Search results

Traditional definitions of "liberal" have become useless. So has any understanding of the "media" from more than a few years ago. The internet has changed things about how the "media" functions and reacts.

Yes. This sort of thinking has gone beyond conspiracy-believers, as we have previously narrowly described them. It describes whole swaths of population which aren't traditional CTers. It seems to be based on emotional reactions instead of logical thinking. That which came to exist without use of...

I meant "older" in terms of not a child... and adult. Are there accepted guidelines on that? Don't know when I would be in a position to ask an actual doctor.

I have a separate question. If an older person thinks they never had measles or mumps, should they be vaccinated against them now?

Wasn't sure where to find this info, so I'll just ask here. I see some claims going around that vaccinated people are the ones infecting the unvaccinated people. Is that possible at all?

Apparently you overlooked this part:

Interesting. Thanks. This part caught my eye: I found that quite a surprise. So that means organic particles, or am I misunderstanding something?

OK, but what has to be present for natural cirrus clouds to form? Where does the initial nucleus come from?

Yes, and the number of "science writers" who re-published the story about it.

I'm not sure I fully understand that. Could you elaborate?

Would this mean that there are areas of atmosphere which are devoid of condensation nuclei?

No. This thread is to highlight actual THREATS. "His idea was to cause fear so tough luck." You can't be serious. That is totalitarian thinking. This whole thing reeks of it. "Mo Jo bag"?? It's meaningless! I don't care how stupid or wrong he is. I will defend his right to speak his mind. The...

Wow. No matter how much of a nutbar he is, I think it's over the top to be arrested and charged for having an innocuous power as a part of a visual display. He wasn't throwing the power at people, or something like that, was he?

I arrived at the conclusion, some time ago, that various conspiracy theory believers basically believe in exactly that... CONSPIRACY, above all else. They are unable to accept information which would take away that basic belief. The reasons for that are multiple. It seems to involve a need to...

No one says there are not trails in the sky or that they don't contribute to cloud cover. That's not the argument. The argument is over the contents of the trails. I have seen no reason to believe that the contents of the trails is anything other than the contents of ordinary contrails. Why...

First, UN members don't have the habit of interrupting speeches. Second, Peterson was NOT addressing the UN. It was simply an address HOSTED at that facility. PS: I see I'm late to this thread. This has probably already been stated.

I experienced this way back with Nancy Lieder and the "planet X" debacle(which still sees her soldiering on, by the way). She would tell people to "look for yourselves", but that didn't result in people actually looking for themselves. It resulted in people seeing her suggestion as confirmation...

He is being cited as a source of science and truth on a constant basis by chemtrail believers.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeJKSThfk5U Al Darfco2 days ago (edited) Time to start shooting down these spray planes, trace who authorized the flights and then HANG THEM.

Impossible. We can only hope to teach the skills needed to separate shit from Shinola.