Claim: Retracted paragraph suggests Rockefeller killed to prevent cancer cure

Qualiall

Member

Attachments

  • 10433907_788033517895073_3179414137700280612_n.jpg
    10433907_788033517895073_3179414137700280612_n.jpg
    121.5 KB · Views: 863
Last edited by a moderator:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
What's this illuminutti.com reference doing there?



It appears fake. The spacing is off, and the text does not flow under that photo (although that could be browser dependent)



Compression artifacts are different in this block of text (lacking color). Could be coincidence, but also could indicate editing:


Also the "Last Update" time is unchanged (still "Last Updated Jun 13, 2014 12:51 PM EDT" in the current story)
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Hmm, I retract the bit about the text flowing, there's extra text in the current version.

Still looks rather dubious though.
 

jaydeehess

Senior Member.
Even if true cancer research such as this does not occur in a vacuum. There would be doctoral candidates, lab assistants who'd have been working with him and quite cognizant of his research.
In addition he would not be the only researcher following this or similar paths.

Are they going to kill them all?
 

Hevach

Senior Member.
Based on a google search, there are hundreds of people studying immuno-oncology, including some big pharmaceutical companies. It's a promising and potentially lucrative field with billions in research money flying around. "They" would need no less than massacres to slow it down. All of the Big Four recently threw 1.3 billion at IO research, so "Big Pharma" would be burning a major investment to stop it now.
 

jaydeehess

Senior Member.
The title claims removal of a paragraph, a single paragraph " proves" a conspiracy to set cancer research back. The OP instead points out the supposed removal and, rather than explain how this "proves" anything, instead simply asks why?

JAQing proves absolutely nothing at all.
 
Top