Debunked: Boston Marathon victims: "crisis actors"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Like with Sandy Hook, there are people coming out of the woodwork to suggest that the entire Boston Marathon Bombing was simply staged for TV, and that some or all of the victims were "crisis actors" - people trained to accurately portray victims of a disaster.

Crisis actors are real - they are used to train first responders how to deal with a disaster. But it should be very obvious to everyone that that is not what is going on here. The incredibly large amount of photos and videos make it horribly clear that these were real bombs, and these are real injuries.

Example from Facebook:



This follows a long tradition of conspiracy theorists finding people who look vaguely similar, and then claiming they are the same person. Often the people are so dissimilar that we can only conclude the poster has some kind of face blindness.

But anyway, the man in the top left is not Nick Vigt, he is Jeff Bauman Jr, and was identified by his father:
http://www.lowellsun.com/todaysheadlines/ci_23034567/pray-my-son-father-says-chelmsford-man
 
Last edited:

Agav8r

Member
I figured this was going to be one of the first conspiracies out of the 'chute. The thing with this vs Sandy Hook, as you pointed out Mick, is the overwhelming amount of video and still photo evidence. More coming in every day too. That famous cropped photo of Mr. Bauman being rushed to medical help in the wheelchair is very mild when compared to the photos with him and other victims on the sidewalk in the immediate moments after the explosion. Absolutely devastating. I doubt any of these people claiming that this a crisis actor event would have the courage to make these accusations to the victims or their families. Given the overwhelming evidence, I expect this one to be quashed quickly.
 

Joe

Senior Member
Heres the latest Video calling it a false flag . This is what happens when people collect unemployment benefits for too long
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
Really? You have to equate this with your anti-'any sort of government help' agenda? You're as bad as the politicians you're so quick to denounce as ideologically profiting from a disaster.


Edit... Ah never mind, not worth picking a fight over a throwaway comment. Pardon me.

IMO it's a result of listening to right wing propaganda. (just kidding. it's the result of an internet culture that rewards stupidity.)
 

Joe

Senior Member
Really? You have to equate this with your anti-'any sort of government help' agenda? You're as bad as the politicians you're so quick to denounce as ideologically profiting from a disaster.
no not me . read before you speak . Im saying they have nothing better to do then make shit up . Im not a truther . never have been . Actually find it quite disturbing . As much as a dislike my government I would never believe they stage a event like this . I was simply point out where this is headed . I suggest next time you read my post first . Or read my comment left on YT ?
 

Joe

Senior Member
Really? You have to equate this with your anti-'any sort of government help' agenda? You're as bad as the politicians you're so quick to denounce as ideologically profiting from a disaster.


Edit... Ah never mind, not worth picking a fight over a throwaway comment. Pardon me.

IMO it's a result of listening to right wing propaganda. (just kidding. it's the result of an internet culture that rewards stupidity.)
The right wing propaganda I listen to and read denounces all truthers FYI . I believe you owe me an apology ?
 

Cairenn

Senior Member.
A quick glance at the comments there and it seems That a sizable percentage of posters, prefer a conspiracy theory. That is disturbing, of course that just reflect the ones that post, not read it.
 

Joe

Senior Member
A quick glance at the comments there and it seems That a sizable percentage of posters, prefer a conspiracy theory. That is disturbing, of course that just reflect the ones that post, not read it.
Did you see my post spamming metabunk over there with a link ? That site has millions daily .
 

Joe

Senior Member
I did, and I hope it helps.

But here goes Beck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=joYnT_yiVKE
I understand what he is saying . I dont want to blame anyone or any group until more info is out . He being defensive of course . They only say Muslim because the bomb is similar to ones used in Afganistan .that doesnt mean its Radical Islam . clearly is terrorism . The targeting of innocent civilians also is a red flag . We will see and I will not speculate until more info is available . I want facts no bull . Beck sometimes jumps to conclusions but usually corrects himself after the fact . I dont always agree wih him either , Or as you can tell I hardly agree with anybody :)
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Does anybody have the patience to debunk the finer points of this article please? It is astonishing in its assumptions but some of the quasi-medical expertise seems to have people convinced:

