A few days ago, the term “resilient cities” popped up in a Washington Post story about yet another government official going public with his conspiracy beliefs. A little research into the term reveals a 2013 initiative that doesn’t have even a passing resemblance to a conspiracy. [My emphasis] https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...a7f68bff0fc_story.html?utm_term=.5e7c5e6d63de I have never heard the term “resilient cities” before. The Post article traced it to Deborah Tavares, who also uses the term “kill cities” and claims that a Jewish-backed conspiracy is dedicated to depopulating urban centers through weather control, with the end goal being: “The restructuring of North America.” https://www.aircrap.org/2018/02/10/kill-cities-deborah-tavares-rothschilds-plans-america/ Tavares is taking the program 100 Resilient Cities and twisting it into a pretzel. The actual 100 Resilient Cities website elaborates on the purpose of the program: http://www.100resilientcities.org/about-us/#section-2 It goes on further to explain: http://www.100resilientcities.org/resources/ To accomplish all this, the program asks city governments to pledge 10% of the budgets to projects like: “deep energy retrofits,” “participatory budgeting,” and “neighborhood revitalization.” The Rockefeller Foundation is matching this funding with a total of $164 million in grants. http://www.100resilientcities.org/10percent-resilience-pledge http://www.100resilientcities.org/100RC-FAQ/#/-_/ Somehow, in Tavares’ mind, the pledge became analogous to the old trope about Agenda 21 and world domination with a dash of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and geoengineering. Just nonsense.