Debunked: Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison [Lead in Avgas]

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
An article by Mike Adams conflates a real issue (lead in AV Gas) with a fake issue (Chemtrails). The title of the article is: "Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison: 571 tons of toxic lead 'chemtrailed' into America's skies every year", and is illustrate with this image of some persistent contrails:


The chemtrail theory is that the long white lines that form behind planes are some kind of toxic spraying. Hence the word "chemtrails" in the title, and the image of trails (normal persistent contrails).

The real issue here is the lead in Avgas (Aviation Gasoline), the fuel used by small prop planes in general aviation, this type of thing:


Avgas is NOT the same as jet fuel (kerosene) which is used by passenger jets, and is responsible for the contrails in the photo above. Contrails are clouds triggered by the extra water in jet exhaust. There is no connection between contrails and the lead in avgas - most simply because most planes that use avgas do not fly high enough to create contrails (except in unusual weather conditions), but also because the tiny amount of lead would not contribute to contrail formation.

Lead pollution is a genuine issue, and one that is being looked into very seriously by the EPA. However the hysterical language of Adam's article is seriously lacking in perspective. He notes a figure of 571 tons of lead emissions in 2008. This sounds like a lot, until you look at a historical perspective:

https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/lead-emissions-pdf.7605/


Look at the total levels in 1970, that's 220,000 tons per year. Now look at the levels for 1990 to 2005 - so small they had to make another graph. The level of lead emitted every year has decreased over 99%. Avgas was never a big part of this, and the reason lead was not phased out of avgas was simply cost/benefit. Avgas made up a tiny insignificant fraction of the total lead emissions back in 1970. It's only now that emissions are about 1/100th of what they were, that avgas has become a significant fraction. But it's a significant fraction of a very small number - in fact it you take it as a fraction of the 1970 total, it's just 0.25% (1/400th).

So while the lead emissions are vastly smaller than they were in the 1970s, that does no mean there is no cause for concern. However the focus is on localized effects - particularly around general aviation airports, such as Santa Monica airport. SMO is just a mile from my house, and the planes practicing their takeoff and landings fly just 1,000 feet above my house every day. There is certainly some local concern about the levels of lead in the air and soil right next to the airport, and this has been studied quite extensively by the EPA.
https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/epa-lead-modeling-study-presentation-pdf.7607/
http://www.healthycal.org/archives/7717

Testing on how that effects surrounding neighborhoods is relatively new. Two of the first investigations — conducted by the Southern California Air Quality Management District at the Santa Monica and Van Nuys airports in the spring of 2006 and winter of 2007 – found lead concentrations near the runways that were five to 10 times higher than the Los Angeles Basin average. In the neighborhood just east of Santa Monica Airport, concentrations continued to exceed background levels for more than half a mile downwind of the runway.

AQMD spokesman Sam Atwood noted that the pollution never rose above the national safety cutoff, 0.15 micrograms of lead per cubic meter of air. The Los Angeles basin average during the test period was 0.0086 microgram, In Van Nuys, the highest level recorded was 0.0261 and in Santa Monica, 0.096.

Testifying in November at a hearing of the state Senate Select Committee on Air Quality, Hoang said a 2010 study by the EPA found similar results. Soil and dust samples taken on Santa Monica Airport property and at local parks did not show lead levels above the local norm, she said.
Content from External Source


So small increases were found, within safe levels (the cut-off is 150 nanograms/m3, purple on the scale above), and only very close to the airport.

In summary, lead pollution is a real issue, but it's one that has mostly been dealt with. 99% of the emission sources are gone. Lead from avgas is a significant part of the the remaining emissions, but it's still very small compared to historical levels. High lead levels from avgas have only been detected directly adjacent to very busy small airport. The hysterical language of Adam's headline does not match the real nature of the problem.

And it's nothing to do with contrails, or the "chemtrail" theory. These planes generally don't leave visible trails.
 

Attachments

  • Lead Emissions.pdf
    180.3 KB · Views: 1,987
  • 420f10013.pdf
    560.5 KB · Views: 663
  • EPA Lead Modeling Study Presentation.pdf
    1.3 MB · Views: 1,029
Last edited:

WeedWhacker

Senior Member
THIS story is about AvGas. ("AvGas" = an abbreviated way to say "Aviation Gas", or more simply, Aviation fuel. Because, airplanes that use reciprocating engines, AKA your CAR that you usually drive. Airplane engines are (generally) air-cooled, and the FUEL that is specified for any type of reciprocating piston-powered airplane IS highly regulated, for this and many other reasons.

