Did NIST examine Steel from WTC7?

gerrycan

Banned
Banned
None of the WTC7 steel was examined, so this is all based on the construction drawings, a few "before" photos, and simulations/calculations.
Who says none of it was examined?
I see pictures of John Gross next to WTC 7 steel.
Did he just happen to be passing by it and get photographed ???
[...]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gerrycan

Banned
Banned
explain to me how you know that is from wtc 7. (before you answer, I know @Tony got the photo via FOIA)
http://www.consensus911.org/point-wtc7-6/
point 6 on the above page

ADD and Thank you David for your diligence
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
http://www.consensus911.org/point-wtc7-6/
point 6 on the above page

ADD and Thank you David for your diligence
your proof is an assertion without evidence from a Truther site?
 

gerrycan

Banned
Banned
I posted a pic of John Gross right next to WTC 7 steel. You deleted it.
How do you know that steel wasn't from around C79 ??

Justify the deletion, or debate it at least.

ADD Looks to the neutral observer like you are scared of that debate.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I posted a pic of John Gross right next to WTC 7 steel. You deleted it.
How do you know that steel wasn't from around C79 ??

Justify the deletion, or debate it at least.

ADD Looks to the neutral observer like you are scared of that debate.

It was off topic.
 

Oystein

Senior Member
apologizes to David.. I got my info off a truther site :(

View attachment 29116
For what it's worth: I kinda remember - but am only a felt 75% sure - that someone somewhere (JREF probably, but could be any other place) documented that this piece of "vaporized" steel Gross is touching in that photo is the very same piece of steel that the WPI team of Barnett, Biederman and Sisson (I hope I spell the names correctly) analysed for the FEMA report - the infamous "Appendix C", by simply comparing sizes, shapes and locations of features like the holes .

If true, this would indeed show that
A) Gross did examine WTC7 steel
B) This particular piece was retained - very possibly by Gross - for detailed metallurgical analysis.

The problem remains that, since the WTC7 steel wasn't marked, they could not determine where in the structure this specimen originated, and that renders any analysis of specimens rather useless when debating the individual fate of specified elements of the structure ("girder X on floor Y").


There is a question of jurisdiction here, too: What are the legitimate limits of the crime scene that would empower the state (police, state attorneys...) to keep citizens from entering and using their property? The Twin towers were attacked, and people were murdered there. The WTC7 was rather a collateral, accidental incident that led to property damage only, with the owner of the property being the only person, other than the state, to have standing legally. If the owner, in accordance with his insurers, decides he doesn't need to solve the specifics of the event, that redeveloping has a higher priority, which entity, based on what justification, could legally bind his hands and cordon off the property for a longer, possibly undetermined length of time?

Truthers, ask thyselves: If someone laid arson to your neighbor's house, killing multiple inhabitants, and your house suffered collateral damage, would you volunteer that you must not be allowed to repair, imhabit or even just enter your house for the next months, weeks, decades, until every last question about the original crime has been answered to absolutely everyone's satisfaction? I think you obviously would have standing to peruse your property MUCH sooner.

I know of course what Truthers will reply: That there was a deliberate, unlawful attack directed at WTC7, that therefore it is a crime scene in its own right. But that, quite frankly, is not in evidence, and never has been. The compliance of the insurers that payed out to Silverstein is perhaps the best evidence here: They have the standing, and hundreds of millions of good reasons, to suspect wrong doing. An insurance company that is faced with the prospect of paying out hundreds of millions of dollars will send its best people to the scene to figure put any possible and impossible way to avoid or restrict payout. if those people, every single one more qualified than the entire Truth Movement combined, don't smell a rat, then you can be pretty sure there is no rat.