[WARNING: GORE]
http://www.chrisspivey.co.uk/?p=11184
That already came up here:
https://www.metabunk.org/posts/38014

With the key being:
Its obvious nonsense, but from a purely factual basis:

[bunk]If you loose both your legs from explosive trauma half your blood is gone in one minute via the femoral arteries, youre dead after two. Bleeding out is worse with blunt force trauma (like shrapnel) because flesh is torn rather than cut, exposing more arterial and vascular tissue.[/bunk]

That's bunk, because people get both their legs blown off all the time, and survive. Even in places that don't have helpers and emergency services seconds away.
https://www.google.com/search?q=lost+both+legs+to+land+mine&tbm=isch

http://members.iinet.net.au/~pictim/mines/victims/victim.html
 
Last edited:

Ess T

New Member
Thank you! I've been trying to put out the flames of paranoid unreason where i find them but it's been tiresome to say the least. This site is a welcome safe haven from the battle! Thanks again.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
A valiant effort from a veteran who now is an emergency response worker is here...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread941791/pg1

Some interesting points - veins will retract into the body in response to severed body parts, also
Unfortunately reading some of the responses may induce homicidal despair.
 

Edgukator

Member
Sorry to be slightly off topic here, but the following video has been making the rounds. Because it is about the idea of "actors" and it isn't big enough to get it's own thread, I thought I would post it here:

[video=youtube_share;FYXmhBNz5D0]http://youtu.be/FYXmhBNz5D0[/video]

I know this should go without saying, but the debunk.

The word actor has more than one meaning. In fact the definition "a person that acts" - to act as in 'to do' - is the first definition in link I gave.

In fact, the idea of a terrorist actor (or at least Violent non-state actor) even has its own Wikipedia page.

So why did he correct himself? Probably because he knew how it would be misinterpreted.
 

JRBids

Senior Member.
It's so clear from the context. In other words, "these were the two people who committed this act". The actors.
 

TWCobra

Senior Member.
Kusznir got 200 times the hits on this subject compared to what his drivel normally gets. The guy is a part time actor so my guess is that any attention is good attention.
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
The guy is a part time actor so my guess is that any attention is good attention.
Bad enough that meme got started with Sandy Hook speakng about children who died, now they are accusing the living
of being fakes.

One day, the amputees or their families will address those who say they are actors. It won't be pretty.

I wonder how Kusznir would react if confronted by the stumps of a man or woman who is now forced to cope without a limb(s)?

Would he dare ask them how much they were paid to have their leg/arm cut off surgically to perpetuate a false flag?

Sometimes going too far might kill such a conspiracy theory. I can only hope.
 

Rilokilee

New Member
there is nothing wrong with questioning the facts outside of our own personal experience. After watching the vast amounts of footage there is a compelling argument that aspects of the event were staged. Appealing to morality or appropriateness to censor debate is unreasonable and assuming anything also unreasonable and futile to any meaningful conversation, We can merely speculate. Eye witness accounts don;t seem to fully corroborate the live footage...the "Boston Hero" as he was dubbed by the press stated the flags had been blown out by shrapnel, that he had carried Jeff by himself, that he had immediately gone to help him ect. Of course witness accounts can be wrong in the heat of the moment it is weird that no journalist picked up on this and that such simple observations could be so wrong. We have many reasons not to trust the media as they have made an industry and profit out of illusion and breaking from reality you shouldn't belittle people simply because they are contributing an alternative perspective to the mainstream homogeneity, the greater control over our perceptions the greater manipulation over our actions and motivations. The truth is subjective but by having variation in opinion a reflection of it may become clearer.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
After watching the vast amounts of footage there is a compelling argument that aspects of the event were staged.
What compelling argument? What aspects exactly?
All the 'issues' have been proven baseless. To continue to cling to them as evidence of staging is immoral and truly an awful kick in the face of the people affected by this.
 

