Search results

Interesting! It also seems that the new narrative struck a chord with him because it was also critical of the government. Which shows that debunking and counter-narrating works better if you have (or find) a common ground to start from.

Totally agree. Thank you for this post. As an advocate of animal welfare, I hate the pseudoscience a lot of vegans and vegetarians believe in. And this is only the tip of the iceberg lettuce.

Mick, you should have been a teacher.

That or Cthulhu. Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!

First off, disgusting! But what are they even trying to imply with the accent? He's obviously British. So what? Is he a threat to American indipendence? Are they afraid Mick is in Her Majesty's service?

Yeah. It's like a reverse "argument from authority".

Not to godwin this, but Nazi antisemitism is the CT par excellence. Stalin's later cleansings and adversity to doctors could also be considered CT (as Daniel Pipes does). I do get your point, though, he's using it to explain failure in advance and to mobilize his followers. But even in that...

In the USA, maybe.

It appears to be out of print (at least not available in Europe). Do you know if there's a going to be a reprint or a second edition? It would be timely, for sure.

Maybe they are afraid too much extertion would make them breathe heavier and inhale more chemicals.

How is that a "March"? They literally were sitting.

I coincidentally followed this woman's development on a German forum (allmystery). She was in deep, believed in the most absurd claims and came up with the most unreasonable responses. Then, a few months later, you would see her commenting sceptically about chemtrails, and showing more and more...

Oh nice, free vacation. Gotta get me some gofundme money as well.

That has not gone unnoticed, of course. I've already seen it mentioned at a German CT forum.

Once again, the pattern seems to be conspiracy theorists comparing an exceptional case (in this case: an apparent accident) against a norm they have set up themselves (in this case: the claim of the flight path being exceptional). With this kind of methodology, they will always successfully...

Is dutch trolling his viewers?

Yes, you would use "der Untermensch" when talking about the abstract (yet personified) concept, just as in your examples "the Jew", "the American". You would use "die Untermenschen" to speak of a more concrete group of people you want to point out as being "untermenschlich." Similarly, "the Jew...

Just one little correction: Untermensch is not gender neutral, it's masculine: der Untermensch, and plural: die Untermenschen. Compare for: der Mensch. Apparently, Germans consider typical human beings (Menschen) to be male. But then again, the English word for Mensch is man. For all your...

Yeah, but those two are basically attention seekers.

Huh? The mere existence of HAARP now is some kind of win? Was that ever even put into question?