Debunked: James Fetzer claims Shannon Hick's photo is "smoking gun" proof of a drill

Tobes

Member
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/0...ign=the-sandy-hook-smoking-gun-game-set-match

This article is about the famous photo where a group of kids were in a line, being evacuated from the school.

Here is that photo:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Photo-attributed-to-Shannon-Hicks1.jpg

Here is what Fetzer claims is a photo of the photographer taking the photo.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Photographer-taking-the-photo.jpg

Using the shadows in the photos, Fetzer is saying this is somehow proof that it was a drill. I'm not sure how he does it or how that proves anything.

Here is another photo that Fetzer claims proves his point:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Taken-at-945-AM-12-November-2012.png

Here is the conclusion he draws:

I don't know a lot about the shadow stuff. All I know is that if it were a drill, the government and the media would not have tried to pass it off as a real shooting. They do mass casualty drills all the time. I've read abut them in the news and I've known people who have been involved in them. They're never passed off as anything but a drill.
But if anyone here would like to debunk the claims about the photos, have at it.
 

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
Jim (or "James") Fetzer.

The site prohibitions prohibit me from explaining what I "really" think of Jim Fetzer.

Suffice to say...Jim Fetzer has advocated the "position" that no one died on 9/11 2001.

That "all" the people who died on that day were "sims".

"Nuff said about him.....
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
I don't know a lot about the shadow stuff. All I know is that if it were a drill, the government and the media would not have tried to pass it off as a real shooting. They do mass casualty drills all the time. I've read abut them in the news and I've known people who have been involved in them. They're never passed off as anything but a drill.
But if anyone here would like to debunk the claims about the photos, have at it.
I m not reading a Fetzer article because he never makes any sense. but I can tell you the 2 photos your referencing are not the same group of children. but you can already see that, so I'm not sure what to debunk

add: adding larger photos of the boys who are allegedly the same boy (in similar claims). They arent. different shirts, different pants, different shoes, different hair.

boy1.JPG


boy2ee.JPG

boys3.JPG
 
Last edited:

deirdre

Senior Member.
and Shannon Hicks never claimed to have only taken one photo. We have several of her photos that morning and she also took photos of the wounded coming out of the school but parents asked the Bee not to release them. ex:


dd.JPG


PDF linked below
we also have other pics of evacuating, heres a few of them:

10320537_801173866567062_6306810959477520086_n.jpg 1908296_801173666567082_3642282240572122612_n.jpg

f1122467-cb79-4364-a31a-3a045c3b3aef[1].jpg
 

Attachments

  • 00172274.pdf
    1.1 MB · Views: 548

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
It's basically utter nonsense. He's making some very rough estimates of shadow length and angle, and then pretending he can determine an exact date and time from that.

Using this photo:


Note the man on the far left is stood approximately on the base of the arrow, on the right corner. His shadow stretches to the right and reaches about to the start of the first diagonal line on the marked chevron area.

Now he uses the web site Find My Shadow to calculate angles and length multipliers. So I did the same:
http://www.findmyshadow.com/drawcha...ns=N&we=W&yr=2012&m=12&d=14&tz=-5.0&x=49&y=11



As you can see, Some time around 10 AM on Dec 14th puts the shadow in the right position - but really there's not enough resolution to be sure. Plus it's unclear exactly where his head is relative to his back foot. The writer claims the Dec 14th date is wrong due to the ratio of height to length being wrong, however he uses a specious value of the height, not accounting for stance and the view angle. He then claims that Nov 12th is a better day.

http://www.findmyshadow.com/drawcha...ns=N&we=W&yr=2012&m=11&d=12&tz=-5.0&x=49&y=11


So the angles don't really change, but the shadows at the same time are shorter. At 10AM on Dec 14th (the actual day) the shadow multiplier is 2.66, and on Nov 12th it's 2.00

But, reality check, how far is it from the bottom of the arrow to the first diagonal line?

16 feet. So if the multiplier were actually 2.138 as he "calculated", then the man on the left, who is not even at full height, would be 7.5 feet tall. So clearly Dec 14th is a far better fit than Nov 12th.
 
Last edited:

Keith Johnson

New Member
This gets a big thumbs up from me, Mick. I'm indebted to you and people like Deirdre who've done some great work on this website. I'll be referencing you, metabunk and this thread in my "debate" with Wolfgang Halbig, who has been referencing Hicks' photo as a (get this) basis for a lawsuit. That's tonight, July 24, between 8PM and 10PM Eastern. Here's details:

http://www.hotbuttondebates.com/upcoming/
 

Chew

Senior Member.
Fetzer is one of those maroons who threw his hat in with the 9/11 nuke crowd. He said certain elements found in the dust can only come from a nuke.

Among his words:
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.

