Good job, Mick.
Why not apply the EXACT same logic you used to successfully debunk these photos, to debunk the bullshit story of "planes" on 9/11? That is to say, you examined the pixels of these photos closely enough to see that unfortunate errors were made by the graphic artist. In this case, I think one of the big winning points here is the "red stripe" shown to be painted over the yellow strap, which physically holds the missile down. That is utterly impossible, so that along with the other mistakes should be enough to debunk these photos.
So why not apply your SAME attention to detail and logic shown here, to the famous "NOSED OUT" video that was seen on TV by billions of people. That famous video everyone saw on TV that day clearly shows a "plane" breaking through the front corner of WTC2 (south west corner to be exact) with its nose coming out the other side of the WTC2, in tact. Just much like the red paint on this missile cannot possibly be covering the yellow strap, since the yellow strap is exterior to (i.e. on top of) the missile. Only in the case of the video, its the opposite. The physical south west corner of WTC2, which is seen "in front" of the alleged crash point into WTC2, should not show it's angle breaking. Yet, sure as you proved that these photos cannot be real, your same logic proves that the WTC2 "plane crash" must also be fake, no matter that it was on "TV", and no matter how many people saw the video. Those two facts don't magically correct the glaring errors in the video, and physical impossibilities of that footage.
I suspect that you and your team already know all about the NOSED OUT video, but just in case, here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5-xcvv_fRQ
No reply is needed. I've retired from arguing with people about 9/11, i just wanted to commend you on doing a good job of debunking this photo and hope you or maybe others will use your same logic and same techniques to debunk to infamous WTC2 "plane" crash on 9/11.
Best of luck, Mick.