ColtCabana

Senior Member
After watching the vast amounts of footage there is a compelling argument that aspects of the event were staged.
I'd be interested in which aspects you think were staged. Perhaps start a thread(s) for one or two of your biggest "smoking guns" and we can go from there. I'm willing to provide as much eyewitness account as you wish. I can promise you that the carnage I saw, as well as the fallout that my friend who works at an area hospital and dealt with multiple victims, was real. There's nothing wrong with questioning things, but when I see people disregard evidence and/or imply things that I know for a fact are not true, it's a little frustrating.
 
Last edited:

Rilokilee

New Member
What compelling argument? What aspects exactly?
All the 'issues' have been proven baseless. To continue to cling to them as evidence of staging is immoral and truly an awful kick in the face of the people affected by this.
What compelling argument? What aspects exactly?
All the 'issues' have been proven baseless. To continue to cling to them as evidence of staging is immoral and truly an awful kick in the face of the people affected by this.
Firstly no not all issues have been proven baseless because I wasn't there so to me the only things I know are what I see the facts are things that cannot be proven from my position experientially i mean. I'm making an epistemological argument not a factual one that assuming either way is pointless. When did I cling to any evidence at all?I said there is a compelling argument you should read critically rather than emotionally. I'm talking about the subjectivity of truth and how we come to understand it. There is evidence I have seen such as witness statements of Jeff and this Boston hero guy that do not align with the footage now that could mean shoddy journalism or crisis actors or whatever but it is not a kick in the face to anyone because if I had my limbs blown off I wouldn't be worrying about a small minority of people who didn't believe me or questioned aspects of the event. Evidence is also subjective and to me a guy standing up and adjusting his trousers and putting on glasses during a bombing is strange as well as a lot of things that i really don't have the time to go through ...I'm not saying it didn't happen just saying that we should all be critical of the news because it can be so easily manipulated. The discussion is more important than the conclusion. Blind acceptance of anything is irrational.
 

Rilokilee

New Member
I'd be interested in which aspects you think were staged. Perhaps start a thread(s) for one or two of your biggest "smoking guns" and we can go from there. I'm willing to provide as much eyewitness account as you wish. I can promise you that the carnage I saw, as well as the fallout that my friend who works at an area hospital and dealt with multiple victims, was real. There's nothing wrong with questioning things, but when I see people disregard evidence and/or imply things that I know for a fact are not true, it's a little frustrating.
I'm not going to because many people out there have already shown inconsistencies that may be explained away but they are out there for anyone to check out. I understand that you may have been there and it may be frustrating but how am I supposed to fully believe a random and quite anonymous person on the internets experiences. I really wonder why people are so against any discussion. It would be interesting to know where you where standing during the bombing and what you saw? but it seems that even those right in the action can't seem to get their stories straight so yes I am skeptical but not convinced either way.
 

Pete Tar

Senior Member.
You said there is a compelling argument that the bombing aftermath was 'staged' , but you didn't say what it actually was.
What's the 'subjective truth' about injuries from a bomb blast?
What exactly do you want to criticise about the news in this case?
This isn't a a philosophical matter, the truth is verifiable.
You seem to be proclaiming all truth is subjective so nothing can be proven ever, therefore all questions are valid and all answers are invalid.
This thread is about crisis actors. What is your position on it and how did you arrive at it?
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
What's the 'subjective truth' about injuries from a bomb blast?
What exactly do you want to criticise about the news in this case?
This isn't a a philosophical matter, the truth is verifiable.
You seem to be proclaiming all truth is subjective so nothing can be proven ever, therefore all questions are valid and all answers are invalid.
This seems to be an increasingly common view in today's world. It's as if moral relativism has transferred itself to the area of fact. The media's obsession with "balance" is part of the problem: as if every correct viewpoint needs to be balanced by a counterpoint, however wrong.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, yes. But if two people have opposing opinions of a fact, then one of them is quite simply wrong.
 

