Tags:
  1. mvdb22

    mvdb22 Member

    Russian TV just released a satellite photo which shows an Ukraine Air Force Mig-29 just as it launches a rocket to a plane supposed to be the Boeing 777 of Malaysia (MH17)

    The article is here
    http://www.1tv.ru/news/leontiev/271824
    [​IMG]
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    Can you post translated sections of the article that describe where they got it?
     
  3. Trailspotter

    Trailspotter Senior Member

    The article is a transcript of the video. It says that the photos were attached to the following email, signed by a George Bilt:
    Screen shot 2014-11-14 at 17.10.31.

    The presenter suggested that these photos possibly were taken by an American or British spy satellite.
     
  4. Mackdog

    Mackdog Active Member

    If they pumped cannon rounds into the cockpit and the cockpit fell off the plane, then why would they need to blow up the engine to cause it to crash?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. TEEJ

    TEEJ Senior Member

    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. TEEJ

    TEEJ Senior Member

    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  7. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    It would be easy to take an image from Google Maps.
    image.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Mi3

    Mi3 New Member

    On image is Su-27 and not MIG-29 how its said in article.

    Su-27
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Mi3

    Mi3 New Member

    • Like Like x 1
  10. Mi3

    Mi3 New Member

    High res picture.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Useful Useful x 2
  11. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    I'm not sure that can be confidently stated. I think the angle of the tail section more resembles a MIG than the SU
    upload_2014-11-15_7-37-0.
    upload_2014-11-15_7-36-18.
    But this is the first time that a MIG and not an SU has been mentioned in connection to the incident.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Mi3

    Mi3 New Member

    Look at front, Su-27 is more narrow shaped.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. SergeyL

    SergeyL New Member

    Hello. I am from Russia and here it is what I found.

    Pucture from right is a satellite photo from Russian News. Picture from left is a Google Earth photo for 28.08.2012. The same cloud after some years? NOWAY~

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like x 7
    • Winner x 5
    • Useful x 2
    • Agree x 1
    • Informative x 1
  14. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    True.
     
  15. mvdb22

    mvdb22 Member

    • Like Like x 2
    • Useful Useful x 1
  16. SergeyL

    SergeyL New Member

    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Mi3

    Mi3 New Member

    Nice find!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. Efftup

    Efftup Senior Member

    looks like none of it looks right. it's a google Earth pic and that's definitely a su27
     
  19. TEEJ

    TEEJ Senior Member

    That is an option, Mick. On the Boeing 767 image someone has produced the following.

    [​IMG]

    http://imgur.com/JdIZMDO
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    Not all those points seem solid (no contrails behind the plane doesn't prove it's not in flight for one) but the map photo showing fields with no change from 2012 (or 2002, it's not clear) is the simplest and most obvious debunk.
    I couldn't find the exact same image on google earth, the one closest resembling the pattern in one of the fields was a black and white photo from 2011. I think the yandex map may be an original image then not used by google, not sure how to check their image dates though.
     
  21. Tester

    Tester New Member

    Found this on Youtube channel HERE.. right before the post with this image was pulled down .. weird

    [​IMG]
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  22. SergeyL

    SergeyL New Member

    Some pictures from me.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Useful Useful x 2
  23. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    The airport image (thin horizontal rectangle) is definitely post-2012 as the runways weren't finished before then
    But what's weird on google earth is what looks like a wrecked plane in the parking area, between the images 4/28 and 6/19.
    Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at 10.56.48 am.
    . Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at 10.57.04 am.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2014
  24. Mackdog

    Mackdog Active Member

    Anyone else think the "missile trail" is a photoshopped airplane contrail..err..I mean chemtrail :eek:
     
  25. WeedWhacker

    WeedWhacker Senior Member

    From post #3: Photo of English-language transcript. (Paragraph three):

    "...aiming right and sharp at the pilots' abdomen region." Nonsense. Their heads are the most obvious targets, through the windows.

