Debunked: The latest ISIS video of two Japanese men is a fake, shadows wrong [Perspective]

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Some people have suggested that the following video of the two Japanese hostages held by ISIS is fake.
Original video: https://ia902602.us.archive.org/13/items/msg_p/ms.mp4

The main evidence cited for this is shadows, where we can see the shadows on the faces of the hostages look like they are being lit from different sides (note where the shadow falls on the neck and shoulders). The shadows behind the hostages are also claimed to be wrong, with the shadows converging.


However, a brief experiment in replicating the video shows this is actually exactly what happens. The video is simply shot with a wide angle lens. The two hostages are angled slightly in to directly face the camera, which accounts for the face shadows, and shadows behind simply converge because of perspective.

Here's a video of me replicating the positions of the three men. Notice the direction of the shadow behind me:


And here's three frames composited from the same video. Notice the shadows on the neck and shoulders look like the light is coming from different directions, when there's only one light source here, the sun.

(Note: the ground I am standing on, and on which the shadows are cast, is perfectly flat, this makes the shadows longer than if they were cast on a slope).

Reducing it to the simplest level, here's a video of two objects. You can see they cast parallel shadows, but when viewed from the front the shadows converge.

A close up of the shadows in the ISIS video shows that they match the flapping of the clothing:


There's simply no indication of green screen or video compositing in this particular video. The fact that it's shot from two directions is further evidence that this video is genuine. And in this shot you can tell that the two hostages are looking slightly inwards, as they are looking directly at the camera. This accounts for the neck shadows, as seen above.


[Update]

My setup is not exactly the same as the hostage setup.

On flat ground, shadows will all converge at a single vanishing point. In my example, this point is behind the center me. In the hostage photo it's between the Jihadi and the hostage on the right.


Here's a 3D model


From above it looks something like this:


And varying the position of the sun:


[Update 1/29/2015]
Infowars attempted to duplicate this video in order to show it could have been faked. However their attempt only illustrates how if the ISIS video is fake, then there's nothing to distinguish it from a real video.



Compare the two videos with the hostage on the right

There are two obvious differences with the Infowars attempt - there are only faint washed out shadows (because they used multiple lights), and the hostage is not looking at the camera, because he is facing forward. The fact that he's not looking at the camera, and actually seems like he is looking in a totally different direction to the other hostage shows just how little they understand the role of perspective in the shadows.

And they didn't even attempt to cast shadows on the ground.

Bottom line, since there's nothing to indicate that the video is fake, so the simplest explanation is that it is real. While we can't prove a negative (you can't prove ANY video isn't fake), we can demonstrate there's zero evidence that it's fake, so why are people suggesting it is?



[This is a Summary Debunk, from material in the thread below, the original first post follows this post]
 
Last edited:

Fin

Member
At least one video is on YouTube and countless other people are claiming that the "strange" direction of the shadows on the men's faces proves multiple light sources. They also are saying the fuzzy edges around the men prove this has all been done in front of a green screen. Elsewhere on this forum there is a good thread about the moon shadows and how they have repeatedly been misunderstood. I'm wondering if a kind soul here can help me better explain to these people what is actually happening here.FB_IMG_1421958719612.jpg
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
If it's real (and the matching background from two angles seems to indicate it is) then I suspect the very high angle of the sun is what is causing problems. If they are facing the sun, and it's very high up, then turning slightly to one side or the other will make the shadow fall on that side.
 
Last edited:

MikeC

Closed Account
Yep - here's more saying it Haaretz, CBS

It looks like the 2 hostages may have had video taken at different times and/or places & they've been merged by ISIS - probably for "dramatic effect" - so doctored, but not actually "fake"
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I don't think that it's fake, it just looks like it was taken with a rather wide angle, they are facing the sun, but are angled inwards, towards the camera, so the shadows are on the side of the their faces towards the middle.

 

Mackdog

Senior Member.
Something does look strange about it to me..it almost looks like it could have been Photoshopped (the image above, not the video..I have not watched it yet). Like MikeC said, it could just be doctored by ISIS for some reason, but not fake...
 

