Brazilian UFO Flap of 1986 - "Night of Lights" / "Official UFO Night"

The "Night of Lights" refers to the yet unexplained events that occurred in Brazil, starting at sunset on August 18 until the dawn of August 19, 1986. The observables were described as "scintillating, bright stars that sparkled with high intensity and shifting colors while performing incredible maneuvers". Witnesses include Air traffic controllers, Radar operators, Civilians, Commercial Pilots, and Brazilian Airforce Pilots. The Lights and radar plots were observed over 5 Brazilian states: Goiás, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Paraná. The lights were filmed by several civilians, including professional cameramen from Newstations and Advertisement agencies.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_Brazilian_UFO_incident

On the night of that Monday, 21 unidentified flying objects were observed across the country. The "OVNIs", the Brazilian acronym used to designate "unidentified flying objects," were initially detected by radars from the Integrated Air Defense and Air Traffic Control Center (Cindacta - Brazil's NORAD).



Around 8 PM, about two thousand military personnel, including cadets and officers from the Aeronautics Specialist School (EEAR), witnessed the phenomenon, either with the naked eye or through binoculars. The phenomena were detected by radar and by sight by the São José airport's control tower. Air traffic controller, Sergeant Sérgio Mota da Silva, noticed the mysterious spectacle and alerted a twin-engine Xingu aircraft, which was prompted to attempt identification on the lights. The pilot was Colonel Ozires Silva, founder of EMBRAER, who was returning from a meeting with the President of the Republic. The attempt at identifying the crafts ceased after the lights suddenly vanished, as "lights that were turned off". Ozires would later state that if the objects had not been confirmed and detected by radar, he would rather never have confirmed or commented on his sighting. "I was a pilot for many years and had never seen anything like that. It was too agile; it was impossible for a human to be inside it. I don't know if it was a disc, but it had a very strong glow." At least two other commercial aircraft reported sightings that night.




The emergence of new and dynamic moving UFOs led the head of the Air Defense Operations Center (CODA), Major Ney Antunes Cerqueira, to order two interception operations by F-5E Tiger II and Dassault Mirage III fighters, one departing from the Santa Cruz Air Base (BASC) in Rio de Janeiro, and the other from the Anápolis Air Base (BAAN) in Goiás. In total, five fighters were dispatched: two F-5Es from BASC and three Mirage F-103s from BAAN. The combat aircraft received the same mission: non-aggressive interception—meaning that, although they were equipped with heavy armament, they would attempt a peaceful approach. They were unsuccessful.



According to the airmen, the multicolored points were able to hover statically in the sky, fly in a zigzag pattern, make right-angle turns, change color, trajectory, and altitude, reaching speeds of up to 15 times the speed of sound. One particular flight, the Mirage F-103 named Jaguar 98 piloted by Rodolfo da Silva Souza, was tailgated by a UFO. The radar operators reported through radiocom: "The (radar)plot is always at your 6 o'clock, okay? When you turn, it's always turning in front of you, coming towards you, passing above or below you— we can't detect altitude— and it stays on your tail the whole time. When you turn, it disappears from that position and always reappears in front of you."

About 800 km away, in Goiás, Captain Viriato flew the Mirage F-103 named Jaguar 116. After flying at subsonic speed for seven minutes, the pilot was informed of a contact 13 nautical miles (24.07 km) ahead. The aircraft's radar also detected the target. Viriatp turned off the navigation lights and attempted to approach, managing to get to just 1 nautical mile (1.85 km) from the target after eighteen minutes of flight when the point inexplicably disappeared from the onboard radar screen. Guided by this, the pilot performed a 360° scan of the area, and a new contact appeared on the radar 12.5 miles (23.15 km) away. Accelerating to Mach 0.9 (1,100 km/h), the pilot reduced the distance to 10 miles (18.52 km); for a moment, the separation between the fighter and the UFO increased again but soon decreased to 5 nautical miles (9.26 km) when the object abruptly accelerated, increasing the distance to 21 nautical miles (38.89 km) within seconds, thus going out of the interceptor's radar range. The captain managed to repeat the feat of getting to just 1 nautical mile (1.85 km) from another UFO after accelerating to a supersonic speed of Mach 1.05 (1,296.54 km/h), but the object also accelerated and quickly disappeared. Despite the close proximity, the hunter saw nothing with the naked eye. Near the end of the flight, frustrated, Freitas asked the controller if the other hunters had the same contacts under the same circumstances, which was confirmed by the interlocutor: "Affirmative. The same conditions: there's a contact, you get close to the contact, and it increases the distance."

The Phenomena was last sighted and detected heading towards the Atlantic Ocean.

As the sightings were widespread, so was the news. Several newspapers honed in the story, of which the armed forces still had no official say. Many camera crews were able to register part of the events on videotape. The best image was done by Heraldo Canalles, who was filming an advertisement with his crew on the rooftop of a building on São João Avenue, in the center of São Paulo city. The shape of the object appeared to be a full moon. The cameraman made sure to also film the Moon, which was in the waning quarter that night. The UFO was observed (both in video and by the witnesses) as a stationary "rotating sphere" suspended in the night sky that spanned on its own axis while its color shifted from green, to orange and pink.



