1. Alhazred The Sane

    Alhazred The Sane Senior Member

    Chomsky and Hermann have thoroughly debunked the myth of 'the Liberal Media' a long time ago. Since then, ownership of media has become even more concentrated in the hands of fewer corporations.

    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8oHl3ooeZo
  2. qed

    qed Active Member

    Fake news is at the centre of the future Pulitzer winning journalism/hacking going down in South Africa.

  3. MikeG

    MikeG Senior Member

    deirdre's comment at the start of the thread stayed with me after all these months. The article, written by Colin Dickey for the New Republic, speaks to the nature of the audience in determining how fake news spreads. [my emphasis]

    New Republic.


    The article also provides a few interesting examples of CT believers who inhabit the political left.

    Left CT.
  4. Birkenhead

    Birkenhead New Member

    just my 2 cents: i feel like this topic is getting too political by times. personally, i do not believe that fake news and ct are typically attributed to certain political opinions. in recent times, topics like the us election, trump's presidency, brexit or the european refugee crisis may have been a fertile soil for a lot of (far right) nonsense which has gone viral. however, many ct themes are (still) universal, not exclusively claimed by (or easy to blame on) one side of the political spectrum. there are many "leftists" who believe 9/11 was an inside job for example. the people who refuse to vaccinate their offspring are – in my old country – more than often wealthy and well educated left-hearted democrats ... you won't believe what kind of fake news these people are posting on twitter/fb every day.

    p.s. i donate a lot of work for a debunking group on facebook, my topics are vaccines ("are evil"), fluorid ("in toothpaste is dangerous") and aluminum ("causes breast cancer") and i couldn't tell that the origins of all the post i have to deal with came from a certain political group.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    I agree with everthing you wrote, but here in America the term "Fake News" burst into existence (through mainstream media) as a political thing.
  6. Birkenhead

    Birkenhead New Member

    i agree. a lot of finger pointing is going on, though. from both sides.

    more back on the topic: i really wonder, if some things the so-called "msm" published, could be considered as "fake news", too. for example, sometimes there are incorrect quotes (often wrong translations) or quotes out of context. the essence of such articles are broadly shared on the internet via social media, first with direct links, later with individual interpretations of the article's supposed message. it's in the nature of virality, that the original message will get distorted and over-exaggerated after a short time. taken this, perhaps the fake news aspect takes place with the spreading of a message, not by the original source. still, the question is, if the "mutation" of the message is calculated and intentionally.

    example from yesterday: the imf has published the economic forecast for 2017/2018. one of the biggest german newspaper came up with the headline "imf prognosis downgraded: us economic growth will be low". if you read the iwf forecast, it says "us economic's growth is above the earlier forecasts. the estimation has been lowered by uncertain data regarding budgets and taxes to 2.1% for both forthcoming years, which is still well above the former growth rate of 1.6%". both the german headline and article didn't mention this. later that day you could read mocking posts on facebook claiming "us economic is totally f#&%ed up!", taking this article as a reference. the original article was quite misleading maybe, but it didn't really contain lies, yet the core message turned into wrong conclusions very quickly.
  7. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    well that's what Donald Trump's whole schtick is. :) But personally, I think Fake News should only be used to refer to out and out made up stories, like "CIA guy admits to blowing up WTC7" or there was one tied to Hillary Clinton where the supposed whistle blower guy never actually existed.

    I think when people start calling everything "fake news" vs. just plain old bunk, satire or 'political spin', then the term becomes meaningless.
    • Agree Agree x 3
  8. SR1419

    SR1419 Senior Member

    Yes! there is a difference between "Fake News"- which is factually incorrect information- and biased or slanted coverage. Alas, "fake news" is now a meme to label and discredit anything someone doesn't agree with.
  9. Toots

    Toots New Member

    Just a minor point - I have never heard of two of the three posted, but the third (Louise Mensch) in no sense inhabits the political left. She is a former MP for the Conservative Party who describes her political views as being close to those of George Osborne.

    For the New Republic to describe her as a left-wing, as they indeed do in the article you linked to, bespokes either a low level of research into their topic, or a rather disturbing world-view in which 'left-wing' simply means 'opposed to Donald Trump'.

    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 27, 2017
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. MikeG

    MikeG Senior Member

    Fair point.

    Regardless of her past politics, the crux of her current conspiracies skew toward the left. The New Republic article notes:

    Her most "famous fan" is Ted Lieu, a California Democrat.

    And he serves on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.


    Source: https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/843143969261289472
  11. Hama Neggs

    Hama Neggs Senior Member

    Traditional definitions of "liberal" have become useless. So has any understanding of the "media" from more than a few years ago. The internet has changed things about how the "media" functions and reacts.
  12. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    Guys, no need to go completely off-topic here. My statement was in response specifically to the OP, which linked only The New York Times (of this decade, not their coverage of Watergate, the Vietnam War or whether their readers didnt like them using the word "torture" with the US as perpetrators as per Chomsky and Hermann) and the Washington Post.

    Although, I think the NYT did call out the WP a couple times for bunk/fake news this year (Propornot etc).

    But then they did post that fake news bit about Palin. (and by fake news, I mean news they knew was fake when they wrote it because they were one of the ones who debunked it in the first place). and the WP called them out :) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...by-giffordss-shooting/?utm_term=.df7f22e05a1e
  13. qed

    qed Active Member

    I think we need to also distinguish "mistaken news, followed up by apology" from "fake news". Journalists make mistakes. While bad on many levels, mistakes are not "fake news", unless done on purpose of course.
    • Agree Agree x 3
  14. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    maybe the inclusion of the word "past" is unfair. I always thought (and still do somewhat) that some of Trump's lackeys seem like the types to 'collude' with the Russians. I've been suspicious of Jared from the start.. I wont go into why.

    So just saying, just because a conservative agrees with the libs on certain issues doesn't make them Libs per say. Personally I see Trump as a Libertarian more than a "conservative", but that may just be my bias trying to distance myself from him.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    • Like Like x 1
  16. Marin B

    Marin B Active Member

    Real interesting conversation on this topic in one of today's segments of "On Point with Tom Ashbrook". His guests were Clint Watts, a Senior Fellow at the Center For Cyber and Homeland Security at The George Washington University, and Sam Woolley, Director of Research of the Computational Propaganda project, at the Oxford Internet Institute at the University of Oxford.

    Summary of segment:

    Here's a link to the podcast.

    Maybe a transcript of the intro will entice you to listen...
    Edited to note that MikeG in post #74, quoted an article that quotes Clint Watts, who was one of the guests on today's podcast.
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2017
    • Informative Informative x 1
  17. qed

    qed Active Member

    This plus AI, there is a new "reality" a coming...
  18. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    and cgi, enhanced photoshop doohickeys.. cant believe anything you read or see anymore :)
  19. Critical Thinker

    Critical Thinker Senior Member

    Link to story in Washington Post "Trump backers’ alarming reliance on hoax and conspiracy theory websites, in 1 chart"

    • Informative Informative x 1
  20. Rory

    Rory Active Member

    Paul Horner is apparently dead:
  21. Gary Cook

    Gary Cook Active Member

    Too much secondary research and not enough primary research.