I'm happy to let your grumpy ramblings stand as your response to my specific points, but I don't consider them actually responsive (and nor, I suspect, would anyone who actually follows this dialogue).
No disrespect benthamitemetric, but I've been following this dialogue very closely, and I'm afraid to me it's clear Tony is talking sense.
I am sure you are sincere in your beliefs but I wonder if you have lost sight of the big picture here. You are not obliged to defend the official 9/11 story. I think your moral obligation extends only to the defence truth. Are you sure you are really being truthful?