Search results

It might also be helpful to explain that if these contrails were indeed chaff, every ATC, TCAS and weather radar screen in the vicinity would show them. Additionally, explaining what chaff is, what a deployment looks like, and what it does will help clarify her misunderstanding.

This still cracks me up. Maybe I'll start referring to my work as "farting".

Not just "now", but for more than 60 years, at least. WMI has been in business for that long. http://weathermodification.com/

I guess I would be labeled as a centrist?

Do you have a link to that?

LOL! THAT was incredible. Yes, I believe that will be low enough!

I've seen the first two above before, will now bookmark them for future use, thanks. As to the last one, I have also seen it too. Serious stones, both of them. When that pilot is done with his military service, he could have a bright future ahead of him flying ag, if he can slow it down, oh...

I'm guessing this is addressed to me, and yes, I am. No, I do not tire of telling that to 'chemtrail' believers. I actually enjoy telling them that it is ridiculous when they say that they can smell 'chemtrails' within minutes or hours of seeing one pass overhead, when it will take several...

(**)P.P.S.: Anecdotal -- some Flight Attendants that I used to work with (when I was a pilot for a major U.S.-based airline) would jokingly refer to the term "crop dusting" when they happened to walk down the aisle between seats, in the cabin, and let out a fart. So, that could also, in a very...

Or, like in the case of Kristen Meghan, she states that she is a chemtrail believer, then goes on to her claims of whistleblowing about USAF personnel and overexposure to carcinogens on bases where she has worked. These claims then somehow get morphed into her being a 'chemtrail' whistleblower...

At 4:58 she mentions persistent jet contrails, and how she believes they are affecting photosysnthesis by reducing sunlight. She did not include the word ‘normal’, but that would be a redundancy. She says ‘persistent jet contrails’ a few seconds later when referencing NASA’s explanation of how...

SHE is not debunked. The title of the video, "Chemtrails, Here is your PROOF 100% Real "MUST WATCH" " (as it appears on youtube) is what is debunked. Mick was generalizing this, as the same video appears in multiple social media locations with similar misleading titles. If you actually watch...

Now THAT is a beautiful aircraft.

I believe they will avoid the "how" in the series like the plague. The "how" is demonstrably impossible, thereby destroying their entire movement.

Interesting. Without seeing a photo or having a consensus agreement of what it was that you saw, I can tell you I am highly skeptical of fuselage mounted tanks, simply for the weight and balance issue that would create. Also, it doesn't make sense for creating contrail-sized trails either, as...

Woody, this was my first thought after reading your description. Did the aircraft match either of these? The first is a Learjet, the middle an A-10, the one on the right is an MD-80 If none of these aircraft match what you saw and you maintain that they were indeed external tanks, how much...

Wrong year, my bad. Was going off memory there. Yes, I understand that it was a portion of the building, but it is also my understanding (could be wrong) that each part of that building had its own foundation, along with firewalls that prevented the spread to those other sections. This is...

Jazzy, have you ever compared the collapse of WTC 1, 2, or 7 to the fire and collapse of the Faculty of Architecture building at Delft University in 2005? My limited understanding is that it was a 12 floor steel structure, no concrete reinforcement, that burned from a fire started by a coffee...

Correct, but that also negates much of the argument of chemtrail vs contrail, as they believe they can pick them apart. Either they are 100% contrail, or they are 99.99% contrail, yet they claim that the 'normal' contrails will dissipate quickly. If so, 99.99% of the 'chemtrails' will also...

With those dimensions, the maximum hypothetical volume that could be put out by the highest capacity aircraft (747) would be less than 1 gallon of liquid sprayed over an area equivalent to the size of an American football field. There is not an aircraft on this planet that has the capacity to...