I'm not sure that can be confidently stated. I think the angle of the tail section more resembles a MIG than the SU
But this is the first time that a MIG and not an SU has been mentioned in connection to the incident.
Nice find!Hello. I am from Russia and here it is what I found.
Pucture from right is a satellite photo from Russian News. Picture from left is a Google Earth photo for 28.08.2012. The same cloud after some years? NOWAY~
That is an option, Mick. On the Boeing 767 image someone has produced the following.
Not all those points seem solid (no contrails behind the plane doesn't prove it's not in flight for one) but the map photo showing fields with no change from 2012 (or 2002, it's not clear) is the simplest and most obvious debunk.
Ivan Adrievskiy, vice president of Russian Engineers Union, said: 'We see a photograph taken from space from a low orbit. Usually such images are taken for the sake of general reconnaissance of the air and the ground.
'The coordinates of the photograph mean we can suppose that the image was taken by an American or British satellite.
'We have studied this picture in detail and did not find any sign proving it to be fake.'
What is that a couple of bridges that were built after 2010?Another feature debunked ('cause this is kind of fun)...
Detail from claimed 'sat image' from July 17th.
This feature on July 16th.
The last time it looked like the claimed image.
Presumably damage from the battle at the end of May?The airport image (thin horizontal rectangle) is definitely post-2012 as the runways weren't finished before then
But what's weird on google earth is what looks like a wrecked plane in the parking area, between the images 4/28 and 6/19.
.
Thirty-four of the dead insurgents were Russian nationals and Donetsk insurgents claimed the bodies were returned to Russia.[30] It was later revealed the bodies were returned covertly to hide the fact that they were Russian, eventually ending up in a Rostov-on-Don morgue in the Russian Federation.[31]
Looks more like dams in a holding pond or reservoir?
It's not exactly logical that $100 billion on intelligence = they must have footage of the moment of attack.
First claim: what are the chances that a spy satellite would just happen to be in exactly the right position at exactly the right moment to take a photo of such an event? Pretty astronomically tiny! However large the US government spying budget is, they don't have a live view of the planet that they can just zoom in on any spot at any time. Spy satellites don't work like that.
By seems to be debunked, was agreeing it was probably fake. I wasn't claiming that google had faked pictures, I was asking whether that possibility shouldn't be considered. After all, Google Earth was a program named Keyhole until the CIA sold it to them and they are partnered with the CIA in Recorded Future.Their head agrees with the government that there should noI didn't come here to argue. privacy for anyone. I don't agree that it is improbable that we were keeping close watch on Ukraine.