On May 23, the then Minister of Aeronautics, Brigadier General Octávio Júlio Moreira Lima, held a press conference with the five fighter pilots and 2radar operators, confirming the occurred events. Moreira Lima was arguably 'mocked' by a journalist, who asked if he believed in "Little Green Men, ETs and Flying-saucers"; his response was "It's not about believing or not [in extraterrestrial beings or flying discs]. We can only provide technical information. There are various assumptions. Technically, I would tell you that we have no explanation." By the end of the confidence, an official report was announced to be addressed to the press, but such a document was never received. As a result of the authorities' first official statement on the subject, the incidents of that night became known as the "Official UFO Night."



On September 25th 2009, after the 2004 "Brazilian FOIA on UFO Files" request, the official report from the Brazilian Air Force on the case that was promised in the conference back in 1986, was declassified and released. It was indeed written but withheld, for reasons undisclosed. On its final page is written: "As a conclusion of the observed facts, in almost all presentations, this Command is of the opinion that the phenomena are solid and, in a certain way, reflect intelligence due to their ability to accompany and maintain distance from the observers, as well as to fly in formation, not necessarily being piloted." The official report is available to be read in the National Archives.



In October 2015, the National Archive made 16 audio recordings available. Among these are eight recordings of conversations between pilots and air traffic controllers, as well as the Brazilian defense system, from the night of May 19, 1986. The audios indicate that dozens of objects were detected by radar, observed multiple times, and chased by pilots, demonstrating unusual behaviors throughout the entire episode. The recordings are available to be listened to in the National Archives, and some are uploaded on YouTube.


Sources:
  1. https://www.gov.br/en/government-of-brazil/latest-news/2022/official-ufo-night-in-brazil
  2. https://g1.globo.com/ciencia/notici...ro-e-foram-perseguidos-por-cacas-da-fab.ghtml
  3. https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noite_dos_discos_voadores
  4. https://vigilia.com.br/brasilia-boa-noite-bem-vindo-ao-festival-dos-discos-voadores/
  5. https://tokdehistoria.com.br/2016/0...completa-30-anos-sem-ter-misterio-desvendado/
  6. https://economia.uol.com.br/todos-a-bordo/2021/05/18/noite-oficial-ovnis-35-anos.htm

  7. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYEGLlulW2w

  8. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neUQC0rd60I

  9. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZbW8xsJakA



This one is a hard nut to crack.
Moreira Lima once stated that this could be an advanced enemy cyber-warfare tactic, which could explain the amazing radar plots - but he had no hypothesis for the observable lights.
 
Last edited:
they look like flares.

the "worm" looking photo is just something that happens with camera shake. this was proven by some UFO investigators - The UFO Hunters (Tubi tv link below)-in another case "Stephenville UFO"
a bit off topic, as this occurred january 19th in Stephenville (as part of the flap), but i see @Mick West has a thread on squiggley lines, and the UFO Hunters do debunk with experiments the "squiggle/ribbon ufo" claim in Stephenville.
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...ctions-squiggly-lines-and-dancing-dots.12802/


stephenville (14 mins of video from claimant) but generally looks like this:
examples 13:50-13:55ish
1714014114950.png


unnecessarily complicated debunk 17:45-19:00
"camera was in night mode and it was taking longer exposures per frame"
1714014342431.png
1714014605093.png

add:
1729433600437.png


https://tubitv.com/tv-shows/490040/s01-e10-invasion-texas-2008
 
I appreciate the insight but I find it hard to believe that 21 flares of any kind would be shot over a 2000 miles area within Brazil by another national military force without communicating with the air force, performing the maneuvers seen and registered by radar, and then proceed to outrun jets capable of supersonic flight until meeting their end in the Atlantic ocean.


A violation of Brazilian airspace by other Nations is highly more probable than military flares, swamp gas, and unregistered balloons.

The problem would be the visual appearance of the alleged invaders, described as "shining, scintillant stars that changed color" and their unexpected maneuvers and performance. Although in 1986 the leader in aviation had advanced craft that could reach Mach 4, the speeds registered by inboard radar and by the CINDACTA saw accelerations that reached almost four times that speed.

An explanation would be different sets of aircraft that reached below the threshold of radar detection while another set of aircraft entered it, with the same vector and radar plot size but further away.... a fairly complicated maneuver by several unidentified adversarial craft for an unrequested visitation of sovereign airspace.
 
Last edited:
I appreciate the insight but I find it hard to believe that 21 flares
yea im not interested in ufos enough to spend 10 hours examining this case. (esp. since i think we already discussed this on MB a few years ago). Your pictures you posted look like flares.
 
yea im not interested in ufos enough to spend 10 hours examining this case. (esp. since i think we already discussed this on MB a few years ago).