Rilokilee

New Member
You said there is a compelling argument that the bombing aftermath was 'staged' , but you didn't say what it actually was.
What's the 'subjective truth' about injuries from a bomb blast?
What exactly do you want to criticise about the news in this case?
This isn't a a philosophical matter, the truth is verifiable.
You seem to be proclaiming all truth is subjective so nothing can be proven ever, therefore all questions are valid and all answers are invalid.
This thread is about crisis actors. What is your position on it and how did you arrive at it?
There are many compelling arguments that have been made by others analyzing footage there are also compelling arguments against these too. I am not going to go over them BUT in holistic fashion it is a likely occurence and has been proven over and over again that aspects of news coverage are staged or manipulated take for example the pulling down of the Saddam statue or the story of Jessica Lynch (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/may/15/iraq.usa2) I am simply arguing of the potential for an event to be staged and so I would rather take a skeptical position if I wasn't a witness of the event. There is no subjectivity in injuries of a bomb blast there is subjectivity in how we perceive footage /evidence of these injuries. One person who has expertise in medicine might have one opinion another with expertise in prosthetics another Unless you were the doctor or paramedic of the victims that there is no way to verify or falsify the claims we are all basing our judgements on secondary data and so there is a level of subjectivity. My personal criticism of the news is that with all these events they have focused on the emotional at the expense of more critical analysis, how victimhood has become about celebrity, how people take it as a form of information when it is produced as entertainment and how alternative views are ridiculed and all lumped together under the contested and umbrella term "conspiracy theories". All truth is subjective because we use language to convey it and language is essentially metaphor (look into cognitive linguistics). The event happened but our perceptions are what is subjective so yes all questions of our perceptions are valid and all our conclusions can only be theoretical because we weren't there. The event could have been staged, it could have really happened or the reality might lie somewhere in the middle i don't know and neither do you. Also the epistemological argument is so important to the veracity of truth because it concerns knowledge and how we arrive at it.
I believe crisis actors are used to stage events because they have been used in the past (eg. Nariyah Testimony- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_(testimony)) I know that for some time there has been a marriage between hollywood and the military and historically it is quite clear that those in power use whatever resources are available to them to control the masses before it was more physical force now a much subtler psychological brainwashing.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Rilokilee, the examples you give (eg Nayirah) were not events that were witnessed in person by hundreds of people in the very country in which they were later reported. The analogy doesn't stand up.
 

Rilokilee

New Member
You
This seems to be an increasingly common view in today's world. It's as if moral relativism has transferred itself to the area of fact. The media's obsession with "balance" is part of the problem: as if every correct viewpoint needs to be balanced by a counterpoint, however wrong.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, yes. But if two people have opposing opinions of a fact, then one of them is quite simply wrong.
You think the news is balanced? Every viewpoint should be countered that is hegelian dialect thesis antithesis synthesis , what is wrong with the news is that they focus on polemics it is not moral relativism to accept that there might be more than one answer you can believe in subjectivity of thought and concepts without adhering to the notion that all thoughts and concepts are equal in how they convey reality or represent it.
 

Rilokilee

New Member
Rilokilee, the examples you give (eg Nayirah) were not events that were witnessed in person by hundreds of people in the very country in which they were later reported. The analogy doesn't stand up.
Its not intended as an analogy its an example of a crisis actor being used to fool the public and governing bodies.
 

Rilokilee

New Member
Rilokilee, the examples you give (eg Nayirah) were not events that were witnessed in person by hundreds of people in the very country in which they were later reported. The analogy doesn't stand up.
Also how many people actually witnessed the event or just witnessed the blast (which can be easily faked) ? From the pictures it doesn't look like that many people could have been close enough to see whether it was theatrics or real carnage especially with the fence covering most of the scene and most people instinctually running away from it
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
Also how many people actually witnessed the event or just witnessed the blast (which can be easily faked) ? From the pictures it doesn't look like that many people could have been close enough to see whether it was theatrics or real carnage especially with the fence covering most of the scene
There were plenty of people standing in the direct area of the blast.