    On further reflection, one might wish to 'argue' that the "abdomen region" of the two pilots was guessed at...this type of accuracy is also not believable. In addition, in any case "IF" it is as claimed in that transcript? I.E., "(To silence killing them instantly - not even a scream)". Just wrong. People hit in that manner may well cry out in pain, and thus the CVR would have recorded it. Only way to NOT hear a pilot make a sound is when the main electrical power for the whole airplane is shut off, thus stopping the CVR recording capability.

    So agree, this is a hoax.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2014
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  26. SergeyL

    SergeyL New Member

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
  27. Efftup

    Efftup Senior Member

    is that Putin? lol
     
  28. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    Another feature debunked ('cause this is kind of fun)...
    Detail from claimed 'sat image' from July 17th.
    Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at 11.49.12 am.
    This feature on July 16th.
    Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at 11.49.49 am.
    The last time it looked like the claimed image. Screen Shot 2014-11-15 at 11.48.49 am.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Nov 14, 2014
    • Like Like x 2
    • Useful Useful x 1
  29. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    :p
    At least no-one official is endorsing this.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  30. Mackdog

    Mackdog Active Member

    What is that a couple of bridges that were built after 2010?
     
  31. TEEJ

    TEEJ Senior Member

    • Like Like x 2
  32. Trailspotter

    Trailspotter Senior Member

    • Like Like x 1
  33. Trailblazer

    Trailblazer Moderator Staff Member

    Presumably damage from the battle at the end of May?

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_Donetsk_Airport

    That airport (which was only rebuilt a couple of years ago) has since been more or less completely destroyed by fighting.

    [​IMG]

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...says-331-killed-month-s-ceasefire-agreed.html
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2014
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  34. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    Well, maybe not so weird when you take it being an active warzone into account then. :)

     
  35. Trailblazer

    Trailblazer Moderator Staff Member

    Looks more like dams in a holding pond or reservoir?
     
  36. Severed

    Severed New Member

    Seems to be debunked. A couple of thoughts, the US spends almost a 100 billion dollars on intelligence, isn't it logical that unless they're only spying on the western world, that they would have genuine images of the shootdown? Also how reliable is Google Earth? This image has been out there for a while and the head of Google is very close to the US government, I've heard. Could the images simply be altered at google?
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  37. Pete Tar

    Pete Tar Moderator Staff Member

    It's not exactly logical that $100 billion on intelligence = they must have footage of the moment of attack.

    You'll have to flesh out your thinking a bit more on your second point. Reliable in what way? Why would google alter the images in google earth to include parts of the fake picture, and what does 'being close' to the US government mean exactly and why does it have any bearing on this fake?
    The one conspiracy theory in regard to this that might have some merit is that it was an obvious fake put out to discredit the report it supposedly was in support of, but I don't really think it requires any effort like this to do that.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  38. Trailblazer

    Trailblazer Moderator Staff Member

    First claim: what are the chances that a spy satellite would just happen to be in exactly the right position at exactly the right moment to take a photo of such an event? Pretty astronomically tiny! However large the US government spying budget is, they don't have a live view of the planet that they can just zoom in on any spot at any time. Spy satellites don't work like that.

    As for the claim of altered images at Google. Well there is no evidence that it has been altered. And Google doesn't generate its own satellite imagery, of course. All the satellite images on Google Earth are from commercial image providers, and can be checked with the providers, so if anyone is doing the altering, it wouldn't be Google.

    And there are plenty of other reasons it is fake. For one, the size of the plane is ridiculously huge. If you measure the plane on the image, then plug in the altitude of the satellite that took the image and the altitude of the plane, the airliner would have to be about two and a half miles long!
     
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2014
    • Agree Agree x 7
  39. Severed

    Severed New Member

    By seems to be debunked, was agreeing it was probably fake. I wasn't claiming that google had faked pictures, I was asking whether that possibility shouldn't be considered. After all, Google Earth was a program named Keyhole until the CIA sold it to them and they are partnered with the CIA in Recorded Future.Their head agrees with the government that there should noI didn't come here to argue. privacy for anyone. I don't agree that it is improbable that we were keeping close watch on Ukraine.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  40. WeedWhacker

    WeedWhacker Senior Member

    Please provide evidence of this claim. It is very interesting (if true).