Unless you expand the Grand Conspiracy Theory, by including the insurers, one leap further towards its Inflationary Limit, where the entire world population conspires against the poor TM.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
There is a question of jurisdiction here, too:
I think possible target of a terrorist attack qualifies. (ie the terrorists could well have planted bombs throughout the Trade Center, in addition to the plane attack). But I'm having a hard time determining what your jurisdiction idea has to do with the topic.

but am only a felt 75% sure - that someone somewhere (JREF probably, but could be any other place) documented that this piece of "vaporized" steel Gross is touching in that photo is the very same piece of steel that the WPI team of Barnett, Biederman and Sisson (I hope I spell the names correctly) analysed for the FEMA report - the infamous "Appendix C", by simply comparing sizes, shapes and locations of features like the holes .
thanks. I'll look to see if I can find such data anywhere.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
For what it's worth: I kinda remember - but am only a felt 75% sure - that someone somewhere (JREF probably, but could be any other place) documented that this piece of "vaporized" steel Gross is touching in that photo is the very same piece of steel that the WPI team of Barnett, Biederman and Sisson (I hope I spell the names correctly) analysed for the FEMA report - the infamous "Appendix C", by simply comparing sizes, shapes and locations of features like the holes .
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf

these two pics Truthers analyzed?
x.JPG
 

Redwood

Active Member
From NIST, a column identified as being from WTC 7. The problem with WTC 7 is that the steel pieces did not have unique markings, so identifying the location in the building it was from was impossible.WTC 7 Piece at Fresh Kills.jpg
 

Oystein

Senior Member
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Jedo How can we interpret witness reports of buckling? 9/11 5
Mick West Have You Actually READ the NIST Report on Building 7? 9/11 12
Mick West False Authority: "Thoughts From a Former NIST Employee" on 9/11 9/11 92
Truthful New published physics article points out NIST limitations and need for new investigation. Conspiracy Theories 3
Major_Tom Do Subpixel Video Measurements Reveal Errors in the NIST account of 9/11? 9/11 17
Playing Games AE911Truth To File LawsuitTo End FEMA/NIST Stonewalling 9/11 179
gerrycan AE911 Letter to Inspector General Claims NIST WTC7 Report is Provably False 9/11 161
Oxymoron Professional Witnesses Disagree With NIST i.e. Ladder 15 we've got two isolated pockets of fire. 9/11 57
Mick West Does NIST not testing for explosives and not testing WTC7 steel invalidate everything 9/11 246
hiper Did NIST lack focus? 9/11 8
Landru Did NIST lie and claim that the fires melted steel? 9/11 13
Mick West N.F.P.A. 921 - Did NIST disregard it in investigating 9/11? 9/11 60
lee h oswald WTC: Architects and Engineers, what percentage actually disagree with NIST? 9/11 9
Mick West Was the Steel Border Wall Prototype actually "Sawed Through?" Current Events 3
Mick West What Happens When You Burn Steel Wool? 9/11 15
Leifer Bent Steel In Building Fires Conspiracy Theories 1
Mick West Molten Steel in the Debris Pile, Cool Down Time? 9/11 51
Mick West How Hot Could The WTC7 Fires Burned, and How Hot could the Steel be? 9/11 2
SamBST Video of hot steel bending 9/11 43
MikeC Buckled steel from office tower fire 9/11 30
letrec Kinematic production of molten steel and its cooling rate 9/11 42
brucecam7 FEMA appendix C [unusually corroded steel] 9/11 43
jaydeehess Why little to no analysis of steel from WTC7? 9/11 45
Hitstirrer Effects of fire on the structural capabilities of steel structures 9/11 68
Mick West Nanothermite vs. Thermite/Thermate for Cutting Thick Steel 9/11 285
Mick West Debunked: Kids saying "Kite hit steel plane must" in class on 9/11 9/11 12
John Smith Kevin Ryan's Claims about UL certifying steel components for the WTC 9/11 32
muttkat WTC: The "dustification" of steel (Judy Wood's Theory) 9/11 50
Mick West Debunked: WTC: Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally. 9/11 444
J WTC: Molten Steel - Was there any? Why? What About the Hot Spots? 9/11 304
Mick West Man of Steel Contrails Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Related Articles































Related Articles

Top