Debunking Sites you Should Check First

Mick West

Staff member
There's something in software engineering called the DRY principle. Don't repeat yourself. Don't waste time debunking something if it's already been debunked. If you can just give a quote and a link, then you should do that. Not only does this save time, it also gets around the "why should I believe YOU" straw man attack.

Of course we have a bit of a problem in that many of the people you will be arguing against will not consider your source to be reputable. Even user-edited and well referenced sites like Wikipedia are thought to be suspicious. Snopes is questionable, and even the more "mainstream" conspiracy sites like Above Top Secret are not above suspicion.

There's no magic right way of doing this that's going to immediately convince everyone. This is a game of inches.

So what are my go-to web sites?


First of all, check if there something that pops up at the top of the google results. Search for "subject debunked", (e.g. 9/11 debunked) and you get and, which is pretty much all you need for a general debunking. You can extend this to a particular topic, like "no building collapsed due to fire 9/11 debunked", which takes you to the appropriate page: You can also use google to limit your search to one of the sites below, like

Google will also pop up links to a number of the following sites, and you'll probably arrive at the site's material via Google more often than going directly. But the following list still gives you a good idea of what google links to click on first.


Wikipedia is a great resource, usually giving a fairly detailed exposition of the theory, but also because of its insistence on all claims being backed up with citations, it gives you a lot of very well backed evidence. One area where it fails somewhat is that it does not consider blogs to be reputable sources, so often excludes them from a page, despite how interesting or relevant they might be. So for more niche topics, the most comprehensive debunking treatments might not be linked from the Wikipedia article.


Snopes is pretty light weight, but it covers a lot of topics. The focus is more on urban legends, and chain letters, so most of the articles there are just about debunking stories that your aunt might forward to everyone on her email list. But they do include some quite detailed debunkings of various things that are floating out there in conjunction with a larger conspiracy theory. Such as a supposed photo of Obama's Kenyan birth certificate.. Here several sources are given, but not linked.

Google will often give you a page that contains useful links to other pages that are now dead. This is particularly true for individual web sites and blogs set up to debunk a story anything over a few years ago. This site has a link to a story back from the pre-history of the chemtrail hoax. but if we try it in*/ , we get the full history of the page dating back to 1999.*/

If a web site no longer exists, then it's pretty safe to link to the archived version. However if a web site is still active, and they removed the material to hide it, then you want to make a local copy of the material, and preferably post (or fingerprint) it publicly as soon as possible. A web site owner can get all its prior material pulled from So keep that in mind. In general, you should ALWAYS keep a local copy of anything that you cite, just in case it vanishes from the web. Copyright law allows you to make reasonable copies of material for individual personal use. You can also quote sections of material under the fair use provisions.

The Skeptic's Dictionary

A very comprehensive list of skeptical topics and the nomenclature associated with them. Individual entries have a quick overview, and then usually several useful links.


An excellent list of bunk-like subjects, together with up-to-date links that provide the best debunking explanations of them.

Above Top Secret, etc.

AboveTopSecret.com_-_Conspiracy_Theories%2C_UFOs%2C_Paranormal%2C_Political_Madness%2C_and_other.jpgRather oddly, the conspiracy sites often contain some of the best debunking work available. Debunkers like to go there, as there are usually some easy pickings, but most of the debunking comes from the conspiracy theorists themselves. The more serious conspiracy theorists are wary of their topic being cast in a bad light by being associated with the more fringe topics. So if they see something that is obviously bunk (like, the WTC being destroyed by a directed energy weapon from space), then they are quite quick to debunk it. Since there's a wide range of participants on those forums, there is often a quite lively and extended discussion, where the salient points and real evidence will bubble to the surface. The true believers will remain convinced, but your strange bedfellow debunker will often do all the necessary work for you. Its also funny to be able to link to ATS as supporting evidence. Of course, the hard-core are convinced that ATS is COINTELPRO. Can't win 'em all.


