Debunked: Podesta Received $35 million from Russia

MikeG

Senior Member.
Stone Cold Truth.png
A number of websites, led by Roger Stone, are claiming that former Clinton White House official John Podesta received $35 million from a Russian company while working for Hillary Clinton and president Obama.
https://stonecoldtruth.com/podesta-received-35-million-from-russia-while-advising-clinton-and-obama/

A careful examination of the facts, already made by a number of media outlets, reveals that Podesta received no such money and, although carefully skirting existing federal law, did not violate it.

According to the Stone Cold Truth website:

As usual, Stone went big with his headline and immediately backtracked in the text that followed it.

The “outlet” that Roger Stone’s website cites is none other than Breitbart, which published essentially the same story back in March of this year.
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017...etails-john-podesta-may-violated-federal-law/


Did Podesta receive $35 million dollars from a “Kremlin-financed company”?

Prior to joining the Obama administration, Podesta was on the board of Joule Unlimited Technologies from 2010 to 2014. Joule developed “commercial-scale production of ethanol made from carbon dioxide,” according to the McClatchy News Service.

During that time, Rusnano USA, the “Kremlin-financed company” Stone refers to, invested $35 million in Joule. Overall, Joule received approximately $200 million from outside investors. The parent company of Rusnano USA is JSC RUSNANO, which is a Russian state enterprise.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article109203877.html

So, Podesta never received $35 million dollars while he worked for Obama or Clinton. His company did when he was a board member, from another company that was controlled by the Russian government.


Did Podesta violate federal law by failing to disclose shares in Joule Unilimited Technologies?

The Huffington Post looked into this issue in March right after the Breitbart story.

Before leaving Joule in December 2014 to become a special advisor for the Obama administration, Podesta received 75,000 shares of common stock from the company, which he then transferred to Leonidio Holdings, a Delaware-based corporation managed by his daughter Megan Rouse.

Podesta never claimed these stocks on his disclosure forms (attached) because, according to federal law, he was a “new entrant” into federal service, even though he had served in Bill Clinton’s White House from 1993 to 2001. The Huffington Post even found the relevant statute (my emphasis):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...government-ethics_us_58d96696e4b0f805b32240d3

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2634.303


So, Podesta did not violate federal law. He is part of a larger problem in our country where former, high profile officials take advantage of the revolving door between government service and the corporate sector, and help shape the law to protect it.

Unethical? Probably. But not illegal and definitely not something with a $35 million personal payday.
 

Attachments

  • john-podesta-white-house-financial-disclosure-form.pdf
    791 KB · Views: 779

putneg

New Member
Hey eh, i know im new here, but how did you "debunk" anything? The screen cap of the article doesn't say it was illegal ( idgaf about reading the article), you admit he did receive 35 millions and WikiLeaks emails show he did directly receive them, through his company yes, but it's written black on white that he did get the shares, personally. Here :

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4635

The title you're debunking being, "Podesta Received $35 million from Russia". Let's look at your debunking:

1. Podesta was specifically mentionned as the benefactor as per Wikileak email proves.
2. It was 35 million $ in shares.
3. It was from a state owned Russian company.


So IDK what you proved here, that he tried to hide it by using a bunch of companies? How is that debunking anything? Is there something im missing here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
you admit he did receive 35 millions and WikiLeaks emails show he did directly receive them, through his company yes, but it's written black on white that he did get the shares, personally. Here :

He did not get the shares personally. He exercised some unrelated stock options. The meant he bought shares in Joule at a discount (a common form of executive compensation, vesting over time).

A company he was at benefited from a Russian investment. He probably benefitted a bit in the increase in value of his stock options. However that's totally different to simply getting $35 million.
 

putneg

New Member
Ah, yes, I understand better now relating to the stocks.

Still, he joined merely months (dec 2010) before the russia deal and "left" the moment this 4 years were done. I say "left" because the company never actually existed after 2012. Their website is down, there is no news about them since 2012. This is a bit weird from a company that received over 200m$ in investments (and the office was in a business park, lol). I guess no one cared that their 200m$ went up in smokes.


They did get the 35m$ russian money deal during his tenure, he did profit from it and he did send the money to himself through his daughter so I feel saying it's debunked isn't super accurate.The only debunked part is that it wasn't 35m to him but to the company he managed and profited from. The most important part, that he profited off russian investment in next gen energy production (if it wasn't just a money laundering front, which it looks like it is). I'm not saying he should be jailed for it, it's all legal, I'm just a bit weirded out that it is "debunked" when the important parts are true, which is more Russian investments in US energy sector. Which strategically cannot be good if that nation supposedly "stole the elections".

[off topic text removed]

So if title was "Podesta allow and profits from Russian investments in alternative energy then use loophole to be allowed in a government position" we would say it's true, right?

cheers
 
Last edited by a moderator:

deirdre

Senior Member.
I say "left" because the company never actually existed after 2012. Their website is down, there is no news about them since 2012. This is a bit weird from a company that received over 200m$ in investments (and the office was in a business park, lol). I guess no one cared that their 200m$ went up in smokes.
are you looking up the wrong company? it's Joule Unlimited.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
So if title was "Podesta allow and profits from Russian investments in alternative energy then use loophole to be allowed in a government position" we would say it's true, right?

Arguably. But this thread is about the claim that he received $35M from Russia. He did not, so that's it.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: Podesta's "Wet Works" Refers to Assassinations [Firing People & Other Unpopular Tasks] Conspiracy Theories 14
Oystein Debunked: Gibraltar cancels Christmas Coronavirus COVID-19 5
Mythic Suns [Debunked] Viral internet meme indirectly claiming that Greenland has already fully melted. Science and Pseudoscience 6
T AiG Debunked: Fossils Fail to Find Major Transition From Dinosaurs to Birds Science and Pseudoscience 10
Rory Debunked: UK undertaker's claim that Covid vaccine is responsible for spike in deaths Coronavirus COVID-19 7
Marc Powell Debunked: 9/11 truth experts are knowledgeable professionals and their judgments are to be trusted 9/11 195
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosions preparatory to demolition of the WTC North Tower are visible as Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower 9/11 7
Mick West Debunked: Pfizer Developing a Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill, Taken Alongside Vaccines Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition “squib” is visible at top of WTC North Tower before Flight 11 crash 9/11 67
Marc Powell Debunked: Construction worker Philip Morelli experienced an explosion in the sub-basement of the North Tower 9/11 0
Marc Powell Debunked: ABC News correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported an explosion in the subway 9/11 1
Marc Powell Debunked: Debris from twin towers was projected upward by explosives 9/11 13
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Marc Powell Debunked: NIST computer simulation of Building 7 collapse is inaccurate 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: FEMA reported finding evidence that steel had melted. 9/11 47
Marc Powell Debunked: VP Dick Cheney ordered a standdown of jet fighters on 9/11 9/11 16
Oystein Debunked: Claim that Bobby McIlvaine's injuries ("lacerations") are best explained as result of glass shards and debris from bombs 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: World Trade Center should not have collapsed due to 9/11 fires 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Firefighter reports of secondary explosions 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Steel was hurled hundreds of feet by explosives 9/11 4
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition Explosion Before Collapse of South Tower 9/11 8
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosion in South Tower Lobby 9/11 7
Marc Powell Debunked: Mysterious Explosion Before the Flight 11 Crash 9/11 48
J.d.K Debunked: Marx: "The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions must give way... They must perish in the revolutionary Holocaust" Quotes Debunked 0
dimebag2 Poll : Which DOD Navy video do you consider debunked ? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 74
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 9
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 76
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs and Aliens 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs and Aliens 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 9
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top