I did a forum search before posting it here; this case wasn't present.

Your pictures you posted look like flares.
Can you post a picture of a flare that looks like what the camera crew filmed so that we can make a comparison?

2 of the pictures are simulations made with CGI, I think that was somewhat obvious but it's in good nature to point
 
Can you post a picture of a flare that looks like what the camera crew filmed so that we can make a comparison?
the last pic looks like some weird microscope picture of the inside of a computer. I dont even see a moon. certainly i wasnt suggesting that one looks like a flare. Is that the best a professional camera crew could come up with?

as far as cgi, what's the point of posting them if they dont represent what was seen?
 
the last pic looks like some weird microscope picture of the inside of a computer. I dont even see a moon. certainly i wasnt suggesting that one looks like a flare. Is that the best a professional camera crew could come up with?
I suppose you didn't watch the provided videos with the footage you're criticizing, huh


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gl3qZC7F-n0


as far as cgi, what's the point of posting them if they dont represent what was seen?
Why do you think the CGI doesn't represent what was seen? lol
 
I suppose you didn't watch the provided videos with the footage you're criticizing, huh
nope. there was no way to know what "source" went with what bit of your essay. you also gave no timestamps or transcripts/explanations of your videos.

Why do you think the CGI doesn't represent what was seen? lol
I don't. You're the one that questioned why i said they looked like flares. i thought you were saying "they only look like flares because those are cgi fake photos"
 
nope. there was no way to know what "source" went with what bit of your essay. you also gave no timestamps or transcripts/explanations of your videos.
Fair enough, my bad. The footage is in the aforementioned video from the post you just quoted, starting at 6:45.
There are translatable captions available. They are uninspiring at best, given the available resolution - for it to be interesting, you would have to trust the testimony of the camera crew. For us who didn't see it live, it's merely a really bright star that outshines the rest of the sky.

I don't. You're the one that questioned why i said they looked like flares. i thought you were saying "they only look like flares because those are cgi fake photos"
Oh, no.
I don't think the description given by the witnesses nor the CGI reconstruction of how they looked like seems like flares. The circumstances (chased by jetfighter, radar reflection, distance traveled, etc) completely throw this hypothesis out of the question too. As I've stated before on the topic, a more reasonable explanation would be an unprovoked and unclaimed adversarial incursion with yet undisclosed tech.
 
Oh, no.
I don't think the description given by the witnesses nor the CGI reconstruction of how they looked like seems like flares. The circumstances (chased by jetfighter, radar reflection, distance traveled, etc) completely throw this hypothesis out of the question too. As I've stated before on the topic, a more reasonable explanation would be an unprovoked and unclaimed adversarial incursion with yet undisclosed tech.

What undisclosed tech? All we have is stories.
 
What undisclosed tech? All we have is stories.
A secret next-gen aircraft with unseen tech created by the US military is more probable and plausible than flying saucers of unknown origin - that's what I meant.

The problem is that we have yet to identify this hypothetical tech hypothetically employed in 1986
 
Last edited:
I don't think the description given by the witnesses nor the CGI reconstruction of how they looked like seems like flares
as far as flares looking like those cgi things..there are the phoenix lights photos, and this one as just a couple examples. Granted people still deny they were flares in those instances but that is another debate. i think they are flares and i think that's what flares look like

https://www.metabunk.org/threads/twentynine-palms-camp-wilson-triangle-uap-flares.12967/
1729616172972.png
 
Brazilian Science Influencer Sergio Sacani claims that he spoke with one of the pilots in 1998 and the pilot confirmed that the supposed UFOs were in fact sprites.


Source: https://youtu.be/zxg78pOsick?t=212


Sacani is a geophysicist and used to work for a UFO magazine in the 90s, even though he has always remained a skeptic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprite_(lightning)

Also, it is important to notice that Brazilian traffic control had a terrible reputation until very recently. In 2006 there was a big crisis in traffic control and it was exposed that they had terrible equipment and radars had a lot of problems (like showing plots for non-existing objects, double plots for a single aircraft, etc).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006–2007_Brazilian_aviation_crisis

What I think happened is this. Some kind of electric storm caused a disturbance on the traffic control radar. The brazilian air force sent the pilots to chase fake plots. The pilots were caught in the middle of some sort of meteorological anomaly and started to imagine things.

One important support for this theory is that neighbour countries like Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina didn't report anything. It would be impossible for UFOs to escape brazilian territory and not be seen by other traffic control.

Brazil had not participated in a war since WWII and had never experienced any attack on its territory since the XIX century. Military crew probably didn't have enough experience and nobody was expecting an operation like this.

Spectators on land were simply moved by mass hysteria caused by TV that was already reporting on the story.

Soon after the famous press conference, the Air force discovered that they f*cked up but decided to simply stay quiet and avoid more embarassment. Brazil had just transitioned from a military dictatorship and was living a serious economic crisis (70% inflation a year) the Armed Forces were already under serious criticism and had to protect their reputation.
 
Back
Top