Debunked: this photo shows a Ukraine Mig-29 shot down MH17

Trailspotter

Senior Member.
Can you post translated sections of the article that describe where they got it?
The article is a transcript of the video. It says that the photos were attached to the following email, signed by a George Bilt:
Screen shot 2014-11-14 at 17.10.31.png

The presenter suggested that these photos possibly were taken by an American or British spy satellite.
 

Mackdog

Senior Member.
If they pumped cannon rounds into the cockpit and the cockpit fell off the plane, then why would they need to blow up the engine to cause it to crash?
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
On image is Su-27 and not MIG-29 how its said in article.

Su-27

I'm not sure that can be confidently stated. I think the angle of the tail section more resembles a MIG than the SU
upload_2014-11-15_7-37-0.png
upload_2014-11-15_7-36-18.png
But this is the first time that a MIG and not an SU has been mentioned in connection to the incident.
 

SergeyL

New Member
Hello. I am from Russia and here it is what I found.

Pucture from right is a satellite photo from Russian News. Picture from left is a Google Earth photo for 28.08.2012. The same cloud after some years? NOWAY~

 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
debunked by many people. See this blog for many evidences this is a fake by an amateur http://www.whathappenedtoflightmh17.com/proof-the-russian-tv-satellite-photo-of-mh17-is-fake/
Not all those points seem solid (no contrails behind the plane doesn't prove it's not in flight for one) but the map photo showing fields with no change from 2012 (or 2002, it's not clear) is the simplest and most obvious debunk.
I couldn't find the exact same image on google earth, the one closest resembling the pattern in one of the fields was a black and white photo from 2011. I think the yandex map may be an original image then not used by google, not sure how to check their image dates though.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
The airport image (thin horizontal rectangle) is definitely post-2012 as the runways weren't finished before then
But what's weird on google earth is what looks like a wrecked plane in the parking area, between the images 4/28 and 6/19.
Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at 10.56.48 am.png
.Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at 10.57.04 am.png
 
Last edited:

Mackdog

Senior Member.
Anyone else think the "missile trail" is a photoshopped airplane contrail..err..I mean chemtrail :eek:
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
From post #3: Photo of English-language transcript. (Paragraph three):

"...aiming right and sharp at the pilots' abdomen region." Nonsense. Their heads are the most obvious targets, through the windows.

On further reflection, one might wish to 'argue' that the "abdomen region" of the two pilots was guessed at...this type of accuracy is also not believable. In addition, in any case "IF" it is as claimed in that transcript? I.E., "(To silence killing them instantly - not even a scream)". Just wrong. People hit in that manner may well cry out in pain, and thus the CVR would have recorded it. Only way to NOT hear a pilot make a sound is when the main electrical power for the whole airplane is shut off, thus stopping the CVR recording capability.

So agree, this is a hoax.
 
Last edited:

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
:p
At least no-one official is endorsing this.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
The airport image (thin horizontal rectangle) is definitely post-2012 as the runways weren't finished before then
But what's weird on google earth is what looks like a wrecked plane in the parking area, between the images 4/28 and 6/19.
View attachment 10183
.View attachment 10182
Presumably damage from the battle at the end of May?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_Donetsk_Airport

That airport (which was only rebuilt a couple of years ago) has since been more or less completely destroyed by fighting.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...says-331-killed-month-s-ceasefire-agreed.html
 
Last edited:

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Well, maybe not so weird when you take it being an active warzone into account then. :)

 

Severed

New Member
Seems to be debunked. A couple of thoughts, the US spends almost a 100 billion dollars on intelligence, isn't it logical that unless they're only spying on the western world, that they would have genuine images of the shootdown? Also how reliable is Google Earth? This image has been out there for a while and the head of Google is very close to the US government, I've heard. Could the images simply be altered at google?
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Seems to be debunked. A couple of thoughts, the US spends almost a 100 billion dollars on intelligence, isn't it logical that unless they're only spying on the western world, that they would have genuine images of the shootdown? Also how reliable is Google Earth? This image has been out there for a while and the head of Google is very close to the US government, I've heard. Could the images simply be altered at google?
It's not exactly logical that $100 billion on intelligence = they must have footage of the moment of attack.

You'll have to flesh out your thinking a bit more on your second point. Reliable in what way? Why would google alter the images in google earth to include parts of the fake picture, and what does 'being close' to the US government mean exactly and why does it have any bearing on this fake?
The one conspiracy theory in regard to this that might have some merit is that it was an obvious fake put out to discredit the report it supposedly was in support of, but I don't really think it requires any effort like this to do that.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Seems to be debunked. A couple of thoughts, the US spends almost a 100 billion dollars on intelligence, isn't it logical that unless they're only spying on the western world, that they would have genuine images of the shootdown? Also how reliable is Google Earth? This image has been out there for a while and the head of Google is very close to the US government, I've heard. Could the images simply be altered at google?
First claim: what are the chances that a spy satellite would just happen to be in exactly the right position at exactly the right moment to take a photo of such an event? Pretty astronomically tiny! However large the US government spying budget is, they don't have a live view of the planet that they can just zoom in on any spot at any time. Spy satellites don't work like that.

