This video of Rosalind Peterson at the UN in 2007 has been repurposed on social media as if it's something new. It's been posted with such headlines as "100% Proof!" and "Leaker Speaks Out At United Nations".
Hello,
I'm new here and would like to give you my opinion. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to me that the debunkers on this site couldn't care less about getting the truth about important matters to the surface. All they seem to care about is debunking little details such as the correctness of the title or claims about information instead of checking for the correctness of the information or matter itself, and then when one or other of such details is incorrect, the matter's been debunked, case closed.
I came to this site to be better informed about matters of importance, but all I find here is angry young men who very quickly do away with (debunk) important matters in a way that is not at all informative.
Maybe you guys may think that what Rosalind Peterson claims is totally irrelevant, and that we better assume that all's well with the air and water quality in California (the state where she lives) or elsewhere in the USA, but maybe, one day we realize that she was right after all but then it will be too late to do anything about it. I really would like to know for sure!
The point that she makes is about the dangers of large scale geoengineering the way it's actually being done. So that's what should be investigated and eventually debunked if she's been wrong about it, and not whether or not the title of a video she didn't even post on Youtube herself was correct or not, and whether she spoke to the UN or was it in reality on the ladies toilets of the Euro Parliament.
Why not dive into the matter a bit more seriously like: OK, Ms Peterson has these claims and such and so proof on her web-site, now let's truly investigate whether she's spreading disinformation or not, whether her web-site misrepresents matters, and if so mention that in detail on this site. If she happens to be right, at points or completely, mention that as well. That's the info I would like to get from a 'debunk' web-site.
Now here's a video of a meeting where Ms Peterson as well as a biologist inform the audience about the effects of geoengineering in California, and it would interest me if the members of this site could give it an honest effort to find out whether this lady is providing valuable information or not.
Sorry for my English, it's not my native language.
Greetings from a wet S-W of France,
Jacques