Aluminium concentrations

Misterfreeman87

New Member
Unnormal high concentrations of Aluminium seem to play an importan role in the Chemtrail Theory. They claim, that Aluminium concentrations of around 0,1mg/l are absolutely unnormal and could only be explained by Chemtrails. This is, of course, not true. I did some research and found Aluminium measurements from 1995, thus before they, supposedly, started "spraying chemtrails".

The European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) is measuring air pollution and has also been measuring Aluminium concentrations in the air and in the precipitation in severel measuring stations throughout Europe for several years. Using their database one can find Aluminium measurements going back to 1995: http://ebas.nilu.no/

I ve made a screenshot from their oldest measurements which date back to 1995 and stem from two stations in Northern Germany: http://fs1.directupload.net/images/150602/sxlvptuf.jpg

As you can see, they measured concentrations of up to 0,214mg/l , thus higher than most concentrations measured by Chemtrail "Scientist"!!

One shoudl also note, that concentrations of up to 0,2mg/l are no problem, as even the german ´drinking water ordinance´ allows Aluminium concentrations of up to 0,2mg/l (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinkwasserverordnung)
 

Henk001

Senior Member.
Just stumbled across the website Chemtrails Project UK. They invite you to buy a rain water sample kit and they also publish the results of these tests on an interactive map (http://www.chemtrailsprojectuk.com/evidence/rainwater-test-kit-results-map/). Clicking around on a few dozen of these results I noticed that Ba, Sr were hardly detected at all and [Al] is never above 0,2 mg/L. So, in a way they are disproving their own claim that these substances are being sprayed:D
 

jonnyH

Senior Member.
Clicking around on a few dozen of these results I noticed that Ba, Sr were hardly detected at all and [Al] is never above 0,2 mg/L. So, in a way they are disproving their own claim that these substances are being sprayed
yet rather than accept the obvious, they move the goalposts:
 

skephu

Senior Member.
"The same standard should not be applied to rainwater." -- I agree with that. We typically don't drink rainwater, so we should not expect that it is drinking water quality.
 

Henk001

Senior Member.
yet rather than accept the obvious, they move the goalposts:
Well, that's very easy to refute, as we have seen in other threads: soil contains Al, dust in the air contains soil, rainwater contains dust, so rain water will contain Al.
 

Trailblazer

Moderator
Staff member
yet rather than accept the obvious, they move the goalposts:

Perhaps we should encourage people to test a nice hot cup of tea too?

upload_2015-7-3_11-23-53.png

http://www.eurchembull.com/index.php/ECB/article/view/110

4.40 mg/l for black tea infusion. That's 4,400 µg/l, or more than four times higher than even the highest of their rainwater readings!

upload_2015-7-3_11-25-50.png
 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
CP UK debunk their own claims. They claim that samples should be taken 100 miles away from a coal fired power station. There is nowhere on the mainland that distance away.
 
Top