Senior Member.
DO we have a debunking of Snopes being financed by Soros and all that? One of my FB aquaintances just posted one of those "WOW! Don't trust Snopes" articles.
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West offline - How to Preserve Good Debunking Sites? 9/11 3
Mick West Gabriel Sterling Debunking Trumps Accusations from the Raffernsperger Call Election 2020 3
Edward Current Needs Debunking: That the GPS does not implement time corrections from Einstein's relativity Science and Pseudoscience 7
A Needs Debunking: Proposed COVID Vaccine will become part of our DNA, make us programmable Coronavirus COVID-19 22
gtoffo Needs Debunking: "UFO crash" near Rio de Janeiro UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 17
Code-Beta Needs Debunking: CE-5, humans initiating UFO sightings UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Mick West Debunking Correlations Between 5G deployments and Coronavirus Coronavirus COVID-19 14
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
Mick West TFTRH #34 - Stian Arnesen: Debunking, Censorship, 9/11, and UFOs Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 0
H Need Debunking: Hernando County platforms from more than 10 miles Flat Earth 9
Bill Statler Needs debunking: "Magnetic water" for treating diabetes Health and Quackery 8
Mick West TFTRH #14: Rory – Flat Earth Debunking and Spiritual Journeys Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 6
Qulaey Two problems need help debunking and debating tips? please. Flat Earth 9
Scaramanga The Easy And Logical Debunking Of UFO 'Size' UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 1
Mendel MediaWise #IsThisLegit program Practical Debunking 1
brad fuller Does the inverse-square law apply to the flat-earth debunking tool chest? Flat Earth 4
mudr0 Need Debunking: Video claiming zigzaggin objects and movement prove EVA filmed in pool General Discussion 33
vooke Need debunking: Writings in the sky Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 11
Mick West Debunking 9/11 Microsphere Myths 9/11 0
Starman Debunking Bob Lazar's drawing of S-4 hangers UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 15
Mick West Debunking Guidelines for: "Convex Earth - The Documentary" Flat Earth 0
T Debunking needed – anomalous mp3 recording distortion UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 12
Mick West Here's to the "Debunker"! Practical Debunking 1
ConfusedHominid Need Debunking (Claim): Metabunk Curve Calculator Does Not Calculate for Angular Size Flat Earth 13
Mick West NY Times: In Italian Schools, Reading, Writing and Recognizing Fake News Practical Debunking 60
Mick West Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation Practical Debunking 5
Rory Where online is debunking most effective? Practical Debunking 14
Whitebeard Martymer 81 Practical Debunking 4
N Neeson's anti-debunking thoughts Site Feedback & News 15
Mick West Fireproof Cabbage, Burning Snow, Flat Earth - Are Some Things too Silly to Debunk? Practical Debunking 7
Mick West Burying the Debunk: How Fake News about "Pyramids" in Antarctica Creates False Balance UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 2
Sam Hill Debunking "That's not a Space Station, it's an airplane" Flat Earth 1
Mick West When Absence of Evidence is Evidence of Absence in Conspiracy Theories Practical Debunking 35
Rogerpenna Debunking Flat Earth with the Southern Hemisphere Flat Earth 11
Leifer Polite video interviewing/debunking Practical Debunking 8
Veronica! Any resources for debunking a 'cold case' UFO sighting? Practical Debunking 7
M Flat Earth theory simple debunking by the moon's appearance Flat Earth 48
mrfintoil Study: When Debunking Scientific Myths Fails (and When It Does Not) Practical Debunking 3
deirdre study on how to 'sway people' Practical Debunking 0
Leifer Pseudo debunking, trickery, product promos Health and Quackery 10
MikeG College Course on Conspiracies Practical Debunking 89
Leifer Harriet Hall, on debunking methods Practical Debunking 2
keefe Debunking guide Practical Debunking 3
Critical Thinker Why we debunk and who do we reach. Practical Debunking 2
G Needs debunking: Video of a solar eclipse is fake because we cannot see the moon covering the sun Flat Earth 5
Trigger Hippie Russian Troll Houses Practical Debunking 24
Mick West Finding the Original Source in a World of Aggregators, Shares, and Reposts Practical Debunking 32
David Ridlen Earth curvature refraction experiments - debunking flat/concave Earth Flat Earth 344
Mackdog Google to start debunking General Discussion 21
SabreSaint Need Debunking: CERN To Recreate Big Bang Science and Pseudoscience 26
Related Articles

Election 2020

Related Articles