Whitebeard

Senior Member.
It does seam to my eyes at least that the shadow of the guy on the right of the pic is casting is not pointing in the same direction as the other two figures. But with out knowledge of the exact time, and location the shot was taken at, and with out info on the details of the shoot (ie was there a reflective whiteboard or other light source off camera to the right, what lens was used etc) exactly what causes that odd shadow is anybody's guess.

I don't think its doctored, if you look at the video as linked to by Deirdre (linked again here) you'll notice at about 00:38 a gust of wind ripples the clothing on both the hostages and the ISIS guy at the same time so, it looks like the video is real.

The fuzzy edges don't look like green screen fuzz to me, just the result of a cheap video / camera phone, or the result of high compression.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
It does seam to my eyes at least that the shadow of the guy on the right of the pic is casting is not pointing in the same direction as the other two figures.

Here's a photo showing the same effect. Not having some spare people I used myself in all positions. Notice the shadows on the faces, neck and shoulder, and the shadows on the ground and trees behind seems to be going in different directions.


This animation shows that all three shots were taken at the same time. Just frames from this video:


It was shot with a wide angle zoom, about 11.5mm on my 7D, 1.6x multiplier, so equivalent to about 18mm on a 35mm SLR.

And here's the same again, on a cleaner piece of ground so you can see the shadows in the background go in "different" directions. In reality they are parallel, and it's just perspective. Again here we see the face and neck shadows exactly as in the ISIS video.


 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Given the explanation of the shadows, and the matching photos from different angles, I'm going to mark this one as debunked.
 

Svartbjørn

Senior Member.
Quick question... Is there a way to check if this is a green screen? I keep looking at the photos and the video and it's got that "Im standing in front of a backdrop" quality to it. This might explain the weird shadows and the other artifacts you guys are seeing... and it would explain why the still photo looks so off.
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
I just read on abovetopsecret.com that the government is now
cloning "Wests" to multiply their disinfo efforts to discredit CTs.
They had pictures and everything!!

Clones.png Clones 2.png
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Quick question... Is there a way to check if this is a green screen? I keep looking at the photos and the video and it's got that "Im standing in front of a backdrop" quality to it. This might explain the weird shadows and the other artifacts you guys are seeing... and it would explain why the still photo looks so off.

What exactly looks "off" about these?

 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Here's a close up of the shadows, showing the match the clothing flapping in the wind. Green-screen does not leave shadows.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Quick question... Is there a way to check if this is a green screen? I keep looking at the photos and the video and it's got that "Im standing in front of a backdrop" quality to it. This might explain the weird shadows and the other artifacts you guys are seeing... and it would explain why the still photo looks so off.
i think its like those HD tvs where everything looks too crisp and fake. the whole news footage from Sky News looks green screen to me, everyone in it. not just this desert footage.
 

Svartbjørn

Senior Member.
Honestly Im not sure how to describe it.. but this:

What exactly looks "off" about these?


Looks a lot like this



Im not sure if its the lighting thats throwing it off... or if the camera thats being used is different than what we're accustomed to seeing... For me, a good indicator of green screen are the borders around the actors are usually TOO crisp... As for your motion image.. The shadows may actually be falling on real ground (or on a set) while the green screen is further back to complete the image like this.. so it would explain a bit... and yes I know that sounds far fetched because its a LOT of work to go through for a hoax.. Im not offering it as a hypothesis, Im just trying to wrap my head around what Im seeing vs what the reality of the situation is.

On a personal note, itd be nice if it were faked because you wouldnt have two people being murdered (or having their lives threatened) out in the middle of the desert.. so maybe part of it is my just trying to find a reason for it to be faked.. who knows.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I've added a summary debunk above the OP.

Im not sure if its the lighting thats throwing it off... or if the camera thats being used is different than what we're accustomed to seeing... For me, a good indicator of green screen are the borders around the actors are usually TOO crisp...

It's just a dull background, brightly lit prisoners, and a high contrast video.
 

Whitebeard

Senior Member.
Here's a photo showing the same effect. Not having some spare people I used myself in all positions. Notice the shadows on the faces, neck and shoulder, and the shadows on the ground and trees behind seems to be going in different directions.