Let's not forget that OTHER types of airplanes utilize different fuels. Turbine Fuel (aka "Jet-A1") is basically a form of kerosene. Yeah, JET engines LOVE it....but piston 4-cycle engines?? Not so much...THEY want something (like "gasoline") that atomitizes easily.

SORRY if this post is too basic to some people....it just sometimes needs to be explained, for the benefit of those who have never dealt with engines (either 2-cycle or 4-cycle) beyond the "Start" switch (or keyed ignition switch) in their automobile.....
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
What prompted Mike Adams to write the piece - did he just find some old research on it and sensationalise or has the issue had exposure recently?
Some comments under his scare-piece add some perspective.

  • Corie Amundson29 minutes ago
    Gee, my calculations based on the above (31,536 dumped over 9.83 million km's square), like the one below, show 3mg per square kilometer per year in the USA.. The space you're standing in, 1 square meter, gets "showered" with .003 mg of led per year. To put that in perspective one 4.5 inch hair on your head weighs about .7mg. So in 233 years the square meter you occupy is being "pelted" with 1 hair's worth of lead IN TOTAL. So ya I smoke as much pot as the next guy - if we want to be paranoid about being poisoned there are plenty of other red flags much, much huger than aircraft fuel.

    contrails in the photo are not likely to be from from piston engine aircraft.

    The further math results in the amount of lead applied per acre being .00753 ounces per acre per year. That's 1/133 of an ounce, or about the weight of two toothpicks in lead/ per acre, per year. That's .0000015 ounces per square yard, or 1/666666 of an ounce per square yard per year in the USA. That's .000075 ounces or 1/13333 of an ounce per square yard of the USA over 50 years. That's about 2 milligrams, or 1/50th of a toothpick in lead weight per square yard every 50 years.

    Now, I am not an advocate for pollution, or an apologist for any industry. But throwing numbers out and not bringing them down to the ground where it matters does not help.

    While it would be a helpful thing if technology would find a replacement for lead in all fuels, there are more pressing environmental issues where pollutant emissions are a greater threat to human health than piston aircraft fuel emissions. There are also more pressing lead exposure issues. Even organic produce can have high levels of lead if they are grown on soil that was previously used with lead-based pesticides in the "old-days", or simply soil that has a high natural lead content level.
Content from External Source
 

Hevach

Senior Member.
3mg per square km is even less than .003 per square meter. 1 square km is 1000x1000 meters. So it's 0.00003mg per square meter. You probably get more lead than that in ordinary water or food contamination.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
A mile away from the runway, and it's not detectable above background levels.


Another issue with leaded avgas is that when you preflight check the plane you drain a bit of fuel to check for water. This is commonly just discarded onto the ground. But even after decades of this, there was still no significantly raised level of lead detected in the ground at Santa Monica
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Dane Wigington also takes issue with the Natural News Article, but for different reasons
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/is-natural-news-trying-to-hide-global-climate-engineering/
This is the headline from a just posted article By Mike Adams. Does it seem odd to anyone that nowhere in the Adams article is the intentional spraying of the skies even mentioned? Does it seem odd that the terms “geoengineering” and “climate engineering” are never brought up? And why wouldn’t you mention all the aluminum and barium showing up in lab tests around the globe, Mike? Doesn’t that matter any more? The article in question mentions “571 tons of lead” put into the atmosphere annually, but what about the 20,000,000 tons of aluminum nano particulates stated as an annual atmospheric spraying goal by the geoengineers? The article above by Mike Adams implies that the trails we see in our skies are simply a matter of very dirty fuel, thats it. This implication is patently false and there is no excuse for this disinformation from one that claims to be an independent researcher and journalist.
Content from External Source
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
Dane Wigington also takes issue:
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/is-natural-news-trying-to-hide-global-climate-engineering/
The article above by Mike Adams implies that the trails we see in our skies are simply a matter of very dirty fuel, thats it. This implication is patently false and there is no excuse for this disinformation from one that claims to be an independent researcher and journalist.
Content from External Source
Dane, the lead isn't there because the fuel is "dirty".

