Search results

Ok I see where you heading, the occurrence depends on Temperature, RHI, mixing ration and wind speed and maybe some other condition we dont know. The data only suggest that the RHI is a necessity but not sufficiency condition, for extremly long contrails.

My whole argumentation was built on those 8 points.

Actually you can dig out the temperature and RHI for each point (duration about 200 min and more).

Probably RHi must be ajusted about the factor 1.8*Rhi, because radiosonds underestimates the RHi at those low temperatures.

Ok, thanks for your response. Maybe you could give further information about, whats confusing. The main argument is, that we would expect a different pattern of messurements on the RHI-duration diagramm at duration >150 minutes, if those 2 discussed statements would be true.

I`m wondering about the lack of reaction. Is there a problem with correctness, clearness or relevance in the argumentation?

I will show, that 2 central satements on Chemtrails are not likely to be true on the same time by analysing scientific data on 506 contrails in Alaska Fairbanks. http://akclimate.org/sites/default/files//papers/Wendler2005.pdf Common Chemtrail Believer Statements: 1)Chemtrails (long lasting...