1. skephu

    skephu Senior Member

    Judging from this response on the Facebook page, we're not going to see this film anytime soon:
     
  2. Efftup

    Efftup Senior Member

    To quote Michael Biehn in "Terminator": WHAT year?
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  3. Peter

    Peter Member

    Well let's hope that by that time it isn't too late to do something about whatever important revelations are in that movie.

    But oh well.. you gotta have priorities right? ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    I recorded the full audio of my interview, about an hour, I'll transcribe and put it up in a day or so.
     
    • Like Like x 6
  5. Justin L. Franks

    Justin L. Franks New Member

    Well, the new trailer certainly seems highly biased towards the chemtrail hypothesis and not nearly as neutral as the original trailer from 2013. I hope that this is just a marketing ploy to garner the chemtrail believers. Matthias Hancke has replied to the question by Peter Laros about the analysis of the sampling data, confirming that the results will be included in the film, which is promising.

    I look forward to the release, but am concerned that it will just be another WITWATS-type fear-mongering film. We'll just have to wait and see.

    Mick, I look forward to hearing your interview.
     
  6. Peter

    Peter Member

    I've posted a follow up question asking whether he found any evidence for chemtrails. Kinda point blank. If he found something important, I can't see why he'd be holding it back, just not to spoil his movie. Wouldn't it be too important for that?

    Mick, can't wait for the audio either.. Please post it soon :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Justin L. Franks

    Justin L. Franks New Member

    Hancke responded to Peter's request, stating that we will have to wait for the movie to be released to see the results. Not very encouraging.
     
  8. Spectrar Ghost

    Spectrar Ghost Senior Member

    Not encouraging at all.

    Oh no! A global conspiracy is poisoning us all and I have proof! But it'll cost $14.99, please.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. occams rusty scissor

    occams rusty scissor Active Member

    Indeed. Does this now make him one of the global elitists who are now only interested in money over the health and safety of the general population??
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. Whitebeard

    Whitebeard Senior Member

    in a word....

    YES
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    Not so much if the results don't actually show anything.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Efftup

    Efftup Senior Member

    ah!! YOU mean "you will have to wait and see and pay $14.99 to see that I in fact have nothing".

    Yes, very common tactic.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    except it seems some of the chemtrail followers ARE sick. They need to stop blaming these mythological chemtrails and find out what is the REAL cause. So, technically by hiding his results he is keeping people sick. (and then of course there are the threats to shoot down planes, which endanger passengers AND people on the ground when the plane crashes. that's not safe)
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. Jay Reynolds

    Jay Reynolds Senior Member

    Many chemtrail believers seem to have little concern over why Michael Murphy & Co. have similarly dragged out their own story. They began in 2010 and though they certainly know, they have yet to actually come out and tell folks "WHO in the world is spraying"......

    I they they certainly know WHO is making the lines they call "chemtrails" because the co-producer of the original WITWATS movie has said so publicly:


    G Edward Griffin.
     
  15. Hama Neggs

    Hama Neggs Senior Member

    Please add a link to where he made that statement.
     
  16. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Ross Marsden

    Ross Marsden Senior Member

    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  18. Hama Neggs

    Hama Neggs Senior Member

    Wow, so Wigington is the spreader of this "20% reduction in sunlight" claim. Didn't know that. When I asked someone where they got that, the other day, they provided links which said nothing of the kind. Maybe those same links are the ones Dane used to come to that false conclusion too?
     
  19. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. Ross Marsden

    Ross Marsden Senior Member

    I have the recollection that the 20% figure comes from one observation made in Hong Kong or some place back on the "global dimming" days some decades ago.
     
  21. Hama Neggs

    Hama Neggs Senior Member

    Yes, or wasn't there some study in Israel involving cloud cover? It was related to a local phenomenon.
     
  22. skephu

    skephu Senior Member

    Yes, it was from Israel: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4171591.stm
     
  23. keefe

    keefe Active Member

    That reminds me of this fellow that i found a couple of years ago - to give him credit he has done some homework and identified the planes doing the spraying, which he says are "100% commercial jets from virtually all airlines" .. so much for tankers then ...
     
  24. keefe

    keefe Active Member

    he also has a theory as to how the spraying is being done
     
  25. Rico

    Rico Active Member

    I used to work the ramp for various airlines, and I used to drive the lavatory truck as well. It's not the daily duty that I had to do, but us ramp monkeys rotate between jobs, and on certain days, the poop truck might very well be our job of the day.

    There was no secret operation, no computer system, and no other complexities involved. When we were lav-teching, we know pretty much exactly what is going on. We attach a large transparent hose to the aircraft, and we can literally see brown and blue juices as we carefully pull the dump valves and hope to dear god that it doesn't end up on our clothes and face. What we add to the airplane is simple deodorized water, composed of regular water and blue dyed deodorizer in a pack that is smaller than my palm.

    How we prep the truck for servicing between flights is driving the truck to a dump station, that literally smells like crap. We dump the hazardous human waste through drains below the truck. At the same time, we recharge the truck with blue fluid by adding a pack of deodorizer to a fill port, and then fill the rest with water.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  26. JRBids

    JRBids Senior Member

    The problem with his "theory" of where the fluid comes from is that it would have to go into every plane leaving that particular airport. (I can't believe I am even typing that.)
     
  27. Hama Neggs

    Hama Neggs Senior Member

    But the claim that it's all coming from "unmarked", "unidentified" or "military" planes is still rampant.
     
  28. keefe

    keefe Active Member

    its a pity his video hasn't got more views among the chemtrail community - if it was at least that would clear up that little bit of misinformation for them
     
  29. keefe

    keefe Active Member

    and every airport would need this complex computer controlled valve system in the sewage tanks .. i don't think so
     
  30. Balance

    Balance Senior Member