As for the claim of altered images at Google. Well there is no evidence that it has been altered. And Google doesn't generate its own satellite imagery, of course. All the satellite images on Google Earth are from commercial image providers, and can be checked with the providers, so if anyone is doing the altering, it wouldn't be Google.

And there are plenty of other reasons it is fake. For one, the size of the plane is ridiculously huge. If you measure the plane on the image, then plug in the altitude of the satellite that took the image and the altitude of the plane, the airliner would have to be about two and a half miles long!
 
Last edited:

Severed

New Member
It's not exactly logical that $100 billion on intelligence = they must have footage of the moment of attack.

You'll have to flesh out your thinking a bit more on your second point. Reliable in what way? Why would google alter the images in google earth to include parts of the fake picture, and what does 'being close' to the US government mean exactly and why does it have any bearing on this fake?
The one conspiracy theory in regard to this that might have some merit is that it was an obvious fake put out to discredit the report it supposedly was in support of, but I don't really think it requires any effort like this to do that.
By seems to be debunked, was agreeing it was probably fake. I wasn't claiming that google had faked pictures, I was asking whether that possibility shouldn't be considered. After all, Google Earth was a program named Keyhole until the CIA sold it to them and they are partnered with the CIA in Recorded Future.Their head agrees with the government that there should noI didn't come here to argue. privacy for anyone. I don't agree that it is improbable that we were keeping close watch on Ukraine.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Joe Debunked: Iconic Charlottesville photo photoshopped; false flag Conspiracy Theories 29
deirdre Debunked: Blanketman photo proves Nice attack a false flag Conspiracy Theories 2
Z.W. Wolf Debunked - Photo of Hitler and Henry Ford Together [actually Wilhelm Frick] General Discussion 3
C Debunked: Boston bombing recovery photo makes no sense from medical point of view Conspiracy Theories 47
Mick West Debunked: Photo claiming to be Iraqi Chemical WMDs in Syria [Photo is actually in Utah] General Discussion 11
Mick West Debunked: Ghost Photo in Stony River Hotel, Okato, NZ [Light in Fridge] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 5
ddddddddd Debunked: Photo of '777' transported in jungle [Old 737] Flight MH370 2
Mick West Debunked: Hampton Court Ghost Photo [iPhone Panorama Glitch] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Mick West Debunked: Cooper/Copper family ghost photo UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 127
Mick West Debunked: "Official Photoshopping" of MH17 photo [Window cover physically removed] Flight MH17 7
Tobes Debunked: James Fetzer claims Shannon Hick's photo is "smoking gun" proof of a drill Sandy Hook 24
Mick West Debunked: "Partly Cloudy" 1990/2014 Photo Comparison [Actually 2011/2012] Contrails and Chemtrails 11
Svartbjørn Debunked: Orlando Roller Coaster Fatalities [Stock Fake Photo, Swedish Coaster] General Discussion 7
CapnPegleg Debunked: Photo of "Nessie" in Apple Maps Satellite image of Loch Ness [Boat] Science and Pseudoscience 16
Balance Debunked: MH370 Passenger Philip Wood sends Photo/Text from Diego Garcia [Fake EXIF GPS Data] Flight MH370 142
Mick West Debunked: Latoya Ammons Demon House Photo General Discussion 5
derwoodii Debunked: Supposed photo of Fukushima General Discussion 7
Mick West Debunked: Alien Base on the Moon, Triangle of Dots [photo artifact] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 56
Pete Tar Debunked: Soul Leaving Body Photo (Russian scientist Konstantin Korotkov) Science and Pseudoscience 18
Oxymoron Debunked: Dawn Hochsprung's photo used for witness of Boston Bombing [Hoax] Boston Marathon Bombings 2
Mick West Debunked: Coincidences. (Disney World Couple in Same Photo Before They Met) General Discussion 1
Mick West Debunked: Jesse Lewis in Obama Photo after Sandy Hook Sandy Hook 35
Mick West Debunked: Photo of James E Holmes at Occupy San Diego Conspiracy Theories 0
TWCobra Debunked: Photo of pilots protesting chemtrails - it's Photoshopped Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Mick West Debunked: Why In The World Are They Spraying - Wingtip Fuel Dump Photo Contrails and Chemtrails 26
U Debunked: Moon Landing and NASA Photo - non parallel shadows Conspiracy Theories 13
Mick West Debunked: Fake photo of triangle UFO and contrail Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Mick West Debunked aerial photo of wall street protestors General Discussion 20
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 2
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 13
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top