Yup, thanks for that, it's been a looooong time since I did any filming, but comparing your demo to the vid its enough to convince me its a natural effect. No whiteboard needed,
 

Mackdog

Senior Member.
What exactly looks "off" about these?

The top one looks normal, I agree with that, but the bottom pic just has a strange look to it for some reason. It may just be an optical illusion or something, but it also could be the angle the camera is pointing on the second one in comparison to the first one. Their faces look more bright in the second pic..

[edit] Looking at it again I can kind of see how it is different that the green screen pic svartbjorn posted. It looks like it is just the lighting.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
The top one looks normal, I agree with that, but the bottom pic just has a strange look to it for some reason. It may just be an optical illusion or something, but it also could be the angle the camera is pointing on the second one in comparison to the first one. Their faces look more bright in the second pic..

[edit] Looking at it again I can kind of see how it is different that the green screen pic svartbjorn posted. It looks like it is just the lighting.

The two views in the video were taken with different cameras, you are going to see different color balances between the two shots. Even with the same model camera, if it is auto-adjusting it can make things look different at different angles, due to lighting.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Some segments of the media are picking up the "fake" story, but seemingly just because of the "analysis" of Veryan Khan, a collator of information about terrorism (and not in any way, it seems, an expert on videos). She simply says the shadows seem to converge "unnaturally". But as seen above, it's perfectly normal.

Her comments are in the video embedded here.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/middle...tening-japanese-hostages-may-have-be-doctored
 

Mackdog

Senior Member.
I just thought of something that may be a discussion point in debunking this claim to others out there..If the US government/CIA/NWO/Mossad ect.. wanted to "fake" a video like this, then why would they need a green screen in the first place? Couldn't they just find a couple of Japanese guys, and a guy to wear a black mask over his face and hold a knife, then go out to the desert somewhere, like Nevada, California Utah ect..and film it there?? Or if its the Mossad, they are already pretty much in a desert..no need for a green screen there either.

Something to think about ;)
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
There's a range of theories here - the most mainstream is just that the video has been manipulated by ISIS for maximum propaganda. More extreme think the entire think is a fake by the Illuminati NWO types.

However the latter use the suspicions of the former as confirmation of their own suspicions.

While ISIS certainly seem to be mindful of the impact of their videos, and they do edit them, there's nothing to suggest this isn't what it appears to be.
 

Fin

Member
I have a feeling some people may find the bottom of the two (photos above) weird in some way partly due to the colors. The sky feels like it has too much yellow, the desert is more pale than the the usual sand color most westerners are used to, and add to that the garish orange suits and the non-reflective black and it makes for a harsh mixture of colors combining to give the background a feel of a postcard that's been left in the sun and faded somewhat. I think that may just be one of the factors that is prematurely leading some to the "fake" conclusion.
 

Whitebeard

Senior Member.
The sky feels like it has too much yellow, the desert is more pale than the the usual sand color most westerners are used to, and add to that the garish orange suits and the non-reflective black and it makes for a harsh mixture of colors combine to give the background a feel of a postcard that's been left in the sun and faded somewhat.

As it looks like a two camera shoot edited together, one camera dead in front and the other off to one side. If the two cameras (camera phones) were different makes, and / or the guys with the camera hadn't set the white balance your gonna get slight inconsistencies in the colour anyway.
 

Svartbjørn

Senior Member.
I have a feeling some people may find the bottom of the two (photos above) weird in some way partly due to the colors. The sky feels like it has too much yellow, the desert is more pale than the the usual sand color most westerners are used to, and add to that the garish orange suits and the non-reflective black and it makes for a harsh mixture of colors combining to give the background a feel of a postcard that's been left in the sun and faded somewhat. I think that may just be one of the factors that is prematurely leading some to the "fake" conclusion.

For me (having lived for quite a while in several deserts) it has more to do with the look of the individuals themselves more than the backdrop itself. Desert Skies, especially in the Middle East, look exactly like what you see in that picture.. as well as the sand/dirt itself. I think Mick hit the nail on the head (for me) that the Contrast settings for the camera were -really- bad, which caused the weird lighting effect that makes the pictures look faked or touched up.. or its possible that the contrast settings were changed in a program like Photoshop or windows pain etc, which caused the same effect (Id imagine to make identifying of the victims easier).

