I suppose Chomsky will be talking a load of 'bunk' in this video though.
Full video at link.
So you are saying that you agree with Chomsky in this video, but you think we won't because we are all government cheer-leaders, hence our agreeing with Chomsky in the first video should be taken as simply and agreement of convenience? We are just happy someone with stature agrees with us, so we wheel him out, but our trick is revealed by us not agreeing with something else he said. Is that it?
Does that also mean that because you DON'T agree with Chomsky in the first video, then we should think you are lying about agreeing with him here?
And I actually DO agree with Chomsky in the second video.