Tetraethyl lead (TEL) is added to avgas to increase octane and thereby prevent “knock,” or uncontrolled fuel detonation, which can damage aircraft engines during flight, compromising safety.
EHP – Sunset for Leaded Aviation Gasoline?
ehp.niehs.nih.gov/121-a54/
Content from External Source
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Dane, the lead isn't there because the fuel is "dirty".

And leaded fuel is probably responsible of <1% of all contrails, which, as mentioned above, come largely from jet engine planes (including turboprops), not piston engined prop planes. That's due to the altitude they fly, nothing to do with fuel.
 
Last edited:

Raccoon

Member
And leaded fuel is probably responsible of <1% of all contrails, which, as mentioned above, come largely from jet engine planes (including turboprops), not piston engined prop planes. That's due to the altitude they fly, nothing to do with fuel.
Well actually, Airport Teuge (where I come very often) are planning to replace Leaded fuel with bio fuel (MOGAS) to make it better for the environment.

See more, see the link! > http://www.vliegclubteuge.nl/mva/in...58:mogas-in-de-cvt&catid=4:algemeen&Itemid=21 (mainly in dutch)
 

MikeC

Closed Account
Yep - typically aero engines are not designed to run on the particular mix of hydrocarbons in MOtor GASoline, so require approval to do so. IIRC 20 years ago here in NZ if you ran an engine on MoGas you then couldn't then run it on AvGas without a strip/rebuild.

however in recent times the supply of highly leaded AvGas has become undesirable from an environmental point of view, and a new generation of engines does not require AvGas and so MoGas is becoming more popular

This article notes the main differences - http://generalaviationnews.com/2011/03/16/10-mogas-myths/
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Debunked: Irrefutable Film Footage Of Climate Engineering Aerosol Spraying [Aerodynamic Contrails] Contrails and Chemtrails 4
T Explained/Debunked: "Irrefutable Footage of Climate Engineering Aerosol Spraying" - Explanations? Contrails and Chemtrails 20
Oystein Debunked: Gibraltar cancels Christmas Coronavirus COVID-19 5
Mythic Suns [Debunked] Viral internet meme indirectly claiming that Greenland has already fully melted. Science and Pseudoscience 6
T AiG Debunked: Fossils Fail to Find Major Transition From Dinosaurs to Birds Science and Pseudoscience 10
Rory Debunked: UK undertaker's claim that Covid vaccine is responsible for spike in deaths Coronavirus COVID-19 7
Marc Powell Debunked: 9/11 truth experts are knowledgeable professionals and their judgments are to be trusted 9/11 195
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosions preparatory to demolition of the WTC North Tower are visible as Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower 9/11 7
Mick West Debunked: Pfizer Developing a Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill, Taken Alongside Vaccines Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition “squib” is visible at top of WTC North Tower before Flight 11 crash 9/11 67
Marc Powell Debunked: Construction worker Philip Morelli experienced an explosion in the sub-basement of the North Tower 9/11 0
Marc Powell Debunked: ABC News correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported an explosion in the subway 9/11 1
Marc Powell Debunked: Debris from twin towers was projected upward by explosives 9/11 13
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Marc Powell Debunked: NIST computer simulation of Building 7 collapse is inaccurate 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: FEMA reported finding evidence that steel had melted. 9/11 47
Marc Powell Debunked: VP Dick Cheney ordered a standdown of jet fighters on 9/11 9/11 16
Oystein Debunked: Claim that Bobby McIlvaine's injuries ("lacerations") are best explained as result of glass shards and debris from bombs 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: World Trade Center should not have collapsed due to 9/11 fires 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Firefighter reports of secondary explosions 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Steel was hurled hundreds of feet by explosives 9/11 4
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition Explosion Before Collapse of South Tower 9/11 8
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosion in South Tower Lobby 9/11 7
Marc Powell Debunked: Mysterious Explosion Before the Flight 11 Crash 9/11 48
J.d.K Debunked: Marx: "The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions must give way... They must perish in the revolutionary Holocaust" Quotes Debunked 0
dimebag2 Poll : Which DOD Navy video do you consider debunked ? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 74
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 9
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 76
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs and Aliens 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs and Aliens 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 9
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top