of an alien/"little person" on the cover:External Quote:An avid reader of science fiction, James picked up a book by Harvard researcher John Mack, Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens. James at first thought the book was fiction. He was shocked by what he read. The experiences of Mack's subjects were exactly like his own. They described night visitors who paralyzed them and seemed to watch them in their sleep. The beings also spoke to the subjects telepathically. By the end of the book, James realized he was reading what amounted to the story of his life.
Whitley Strieber's, however, very famously does:
View attachment 54242
So I guess either Nolan's memory is playing tricks on him; Pasulka's account is awry; there's another version of the cover of Mack's book (and Nolan forgot to mention the bit about dropping it as soon as he saw the cover but rather said it was reading it that did the trick and "around twenty years later" can equal "around twenty-seven years later"); or perhaps Nolan isn't "James" after all; or something else.
Also worth noting: in both accounts he emphasises that he was awake (Pasulka: "He insisted that he was awake when these events took place, and he said emphatically, 'I was not asleep'") but in the interview he also says:
"It could have been a dream."
Though if we want to cut him some slack it's possible that this concession was referring only to his first "encounter", and that his assertions of being sure he was awake were based on the ones that followed.
(NB To most I imagine the most rational explanation is a combination of sleep paralysis, the natural weirdness of being a child, the vagaries of memory, and the narratives we create and the way they evolve over time.)
Last edited: