# Curvature and Refraction in Surveying and Leveling Through History. Old Books, etc.

#### Mick West

Staff member
Given that some people claim the curvature of the Earth is not accounted for in surveying, I thought it would be interesting to document various historical instances of this, and of accounting for refraction.

Curvature comes up in two ways. Firstly it arises when determining latitude and longitude by observation of sun and stars. The Earth here is assumed to be a sphere, and the stars essentially fixed in a "celestial sphere" infinitely far away.

Secondly it comes up in the practice of levelling which is the art of determining how high things are above a nominal level surface, such as the surface of the sea. Interestingly this use of the word "level" is often misinterpreted as meaning "flat", when the books on surveying make quite clear this is not the case.

Update: two additional ways in which curvature comes up in surveying, mentioned by @Jon Leighton

Spherical Excess In general, the internal angles of any large surveyed triangle will sum to more than 180 degrees.

Distance corrections including the chord to arc correction, and its inverse, the arc to chord correction.

A treatise on surveying, containing the theory and practice: , John Gummere, 1853, page 239
https://archive.org/stream/treatiseonsurve00gumm#page/238/mode/2up/

https://archive.org/stream/treatiseonsurve00gumm#page/242/mode/2up/

A definition of "levelling"

The Theory and Practice of Surveying, Robert Gibson, 1814
https://archive.org/stream/theoryandpracti00gibsgoog#page/n293/mode/2up

Actually from:
A Treatise of Practical Surveying, Robert Gibson, 1777
1808 version on archive.org:
https://archive.org/stream/atreatisepracti01gibsgoog#page/n283/mode/2up

Unfortunately the plates were improperly scanned. What is being referred to is on the left here:

1789 Version does not contain the section on levelling, but does mention the globe and celestial poles
https://archive.org/stream/treatiseofpracti00gibs#page/242/mode/2up/

A similar figure (likely derived from the Gibson work) is found in:
A treatise on surveying and navigation : uniting the theoretical, practical, and educational features of these subjects, by Robinson, Horatio N, 1858
https://archive.org/stream/treatiseonsurvey00robirich#page/n157/mode/2up

(again, note the definition of a level surface)

Slightly off topic, but in this older book, A treatise of practical geometry, published in 1745 (from a 1695 college book written in Latin), we have a discussion on the size of the earth:

https://archive.org/stream/atreatisepracti00greggoog#page/n51/mode/2up

Unfortunately again the figures were not well scanned, and this is all that remains of Fig 22.

Last edited:

#### Mick West

Staff member
Back to levelling, the correction that is generally being referred to is a correction the value of what we call "drop" - i.e. the amount the curve of the earth falls below a plane tangent to it at the view point. Often we use "8 inches per mile squared", as that's the expected value without refraction. Not very useful for surveyors though, as the atmopshere gets in the way. So they use a different value, for example a correction of 1/6 the drop seen above, or here:

The Principles and Practice of Surveying: Higher surveying, Charles Breed, 1908

0.57 feet per mile squared squared is 6.84" instead of 8".

#### Mick West

Staff member
Some interesting info on the history of geodetic refraction:

Picard seems to crop up more in discussion of astronomy, but he was also a geodetic surveyor.

And very interested in the daily variations of refraction

The "Gaussian Refraction Coefficient" of 0.13 +/- 25% is about 1/7. So it seem like the 1/7 correction dates back to 1826.

#### Mick West

Staff member
A treatise on surveying, containing the theory and practice: , John Gummere, 1853, page 239
https://archive.org/stream/treatiseonsurve00gumm#page/238/mode/2up/

I tried to buy a copy of this and serendipitous bought a different book: A Treatise on Surveying - Part I, by Middleton and Chadwick, 1899. It's an excellent book for describing how surveyors account for both curvature and refraction with all kinds of examples and discussions

A slightly later (1904) version can be found here:
https://archive.org/stream/atreatiseonsurv00boglgoog#page/n261/mode/2up

#### Mick West

Staff member
I also discovered why many of the diagrams in the scanned version of this book, and the other books above, have truncated diagrams. It seems common that surveying books of the era were normal hardback size, but with quite large fold out segments.

The semi-automated scanning process obviously did not include unfolding the maps, so you get messed up scans.

Last edited:

#### Mick West

Staff member
This section is particularly relevant to most of the surveying related Flat Earth objections.

#### Mick West

Staff member
And of course "history" extends up to the present day. I don't want people to get the idea that this is some archaic technique. The shape of the Earth has not significantly changed in the last 200 years, nor has atmospheric refraction. So the same numbers still apply.

Here's a course in surveying leveling from Fresno State Lyles College of Engineering:

The above slide shows the combined effects of curvature and refraction, at 0.574 feet per mile squared, or 6.89 inches per mile squared.

That's the same correction as given in 1908
The Principles and Practice of Surveying: Higher surveying, Charles Breed, 1908

Last edited:

#### Mick West

Staff member
But back to history, in "A Text-book of Plane Surveying", Raymond, 1901, we have:

Again the 1/7th correction. And an odd way of measuring the effect of curvature. 0.001 feet in 220 feet. So essentially .001 feet per (miles*24)^2 (as 220 feet is 1/24th of a mile). That works out as .001*24^2 = 0.576 feet per mile squared. The same as the other references.

#### Jon Leighton

##### New Member
Curvature comes up in two ways. Firstly it arises when determining latitude and longitude by observation of sun and stars. The Earth here is assumed to be a sphere, and the stars essentially fixed in a "celestial sphere" infinitely far away.

