Debunked: Podesta Received $35 million from Russia

MikeG

Senior Member.
Stone Cold Truth.png
A number of websites, led by Roger Stone, are claiming that former Clinton White House official John Podesta received $35 million from a Russian company while working for Hillary Clinton and president Obama.
https://stonecoldtruth.com/podesta-received-35-million-from-russia-while-advising-clinton-and-obama/

A careful examination of the facts, already made by a number of media outlets, reveals that Podesta received no such money and, although carefully skirting existing federal law, did not violate it.

According to the Stone Cold Truth website:

As usual, Stone went big with his headline and immediately backtracked in the text that followed it.

The “outlet” that Roger Stone’s website cites is none other than Breitbart, which published essentially the same story back in March of this year.
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017...etails-john-podesta-may-violated-federal-law/


Did Podesta receive $35 million dollars from a “Kremlin-financed company”?

Prior to joining the Obama administration, Podesta was on the board of Joule Unlimited Technologies from 2010 to 2014. Joule developed “commercial-scale production of ethanol made from carbon dioxide,” according to the McClatchy News Service.

During that time, Rusnano USA, the “Kremlin-financed company” Stone refers to, invested $35 million in Joule. Overall, Joule received approximately $200 million from outside investors. The parent company of Rusnano USA is JSC RUSNANO, which is a Russian state enterprise.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article109203877.html

So, Podesta never received $35 million dollars while he worked for Obama or Clinton. His company did when he was a board member, from another company that was controlled by the Russian government.


Did Podesta violate federal law by failing to disclose shares in Joule Unilimited Technologies?

The Huffington Post looked into this issue in March right after the Breitbart story.

Before leaving Joule in December 2014 to become a special advisor for the Obama administration, Podesta received 75,000 shares of common stock from the company, which he then transferred to Leonidio Holdings, a Delaware-based corporation managed by his daughter Megan Rouse.

Podesta never claimed these stocks on his disclosure forms (attached) because, according to federal law, he was a “new entrant” into federal service, even though he had served in Bill Clinton’s White House from 1993 to 2001. The Huffington Post even found the relevant statute (my emphasis):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...government-ethics_us_58d96696e4b0f805b32240d3

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2634.303


So, Podesta did not violate federal law. He is part of a larger problem in our country where former, high profile officials take advantage of the revolving door between government service and the corporate sector, and help shape the law to protect it.

Unethical? Probably. But not illegal and definitely not something with a $35 million personal payday.
 

Attachments

  • john-podesta-white-house-financial-disclosure-form.pdf
    791 KB · Views: 602

putneg

New Member
Hey eh, i know im new here, but how did you "debunk" anything? The screen cap of the article doesn't say it was illegal ( idgaf about reading the article), you admit he did receive 35 millions and WikiLeaks emails show he did directly receive them, through his company yes, but it's written black on white that he did get the shares, personally. Here :

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4635

The title you're debunking being, "Podesta Received $35 million from Russia". Let's look at your debunking:

1. Podesta was specifically mentionned as the benefactor as per Wikileak email proves.
2. It was 35 million $ in shares.
3. It was from a state owned Russian company.


So IDK what you proved here, that he tried to hide it by using a bunch of companies? How is that debunking anything? Is there something im missing here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
you admit he did receive 35 millions and WikiLeaks emails show he did directly receive them, through his company yes, but it's written black on white that he did get the shares, personally. Here :

He did not get the shares personally. He exercised some unrelated stock options. The meant he bought shares in Joule at a discount (a common form of executive compensation, vesting over time).

A company he was at benefited from a Russian investment. He probably benefitted a bit in the increase in value of his stock options. However that's totally different to simply getting $35 million.
 

putneg

New Member
Ah, yes, I understand better now relating to the stocks.

Still, he joined merely months (dec 2010) before the russia deal and "left" the moment this 4 years were done. I say "left" because the company never actually existed after 2012. Their website is down, there is no news about them since 2012. This is a bit weird from a company that received over 200m$ in investments (and the office was in a business park, lol). I guess no one cared that their 200m$ went up in smokes.


They did get the 35m$ russian money deal during his tenure, he did profit from it and he did send the money to himself through his daughter so I feel saying it's debunked isn't super accurate.The only debunked part is that it wasn't 35m to him but to the company he managed and profited from. The most important part, that he profited off russian investment in next gen energy production (if it wasn't just a money laundering front, which it looks like it is). I'm not saying he should be jailed for it, it's all legal, I'm just a bit weirded out that it is "debunked" when the important parts are true, which is more Russian investments in US energy sector. Which strategically cannot be good if that nation supposedly "stole the elections".

[off topic text removed]

So if title was "Podesta allow and profits from Russian investments in alternative energy then use loophole to be allowed in a government position" we would say it's true, right?

cheers
 
Last edited by a moderator:

deirdre

Senior Member.
I say "left" because the company never actually existed after 2012. Their website is down, there is no news about them since 2012. This is a bit weird from a company that received over 200m$ in investments (and the office was in a business park, lol). I guess no one cared that their 200m$ went up in smokes.
are you looking up the wrong company? it's Joule Unlimited.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
So if title was "Podesta allow and profits from Russian investments in alternative energy then use loophole to be allowed in a government position" we would say it's true, right?

Arguably. But this thread is about the claim that he received $35M from Russia. He did not, so that's it.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: Podesta's "Wet Works" Refers to Assassinations [Firing People & Other Unpopular Tasks] Conspiracy Theories 14
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 1
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 37
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: "Nancy Pelosi's long time Chief of Staff is a key executive at Dominion Voting" Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: Wisconsin Turnout 89% Impossible High [Actually 72%] Election 2020 1
Mick West Debunked: Video of Poll Worker "Filling In" Ballots. Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Obama called Michelle "Michael" in a speech. (Referring to Michael Mullen Jr) Quotes Debunked 0
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
novatron Debunked: California Wildfires Match the Exactly Path of the Proposed Rail System Wildfires 3
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
W Debunked: Qanon claims there have been 51k sealed indictments filed this year. Current Events 11
K Debunked: Audio of David Rockefeller "leaked" speech in 1991 [Audio Simulation] General Discussion 2
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Mick West Debunked: XYO Device Replacing GPS, Saving $2 Million a Day General Discussion 23
Mick West Debunked: "Tip Top" as a QAnon Clue from Trump [He's said it before] Conspiracy Theories 5
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Delta Lambda Compression General Discussion 16
MisterB Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
JFDee Debunked: Wernher von Braun confirmed that rockets can't leave earth Conspiracy Theories 23
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top