Apparently he blindly accepted the word of another kook. Even more apparently, he didn't realize those numbers can actually be used to determine the yield of a nuke if in fact they came from a nuke. For example, two isotopes of strontium are produced by the fission of uranium: Sr-89 and Sr-90. One megaton of fission will produce 1441 grams of Sr-89+90. 700 ppm in 600,000 tonnes of dust has a mass of 420 million grams. To produce that much strontium via nuclear fission would require a yield of 291,000 megatons. That is over 5800 times the yield of Tsar Bomba, the largest nuclear weapon ever detonated.

See Table 9 for production of fission products:
http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/annexc.pdf
 

Hevach

Senior Member.
Because playing with Nukemap is fun, this is what that 291 gigaton bomb would look like:
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/classic/?lat=40.72422&lng=-73.99610000000001&zm=4&kt=291000000

The zone of total destruction would reach from Maine to Washington DC, and firestorms would extend evelop most of the eastern US and massive swaths of Canada. The death toll would be in the tens of millions.


Edit: While playing with Nukemap, I found out that even though Nukemap 2 (which can project casualties) won't accept absurd inputs like 291,000,000 kilotons, the URL can be manipulated to produce them anyway:
 
Last edited:

Efftup

Senior Member.
Because playing with Nukemap is fun, this is what that 291 gigaton bomb would look like:
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/classic/?lat=40.72422&lng=-73.99610000000001&zm=4&kt=291000000

The zone of total destruction would reach from Maine to Washington DC, and firestorms would extend evelop most of the eastern US and massive swaths of Canada. The death toll would be in the tens of millions.


Edit: While playing with Nukemap, I found out that even though Nukemap 2 (which can project casualties) won't accept absurd inputs like 291,000,000 kilotons, the URL can be manipulated to produce them anyway:
Nukemap is GREAt fun. if you detonated that nuke a few miles West of Lincoln Nebraska you would burn nearly everyone in the USA, (including all of New York and Los Angeles) as well as nearly everyone in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario.
Stick it on London and you give nearly everyone in Europe nasty burns.
 

Tobes

Member
This gets a big thumbs up from me, Mick. I'm indebted to you and people like Deirdre who've done some great work on this website. I'll be referencing you, metabunk and this thread in my "debate" with Wolfgang Halbig, who has been referencing Hicks' photo as a (get this) basis for a lawsuit. That's tonight, July 24, between 8PM and 10PM Eastern. Here's details:

[URL='http://www.hotbuttondebates.com/upcoming/[/QUOTE']http://www.hotbuttondebates.com/upcoming/[/QUOTE[/URL]]


Why debate these people? There's nothing to debate.
 

Efftup

Senior Member.
Just like a high school debating class, as ong as you can convince people by arguing well, you can "win" a debate, even if you know damn well you are talking complete bunk. so this suits hoaxers well.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Just like a high school debating class, as ong as you can convince people by arguing well, you can "win" a debate, even if you know damn well you are talking complete bunk. so this suits hoaxers well.
: ) you've obviously never heard the hoaxers 'debate'.
 

Efftup

Senior Member.
oh I have. It's more about gish galloping and shouting down the opposition with overwhelming numbers and having a "referee" who is on the side of the hoaxers.
but the point is, it's much easier to "win" a "debate" than to actually find the truth. or even bother looking for it.
 

Svartbjørn

Senior Member.
oh I have. It's more about gish galloping and shouting down the opposition with overwhelming numbers and having a "referee" who is on the side of the hoaxers.
but the point is, it's much easier to "win" a "debate" than to actually find the truth. or even bother looking for it.


Case in point.. The Bill Nye Debate at the creationist museum.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
oh, and I forgot about this. the woman Fetzer claims is Shannon Hicks in his photograph (and Shannon Hicks claims is a parent waiting for her kids) IS a parent waiting for her kids. She is seen here later at the firehouse after being reunited with her children.

grief.png
 

Lucy May

New Member
My first official contribution to the site, I hope this helps with this particular issue.

In regard to the claim that the "conga line" evacuation photos were staged, I decided to take a closer look at the photos and it took me a matter of seconds to see they were very wrong about their claims. Of course we already know they're wrong, but here's why.

They assert that the children were simply rearranged to make it look like a different set of children were being taken out of the school. To be exact, this is Fetzer's wording, and I quote, "We have published several studies of the celebrated Shannon Hicks’ “iconic photograph”, which seems to show children being evacuated from Sandy Hook. But now we have additional proof it was staged, where the children were rearranged into a different sequence to create the “best shot” to convey the false impression that a real emergency was taking place."

In Fetzer's side-by-side photo, with the red circles indicating that the one child in the dark shirt is the same child both photos, and that the boy in the gray shirt encircled in blue behind him is in one shot, but not in the other. The reason why the boy in the gray shirt is not behind him in the other shot is because the boy(s) in black are two different children.

I have made notations of the differences to show they are not the same boy and thus, they were not rearranged.