Mick,

I think spherical excess is also worthy of a mention. In general, the internal angles of any large surveyed triangle will sum to more than 180 degrees.

Then there's distance corrections including the chord to arc correction, and its inverse, the arc to chord correction.

Staff member

Staff member

#### Mick West

Staff member
Now here's a lovely book:

The Complete Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. In which the Whole Circle of Human Learning is Explained, and the Difficulties Attending the Acquisition of Every Art, Whether Liberal Or Mechanical, are Removed, in the Most Easy and Familiar Manner - 1765

A discussion of the horizon, including accounting for refraction.

And an extensive discussion of leveling

#### Mick West

Staff member
The excellent site FlatEarth.ws has a small collection of books specifically on Railways, which the Flat Earth folk sometimes claim are built without "accounting" for the curve. Of course railway construction uses leveling even more so than road construction, because the exact grade is very important to trains, which dislike even the slightest hill.

Here's the two historical books:

Field-book for Railroad Engineers – John B. Henck, 1869

A Treatise on the Principles and Practice of Levelling: Showing Its Application to Purposes of Railway Engineering and the Construction of Roads – Frederic Walter Simms — 1875

Note the use of 8 inches per mile squared as an approximation, here given in feet, since 8 inches = 8/12 = 2/3 of a foot.

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Illusions of Curvature - RC Boat Hidden on Small Pond Flat Earth 10
Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
Observations of Mallorca Island and the Earth's Curvature Flat Earth 28
Explained: Observations of Canigou, Curvature of the Earth & Atmospheric Refraction Flat Earth 158
Video of New Orleans Superdome Illustrating Curvature and Refraction Flat Earth 5
Atmospheric sunlight refraction arguments on the Eratosthenes triangulation method Flat Earth 37
Earth curvature refraction experiments - debunking flat/concave Earth Flat Earth 344
Help: Panorama Maker and the Curvature of the Earth Flat Earth 19
Beautiful Photographs that show the Earth's Curvature Flat Earth 12
Dodgy 'Earth curvature calculators' Flat Earth 4
The German WWII "Knickebein" Navigation System and the Curvature of the Earth Flat Earth 11
A real-life 2D curvature analogy and a few thoughts regarding scale Flat Earth 2
Using railways to view curvature Flat Earth 3
Proving curvature: a distant island, viewed from different heights Flat Earth 0
Observations of a Wind Farm Over the Curve of The Earth Flat Earth 0
Can You Validate Earth's Curvature with a Drone? Flat Earth 14
Claim: zooming in on setting sun proves flat earth Flat Earth 23
Using a very long water level to measure Earth's curvature Flat Earth 16
Using pin hole lenses to debunk CGI Rebuttals of Photos of Earth Curvature Flat Earth 7
A Side View of the Curvature of the Earth at Lake Pontchartrain Flat Earth 55
Can 3 towers placed equidistant at the same latitude demonstrate curvature? Flat Earth 2
Water Level Showing Mountain and Horizon Dip Due to Curvature Flat Earth 48
Claim: First Image of Space Taken from V-2 Rocket Proves the Earth is Flat Flat Earth 17
Earth Curvature Simulation by Walter Bislins Flat Earth 9
Soundly Proving the Curvature of the Earth at Lake Pontchartrain Flat Earth 91
FE balloon video curvature analysis using Blender Flat Earth 4
Explained: Why a Spirit Level on a Plane Does Not Show Curvature "Corrections" Flat Earth 98
Problem with earth curvature calculator - Hope for revised version ? Flat Earth 5
San Mateo Bridge to Bay Bridge 17 mile curvature test Flat Earth 36
Help with a debate about curvature and distance calculations Flat Earth 30
Demonstrating the curvature of the Earth by Flying in a "Straight Line" Near the Poles Flat Earth 33
Curvature of earth - the definition Flat Earth 11
Views of Toronto from Hamilton and Fort Niagara Illustrate Earth's Curvature Flat Earth 44
Can you detect the curvature of the Earth with a taut line 3 miles long? [No] Flat Earth 55
Earth curvature: Differences with Sphere/Ellipsoid/Geoid models for Visibility etc Flat Earth 8
Ships beyond the horizon - Earth curvature demonstration Flat Earth 7
Greenwich Meridian Laser - Can it Demonstrate Curvature? Flat Earth 20
Stephen Hawking's "Genius" Helicopter Demonstration of Lake Curvature Flat Earth 27
Measuring the Curvature of the Horizon with a Level Flat Earth 121
Curvature Experiment showing relation between x-axis and z-axis Flat Earth 15
Seemingly Conflicting Curvature Observations in the Scottish Islands [Misidentified Islands] Flat Earth 6
Folsom Lake Photographs Demonstrating the Curvature of the Earth Flat Earth 36
Lake Balaton Laser experiment to determine the curvature of the Earth, if any. Flat Earth 1027
Does the Earth's Curvature Vary with Latitude? [No, not significantly] Flat Earth 34
Infra red cameras and curvature? Flat Earth 11
Crepuscular angles and the flat idea. Flat Earth 48
Selenelion Eclipses Flat Earth 3
Flat Earth and Refraction with Oil Platforms Hillhouse and Habitat Flat Earth 5
A question about refraction Flat Earth 5
Does google earth pro simulate refraction [No] Flat Earth 7
Related Articles