 

ColtCabana

Senior Member
I'm not going to because many people out there have already shown inconsistencies that may be explained away but they are out there for anyone to check out. I understand that you may have been there and it may be frustrating but how am I supposed to fully believe a random and quite anonymous person on the internets experiences. I really wonder why people are so against any discussion. It would be interesting to know where you where standing during the bombing and what you saw? but it seems that even those right in the action can't seem to get their stories straight so yes I am skeptical but not convinced either way.
Rilokilee, the burden of proof isn't on me in regards to this. If you make a claim, you must provide evidence and not expect other people to go out, find said evidence, and then counter it blindly. That's unfair. You also don't have to believe me. I know what I saw and one of the main reasons I joined this forum was to provide eyewitness accounts and try to debunk a good amount of garbage information regarding the Boston Marathon bombing that was circulating. As stated, I saw injuries that were real. My friend also works at one of the Boston-area hospitals and helped treat many of those affected by the blast. Heck, he didn't even get home until Tuesday morning because of the severity of some of the injuries. If you have a question for me, please feel free to start a thread in this subforum about a particular point and I will do my absolute best to answer them as candidly as possible.

I encourage asking questions regarding the matter, but I encourage more the accepting of fact as truth.

Also how many people actually witnessed the event or just witnessed the blast (which can be easily faked) ? From the pictures it doesn't look like that many people could have been close enough to see whether it was theatrics or real carnage especially with the fence covering most of the scene and most people instinctually running away from it
For starters, I will answer this. I witnessed the carnage after the blast. I was standing on the corner of Exeter and Boylston when the first bomb went off. After that, we ran west on Boylston and witnessed the second blast from afar. After that, we ran east, not knowing what the heck to do, and saw the end result of the bombing. Real blood. Real injuries. That I can promise you.
 

Rilokilee

New Member
Rilokilee, the burden of proof isn't on me in regards to this. If you make a claim, you must provide evidence and not expect other people to go out, find said evidence, and then counter it blindly. That's unfair. You also don't have to believe me. I know what I saw and one of the main reasons I joined this forum was to provide eyewitness accounts and try to debunk a good amount of garbage information regarding the Boston Marathon bombing that was circulating. As stated, I saw injuries that were real. My friend also works at one of the Boston-area hospitals and helped treat many of those affected by the blast. Heck, he didn't even get home until Tuesday morning because of the severity of some of the injuries. If you have a question for me, please feel free to start a thread in this subforum about a particular point and I will do my absolute best to answer them as candidly as possible.

I encourage asking questions regarding the matter, but I encourage more the accepting of fact as truth.



For starters, I will answer this. I witnessed the carnage after the blast. I was standing on the corner of Exeter and Boylston when the first bomb went off. After that, we ran west on Boylston and witnessed the second blast from afar. After that, we ran east, not knowing what the heck to do, and saw the end result of the bombing. Real blood. Real injuries. That I can promise you.
Yes I am interested in finding out for sure what happened I am just taking a skeptical position I'm not gonna just change my opinion because someone on the internet told me they were there but Can you tell me exactly what you saw description of the victims and what injuries they had, how far away you were, what side of the street, if police were stopping people from getting any closer if you want to convince people of your story you need to be detailed where you near ring road at any point? Thanks for the information though
 