One more thing I would like to note is that there is only one student that they supposedly rearranged, which doesn't make sense. Why not rearrange them all instead of only one?


fetzersclaim.jpg




shannonhicksphoto1adialogue1.jpg





shannonhicksphoto1withdialogue1.jpg
 

MickeyS

Member
I don't know if this has been addressed or not regarding Shannon Hicks and her photographs, I believe I did a pretty good job explaining and pointing this debunked claim out to somebody (as well as referencing this thread), but someone else raised a question about press access to a "hot zone" so soon after the shooting. Where in relation to the shooting are these pictures taken and how was Shannon Hicks able to have been granted access so quickly to be able to walk around taking pictures? I hope this question makes sense, if somebody could point me to where this has maybe been discussed because I'm pretty clueless as to what were "hot zones" and what weren't lol. All those marked up diagrams on the aerial photos makes my poor ADD addled brain wobble Btw...I hope you guys recognize me as someone trying to answer somebody's claim and not actually on the Truther Train lol. I think I've been extremely clear as to where I stand with this.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
I don't know if this has been addressed or not regarding Shannon Hicks and her photographs, I believe I did a pretty good job explaining and pointing this debunked claim out to somebody (as well as referencing this thread), but someone else raised a question about press access to a "hot zone" so soon after the shooting. Where in relation to the shooting are these pictures taken and how was Shannon Hicks able to have been granted access so quickly to be able to walk around taking pictures? I hope this question makes sense, if somebody could point me to where this has maybe been discussed because I'm pretty clueless as to what were "hot zones" and what weren't lol. All those marked up diagrams on the aerial photos makes my poor ADD addled brain wobble Btw...I hope you guys recognize me as someone trying to answer somebody's claim and not actually on the Truther Train lol. I think I've been extremely clear as to where I stand with this.

Shannon Hicks works for the Newtown Bee so was in town -maybe 2 miles away?- when the first calls went out. As you can see there are also several parents in the parkinglot at that time as well. Basically the first responding police were busy searching for shooters and trying to protect the children... the public wasnt removed from the parkinglot at that time. She didnt have "press access" she just showed up. Her car is actually the white jeep that the crime tape is attached to in the parkinglot.

Does this help?

jeepin lot.JPG

add: article on her story http://time.com/3449676/the-story-behind-the-iconic-photograph-from-sandy-hook/
 
Last edited:

MickeyS

Member
Shannon Hicks works for the Newtown Bee so was in town -maybe 2 miles away?- when the first calls went out. As you can see there are also several parents in the parkinglot at that time as well. Basically the first responding police were busy searching for shooters and trying to protect the children... the public wasnt removed from the parkinglot at that time. She didnt have "press access" she just showed up. Her car is actually the white jeep that the crime tape is attached to in the parkinglot.

Does this help?

View attachment 16976
Yes!! Thanks girl! And I especially appreciate the one simple aerial so as not to confuse me too much :D
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
UNdebunkable Debunked: Boston Marathon Bombing: James Costello Ripped Clothes Boston Marathon Bombings 10
PCWilliams Debunked: James Holmes Comparison Photos - Imposter Conspiracy Theories 33
Mick West Debunked: Photo of James E Holmes at Occupy San Diego Conspiracy Theories 0
Mick West Debunked: Pentagon has Evidence of "Off-World Vehicles Not Made on this Earth" UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 14
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 4
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 16
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Obama called Michelle "Michael" in a speech. (Referring to Michael Mullen Jr) Quotes Debunked 0
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
novatron Debunked: California Wildfires Match the Exactly Path of the Proposed Rail System Wildfires 3
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
W Debunked: Qanon claims there have been 51k sealed indictments filed this year. Current Events 11
K Debunked: Audio of David Rockefeller "leaked" speech in 1991 [Audio Simulation] General Discussion 2
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Mick West Debunked: XYO Device Replacing GPS, Saving $2 Million a Day General Discussion 23
Mick West Debunked: "Tip Top" as a QAnon Clue from Trump [He's said it before] Conspiracy Theories 3
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Delta Lambda Compression General Discussion 16
MisterB Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
JFDee Debunked: Wernher von Braun confirmed that rockets can't leave earth Conspiracy Theories 23
Mick West Debunked: Missing $21 Trillion / $6.5 Trillion / $2.3 Trillion - Journal Vouchers Conspiracy Theories 33
MikeG Debunked: Obamacare Article 54 (Satire FB Page) General Discussion 2
Mick West Debunked: "Deadly Ultraviolet UV-C and UV-B Penetration to Earth’s Surface:" [Stray Light] Contrails and Chemtrails 32
Astro Debunked: Apollo Lunar Module Hatch Too Small for Spacesuit Science and Pseudoscience 0
Mick West Debunked: NIST's Lack of Explanation for WTC7 Freefall [They Have One - Column Buckling] 9/11 38
Jedo Debunked: WTC7 was the only building not on the WTC block that had a fire on 9/11 9/11 0
Mick West Debunked: Thermite Slag on WTC beams [Oxy Cutting Slag] 9/11 2
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top