As for the public in general, yes I agree its most likely that they're used to seeing deserts depicted in movies like Sahara or Lawrence of Arabia.. big sweeping dunes of soft sand being blow into the air etc.. and not the baked/blackened hardened earth of Israel, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan.
 

JFDee

Senior Member.
It's probably worth to note that some of the impressions in the different shots are caused by their respective depth of field.

In the wide angle shot, foreground and background are well focussed, which is not hard to achieve with this optical setting and the brightness of the scenery.
However, it flattens the perceived space and makes it harder to imagine a 3D scenery (hence the difficulty to perceive the shadows as aligned). It's also 'not natural' - the human eye is used to shift focus from foreground to background, even in bright light.

In the side shot, there was obviously quite a bit of optical zoom involved, and the aperture was set to a small value (large opening).
This setting reduces the focused range so that the background is blurred - which is a commonly used effect for dramatization in photography, increasing the perceived space.

Both setups are somewhat 'exaggerated', lending a slightly artificial look to the video. However, the only immediate conclusion that can be drawn from this is that the camera operator was eager to get an impressive result, probably to please his superiors.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
However, the only immediate conclusion that can be drawn from this is that the camera operator was eager to get an impressive result, probably to please his superiors.
or.. ,like the rest of us, they cant figure out all these new 'settings' on hd cameras.
 

NoParty

Senior Member.
which is actually faked from this:

which is actually (horribly amateurishly) :oops: faked from this...

God, to think that grown people are convinced that this "fully confirms" their assertions...:(



p.s. I must add, though, that the gigantic yet pointless CIA logo added, presumably for
the slowest of learners, is a delightful touch...subtle as a flying mallet, as the phrase goes...
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
which is actually (horribly amateurishly) :oops: faked from this...

God, to think that grown people are convinced that this "fully confirms" their assertions...:(
I don't even see what the difference is whether they film outside or in a studio, or do the audio track seperately.

A hostage threat is a hostage threat. period.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Tim TheToolman Coles Debunked: Infowars: "Latest Climate Report Admits Chemtrails Exist" Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Rory Debunked: UK undertaker's claim that Covid vaccine is responsible for spike in deaths Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: 9/11 truth experts are knowledgeable professionals and their judgments are to be trusted 9/11 195
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosions preparatory to demolition of the WTC North Tower are visible as Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower 9/11 7
Mick West Debunked: Pfizer Developing a Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill, Taken Alongside Vaccines Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition “squib” is visible at top of WTC North Tower before Flight 11 crash 9/11 49
Marc Powell Debunked: Construction worker Philip Morelli experienced an explosion in the sub-basement of the North Tower 9/11 0
Marc Powell Debunked: ABC News correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported an explosion in the subway 9/11 1
Marc Powell Debunked: Debris from twin towers was projected upward by explosives 9/11 13
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Marc Powell Debunked: NIST computer simulation of Building 7 collapse is inaccurate 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: FEMA reported finding evidence that steel had melted. 9/11 47
Marc Powell Debunked: VP Dick Cheney ordered a standdown of jet fighters on 9/11 9/11 16
Oystein Debunked: Claim that Bobby McIlvaine's injuries ("lacerations") are best explained as result of glass shards and debris from bombs 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: World Trade Center should not have collapsed due to 9/11 fires 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Firefighter reports of secondary explosions 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Steel was hurled hundreds of feet by explosives 9/11 4
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition Explosion Before Collapse of South Tower 9/11 8
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosion in South Tower Lobby 9/11 7
Marc Powell Debunked: Mysterious Explosion Before the Flight 11 Crash 9/11 48
J.d.K Debunked: Marx: "The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions must give way... They must perish in the revolutionary Holocaust" Quotes Debunked 0
dimebag2 Poll : Which DOD Navy video do you consider debunked ? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 74
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 8
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 75
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs and Aliens 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs and Aliens 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 9
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: "Nancy Pelosi's long time Chief of Staff is a key executive at Dominion Voting" Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: Wisconsin Turnout 89% Impossible High [Actually 72%] Election 2020 1
Mick West Debunked: Video of Poll Worker "Filling In" Ballots. Election 2020 3
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top