Debunked: Explosion in South Tower Lobby

Marc Powell

Active Member
9/11 conspiracy theorists cite a mysterious explosion in the lobby of the South Tower shortly before it collapsed as evidence of controlled demolition. The explosion is mentioned at about the 48:40 mark In the 2014 David Hooper film, The Anatomy of a Great Deception (viewable in its entirety on YouTube at youtube.com/watch?v=l0Q5eZhCPuc ), where a still picture is presented that appears to show a column of dark smoke emanating from the lobby windows on the south side of the building. Here is a frame from Hooper’s film showing the still picture:


1 - AOAGD Smoke Picture.jpg


The narrator (Hooper himself) tells the audience that the picture was recently released under a Freedom of Information Act request and that it "captured an explosion originating at the base of the South Tower just before the first tower collapsed." However, that is simply not true. There is no evidence of an explosion, there is nothing suspicious about the photo and the US Government was not reluctant to release it. The source of the smoke was actually a burning utility van hundreds of feet away from the South Tower that had been ignited by falling debris. The van was not visible in the picture due to the low-resolution of the image which, contrary to David Hooper’s claims, was not from the 2011 FOIA release but was scanned from a 2005 NIST report on emergency operations (NCSTAR 1-8, Page 102). It was included there merely to show where emergency vehicles had parked. Here is the picture as it appears in the NIST report:

2 - NCSTAR 1-8 Page 102.jpg

The actual FOIA photo is much higher in resolution and shows a lot more detail. It is shown below.


3 - Roll_5_25.jpg


If you zoom in on the original photo at the point where the smoke seems to be originating, you will see the top of the burning van and orange flame visible through a rear window. If you cannot make it out, the orange flame is directly below the traffic sign that says "RIGHT TURN YIELD TO PEDESTRIANS." Here is a blowup of that area of the picture:


4 - Roll_5_25 Blowup.jpg


The burning van was parked next to the escalator section of the Liberty Street Pedestrian Bridge, more than 200 feet from the WTC South Tower. When the picture was taken, the wind had shifted and the angle of the shot happened to be lined up just right so that it looks as if the smoke from the van in the foreground was coming from the World Trade Center building in the distance. The picture below, taken a few moments before on the same roll of film, clearly shows the actual source of the smoke:


5 - Roll_5_24.jpg


Here is a blowup of the area of the picture showing the top of the burning van:


6 - Roll_5_24 Blowup.jpg


At least a dozen other pictures taken by NYPD photographers around the base of the South Tower clearly show the burning van and the undamaged South Tower lobby. One has to wonder why David Hooper and his Technical Director, Richard Gage, chose to present the one picture where the van is not visible and the source of the smoke is ambiguous.

Incidentally, the two pictures referenced above are available on the website of the International Center for 9/11 Studies. Here are their URLs:


https://ia601306.us.archive.org/27/...ase_04/Release 4/42A0003 - 3of3/Roll_5_25.jpg

https://ia601306.us.archive.org/27/...ase_04/Release 4/42A0003 - 3of3/Roll_5_24.jpg
 
Last edited:

Amber Robot

Active Member
Why would an explosion at the ground floor be related to a top-down destruction of the building?

I can’t even follow the logic of most of the controlled demolition conspiracies.
 

Marc Powell

Active Member
Why would an explosion at the ground floor be related to a top-down destruction of the building?

I can’t even follow the logic of most of the controlled demolition conspiracies.
There is no logic, just as there is no evidence. However, that doesn't stop filmmakers and charlatans from making up stuff for the consumption of naïve paranoiacs. The David Hooper film from which I drew the two misrepresentations discussed in this thread and my previous thread contains dozens of similar instances where evidence was altered, misrepresented or concealed for the purpose of tricking the audience into believing things happened that really didn’t. That film was heavily promoted on the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth website and features its CEO, Richard Gage, as its “Technical Director.” As my time permits, I will create new threads debunking additional misrepresentations in Hooper’s ironically-titled film.
 

Marc Powell

Active Member
"See how the government is lying to us, but we know the real truth" is the ironic narrative here.
The "ironic narrative" is that a movie, that is itself filled with deceptions, could have been given the title The Anatomy of a Great Deception. If the claims made by the filmmakers were true, they would stand tall on their own merits and not need to be propped up with the kinds of fraudulent manipulation of evidence and hiding of explanatory information I have been documenting.
 
Why would an explosion at the ground floor be related to a top-down destruction of the building?
The idea is that the internal columns would have needed to be weakened before the top-down collapse would have been even possible. This "argument" is usually made by people that have no clue about the engineering of the towers.
 

