BBC: "Too much weight to fringe views", says review

JFDee

Senior Member.
This is not directly about debunking, but it allows a glimpse into media behaviour and mechanisms:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/jul/20/bbc-climate-change-science-coverage

The BBC is to revamp its science coverage after an independent review highlighted weaknesses and concluded that journalists boosted the apparent controversy of scientific news stories such as climate change, GM crops and the MMR vaccine by giving too much weight to fringe scientific viewpoints.
...
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
That is great news! The "false balance" thing has been a particular bugbear of mine:
Jones likened the BBC's approach to oppositional debates to asking a mathematician and maverick biologist what two plus two equals. When the mathematician says four and the maverick says five, the public are left to conclude the answer is somewhere in between

Exactly.
 

JFDee

Senior Member.
Now, the BBC can be said to be high on the scale of honesty and reputation. And yet I am not convinced that it was only "impartiality" which is named here as the issue. Controversy is just way more interesting than consensus, and documentary programs have to include overdramatized mysteries and big open questions nowadays. The fight for market share seems to dictate that style.

I see it pop up increasingly at the public broadcasting corporation where I'm employed, and I see it overflow at the commercial competition.

In short, I'm skeptical about the outlook for improvement in the long term.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Yes, I can't say I hold out much hope for the media in general. But this is certainly a step in the right direction.

Public broadcasting (i.e the BBC) is a lot bigger in the UK than in the US, so this is quite significant.
 

Ross Marsden

Senior Member.
There seems to be a pervasive view that all opinions are equally valid. This was not always the case. Somebody or some movement has advanced it so that it is part of modern thinking.
It is patently not true. Some opinions are just rubbish.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Teertskcab Why Don't Cloud Formations Change Much in DSCOVR animations? Flat Earth 4
FolsomG10 Does Zooming in Change How Much of Something is Hidden by the Horizon [No] Flat Earth 54
B Claim: Flu vaccine from multi-dose vials Use Too Much Mercury Health and Quackery 19
skephu How much do contrails reduce the energy from solar cells? Contrails and Chemtrails 4
R How much blood should there be here? Boston Marathon Bombings 7
NikTesla How Much Water is there in Jet Engine Exhaust? [About 1.3 Gallons per Gallon of Fuel Used] Contrails and Chemtrails 67
Oxymoron How much of the Smoke Around WTC7 actually from WTC7? 9/11 20
Mick West How Much Does Metabunk.org Cost to Run? Site Feedback & News 17
Cairenn How much does a storm weigh? Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Mick West How Much Money Does Alex Jones Make? People Debunked 17
HappyMonday CLAIM: "air at altitude doesn't deviate much statewide at any given time" Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Mick West What would it take, and how much would it cost, to test a "chemtrail" Contrails and Chemtrails 44
Mick West Engine Efficiency, High Bypass, and Contrail Frequency - How much? Contrails and Chemtrails 9
Mick West Cody's Lab: How Weight Changes With Location and Velocity Flat Earth 35
MikeC Aircraft weight and balance in the real world Contrails and Chemtrails 5
Mick West WTC Collapses: what type, weight, num, explosive, detonation would have to be used? 9/11 70

Related Articles

Top