José de la Cruz attended that session, but he didn't give any speech. He was just sitting among the audience. He never stopped supporting Jaime Maussan. Days after I exposed his "paper", he appeared on YouTube saying it was a mistake that will soon be "corrected", and added that the main conclusion is that those "beings" need more research.Following up on this point.
Setting aside the reputation of the journal, Lopez's article concludes that Josefina's skull is a llama. It was published in 2021, three years after he presented to Congress in Peru where he provided "evidence" the mummy was real and didn't attempt to compare the skull to a llama.
(I've seen some confusion where he was thought to also present the aliens at the 2023 Mexico hearing but this isn't true - they were presented by Jois Mantilla. Presumably Lopez's initial work was included there, though obviously not his later llama-work.)
So the question is: what's his current position on Josefina? Is he out from under Maussan's influence now? Otherwise, why write the paper saying the mummy is a hoax?
His current position never changed. He supported and supports Jaime Maussan, he bombs the internet with insults towards all scientists that debunk this hoax by calling them "ignorants".