Abdullah

New Member
The idea is that the internal columns would have needed to be weakened before the top-down collapse would have been even possible. This "argument" is usually made by people that have no clue about the engineering of the towers.
Or, even more importantly, about how Newton's third law actually works.
Seriously. The WTC towers are not in fact the only buildings to undergo a symmetrical top-down collapse through the path of greatest resistance without any demolition whatsoever. But when I point this out, the response has usually been "no well-designed building"(no true Scotsman) would fall like that/
 

Marc Powell

Active Member
Or, even more importantly, about how Newton's third law actually works.
Seriously. The WTC towers are not in fact the only buildings to undergo a symmetrical top-down collapse through the path of greatest resistance without any demolition whatsoever. But when I point this out, the response has usually been "no well-designed building"(no true Scotsman) would fall like that/
The path of least resistance for any tall steel frame building undergoing collapse is straight down in the direction of the gravity vector.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition Explosion Before Collapse of South Tower 9/11 8
Marc Powell Debunked: Construction worker Philip Morelli experienced an explosion in the sub-basement of the North Tower 9/11 0
Marc Powell Debunked: ABC News correspondent George Stephanopoulos reported an explosion in the subway 9/11 1
Marc Powell Debunked: Mysterious Explosion Before the Flight 11 Crash 9/11 48
Mick West Debunked: "Missile Strike" caused Nashville Explosion General Discussion 3
Mick West Debunked: Nashville Explosion was "Across the Street" from the RV General Discussion 0
Mick West Debunked: Carbon Monoxide "Explosion" on US West Coast Feb 26th? [Terra Satellite Glitch] General Discussion 13
Bruno D. Debunked: Tianjin explosion was caused by a nuke Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Natural News - Boston controlled explosion exercise Boston Marathon Bombings 99
Mick West Debunked: Man Captures Video Of Strange Explosion In The Sky (Weather Balloon) Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 3
Rory Debunked: UK undertaker's claim that Covid vaccine is responsible for spike in deaths Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: 9/11 truth experts are knowledgeable professionals and their judgments are to be trusted 9/11 195
Marc Powell Debunked: Explosions preparatory to demolition of the WTC North Tower are visible as Flight 175 crashes into the South Tower 9/11 7
Mick West Debunked: Pfizer Developing a Twice-Per-Day COVID Pill, Taken Alongside Vaccines Coronavirus COVID-19 0
Marc Powell Debunked: Demolition “squib” is visible at top of WTC North Tower before Flight 11 crash 9/11 67
Marc Powell Debunked: Debris from twin towers was projected upward by explosives 9/11 13
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Marc Powell Debunked: NIST computer simulation of Building 7 collapse is inaccurate 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: FEMA reported finding evidence that steel had melted. 9/11 47
Marc Powell Debunked: VP Dick Cheney ordered a standdown of jet fighters on 9/11 9/11 16
Oystein Debunked: Claim that Bobby McIlvaine's injuries ("lacerations") are best explained as result of glass shards and debris from bombs 9/11 22
Marc Powell Debunked: World Trade Center should not have collapsed due to 9/11 fires 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Firefighter reports of secondary explosions 9/11 3
Marc Powell Debunked: Steel was hurled hundreds of feet by explosives 9/11 4
J.d.K Debunked: Marx: "The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions must give way... They must perish in the revolutionary Holocaust" Quotes Debunked 0
dimebag2 Poll : Which DOD Navy video do you consider debunked ? UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 74
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Theferäl [Debunked] Object Seen From Airplane Above Canberra: 04 Apr 2012 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
TEEJ Debunked: Claim that Joe Biden's hand passes through microphone during White House press gaggle, 16th March 2021 Election 2020 8
bird_up Debunked: "Interdimensional being" caught on CCTV in Neza, Mexico Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 6
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 75
Patrick Gonzalez Debunked: missing cable on Perseverance landing footage proves it is fake. General Discussion 3
TEEJ Debunked: Biden's Oval Office "Coming Apart at the Seams" [It's a Door] Election 2020 19
derrick06 Debunked: UFO over California Highway (TMZ) UFOs and Aliens 1
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
Mick West Debunked: Biden signing "Blank" Executive Orders Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Biden in "Fake" Oval Office Election 2020 27
P Debunked: UN hidden camera: the first UFO contact happened [Deep Fake] UFOs and Aliens 3
Mick West Debunked: 94% of Fulton County Ballots Manually Adjudicated [It's a Process all Batches go Through] Election 2020 0
Mick West Debunked: "Error rate of 68.5% Allowable is .0008%" [Neither is True] Election 2020 4
Mick West Debunked: Claim that the Electoral College Count On Jan 6 will Change the Election Election 2020 136
Rory Debunked: Einstein wrote "blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth" Quotes Debunked 12
Mick West Debunked: Navid Keshavarz-Nia's Claims of "A Sudden Rise in Slope" as Election Fraud Evidence Election 2020 5
Mick West Debunked: Trump's Claim of "1,126,940 votes created out of thin air" in PA Election 2020 9
Mick West Debunked: Crowder's "Fraud Week" Title Graphic (and Why it Matters) Election 2020 1
JFDee Debunked: Democratic senators complained about 'vote switching' by Dominion voting machines in 2019 Election 2020 2
Mendel Debunked: The Democrats are trying to take away freedom of religion Election 2020 6
H Debunked: Dr. Shiva's Scatterplot Analysis of Michigan Precincts Election 2020 43
Mick West Debunked: Suspicious "Biden Only" Ballots in Georgia Election 2020 3
Mick West Debunked: "Nancy Pelosi's long time Chief of Staff is a key executive at Dominion Voting" Election 2020 0
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top