Rilokilee

New Member
Yes I am interested in finding out for sure what happened I am just taking a skeptical position I'm not gonna just change my opinion because someone on the internet told me they were there but Can you tell me exactly what you saw description of the victims and what injuries they had, how far away you were, what side of the street, if police were stopping people from getting any closer if you want to convince people of your story you need to be detailed where you near ring road at any point? Thanks for the information though
also the burden of proof is on you I have made no claims to anything simply speculation of the official story you have made a claim that you were there and that should be backed up thanks for your responses though
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
UNdebunkable Debunked: Boston Marathon Bombing: James Costello Ripped Clothes Boston Marathon Bombings 10
UNdebunkable Debunked: Boston Marathon Bombing: Karen Brassards "Lack of injuries" Boston Marathon Bombings 72
Mick West Debunked: Boston Marathon Family Guy Prediction Boston Marathon Bombings 29
C Debunked: Boston bombing recovery photo makes no sense from medical point of view Conspiracy Theories 47
Tobes Debunked: Movie producer Nathan Folks claims bombing false flag, Voice of Russia says blood too red Boston Marathon Bombings 134
Tobes Debunked: Anatomical impossibility of Jeff Bauman photos Boston Marathon Bombings 94
Oxymoron Debunked: Dawn Hochsprung's photo used for witness of Boston Bombing [Hoax] Boston Marathon Bombings 2
Mick West Debunked: Boston Bombing - "just a drill" (Ali Stevenson) Boston Marathon Bombings 33
Mick West Debunked: Boston Bombing: Man on the Roof Boston Marathon Bombings 7
Mick West Debunked: Natural News - Boston controlled explosion exercise Boston Marathon Bombings 99
N Debunked: Google Mail icon shows linkage to Freemasons Conspiracy Theories 0
Mendel Debunked: The WHO did not take the Taiwan CDC seriously Coronavirus COVID-19 0
A Why 9/11 Truthers Are Wrong About The Facts | (Part 1 w/ Mick West) 9/11 1
Mendel Debunked: Radar Waves Affect Clouds General Discussion 0
Pumpernickel Need Debunking: Foucault's Pendulum debunked through Mach's principle (the Earth is a static object in the center of the Universe) Science and Pseudoscience 13
M Ufos arrive to the central zone of Chile. (Debunked). Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Jesse3959 FE Debunked with water tube level - 187 foot building 21.2 miles away below eye level Flat Earth 0
H Debunked: Cadillac Mountain from 220 miles Flat Earth 7
Jesse3959 FE Claim Debunked: JTolan Epic Gravity Experiment - Flat earther disproves Perspective! (or his instruments.) Flat Earth 0
Mick West Debunked: DoD prepares for martial law in CONUS: Conspiracy Theories 0
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Greylandra Debunked: media headline "Judea declares war on Germany" [boycott] Conspiracy Theories 20
Mick West Discovery Channel's "Contact: Declassified Breakthrough" was debunked 2.5 years ago UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Joe Hill Debunked: "The North Face of Building 7 Was Pulled Inward" 9/11 66
A Debunked : Fake Set Moon Landing with TV Camera and Stairs Conspiracy Theories 3
Mick West Debunked: Photo with Sun Rays at Odd Angles Flat Earth 0
Staffan Debunked: Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing (Capricorn One movie scenes) Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Neil deGrasse Tyson : "That Stuff is Flat" Flat Earth 10
Mendel Debunked: Air Map of the World 1945 is a flat Earth map Flat Earth 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Trees being cut down "because they block 5G" (tree replacement in Belgium) 5G and Other EMF Health Concerns 44
deirdre Debunked: Exemption from military service doc proves Jews had foreknowledge of WW2 (fake leaflet) General Discussion 0
Trailblazer Debunked: Obama called Michelle "Michael" in a speech. (Referring to Michael Mullen Jr) Quotes Debunked 0
Rory Debunked: 120-mile shot of San Jacinto proves flat earth Flat Earth 39
Rory Debunked: The Lunar Cycle affects birth rates Health and Quackery 26
Rory Debunked: Study shows link between menstrual cycle and the moon Health and Quackery 30
novatron Debunked: California Wildfires Match the Exactly Path of the Proposed Rail System Wildfires 3
Rory Debunked: "You must love yourself before you love another" - fake Buddha quote Quotes Debunked 7
W Debunked: Qanon claims there have been 51k sealed indictments filed this year. Current Events 11
K Debunked: Audio of David Rockefeller "leaked" speech in 1991 [Audio Simulation] General Discussion 2
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Mick West Debunked: XYO Device Replacing GPS, Saving $2 Million a Day General Discussion 23
Mick West Debunked: "Tip Top" as a QAnon Clue from Trump [He's said it before] Conspiracy Theories 3
Whitebeard Debunked: Nibiru FOUND? Mysterious gigantic rogue planet spotted lurking outside our solar system Science and Pseudoscience 1
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
Mick West Debunked: Delta Lambda Compression General Discussion 16
MisterB Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
JFDee Debunked: Wernher von Braun confirmed that rockets can't leave earth Conspiracy Theories 23
Mick West Debunked: Missing $21 Trillion / $6.5 Trillion / $2.3 Trillion - Journal Vouchers Conspiracy Theories 33
MikeG Debunked: Obamacare Article 54 (Satire FB Page) General Discussion 2
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top