Do all the other problems mean nothing to you? You asked me earlier if I knew about the C79 change of direction. Is this no longer relevant?
Of course it is. But it isn't clear what Dr Hulsey is actually stating here. And it is similarly not clear what difference at times is being highlighted. This is the problem with interim reports.
But for you to start a thread claiming to have debunked this is just nonsense. You haven't debunked anything. You cannot claim on one hand not to have enough data or context to properly scrutinise it, then claim to have debunked it on the basis of the same available data.
You have jumped the gun in a very big way making that claim Mick.
Debunk page 48 please.