"4k UFOs Video" in the Serra do Rio Rastro, in Brazil. Probably insects?

[BoulderRiver]

I came across this recent video from wanzamhobby Drone, titled "DRONE registra 3 OVINIs sem QUERER na SERRA" (which roughly translates to "DRONE accidentally records 3 UFOs in the mountains".

This is the location of the footage:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/R4MUk7Q7juXJqFvw5

Frankly, it appears to be specs of dust, pollen, and even insects that are moving fast due to parallax.
But I Thought it would be in good tone to post it here




wanzamhobby Drone:
https://www.youtube.com/@wanzamhobby


"DRONE registra 3 OVINIs sem QUERER na SERRA"


The author's further 'investigations'

 

[Ravi]

Frankly, it appears to be specs of dust, pollen, and even insects that are moving fast due to parallax.
But I Thought it would be in good tone to post it here

Correct. And the lighting (direction of the sun) is such that the insects are in direct sunlight, contrasting to the darker unlit background. Classic.

 

[Giddierone]

Maybe ballooning spiders?
But there's a weird bit where it seems to disappear without breaking the dark line of the road (at another point it clearly does pass over the road), so maybe just a video issue.

 

[Ann K]

It's a spectacular view (I enjoyed that bit!) but in a number of places there seems to be a smooth pan past the scenery while the moving objects jerk-jerk-jerk regularly. Is that an artifact of photography, or is it indicative of fakery? Another possibility (maybe) is birds with flapping wings, only visible at the point in the stroke where the light catches the wings, but I don't think that I see anything at all between bright spots, so that's probably not it.

 

[jarlrmai]

It's just similar enough to the background at that point that the compression vanishes it.

 

[TK85]

Maybe ballooning spiders?
But there's a weird bit where it seems to disappear without breaking the dark line of the road (at another point it clearly does pass over the road), so maybe just a video issue.

It shows up in the 4k render from YT. I'm guessing the embedded version here plays at 720p or 1080p by default.

 

[JJB]

Looks like a framerate type of deal to me ie camera artifact. Insects or maybe birds?

 

[elvenwear]

They seem to like the edges of the mountain (where the updrafts would likely be). That tips me more in the direction of birds.

At least the thing they called a UFO was unidentified, flying and an object. Nothing to be upset about here.

 

[FatPhil]

At least the thing they called a UFO was unidentified, flying and an object. Nothing to be upset about here.

If all they had intended to communicate was that it was unidentified, flying, and an object, then they should have used the words não identificados, voadores, and objetos. Instead, by chosing the initialism they are bringing in all of the baggage associated with that term. That's not a reason to get upset, but it's a justification for pointing a finger at them.