Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    • Like Like x 1
  2. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    He's the top-drawer English media whore. Not the only one, of course, but one of the latest of a long line.

    Potholer's a middle class hero...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    • Like Like x 2
  4. Joe

    Joe Senior Member

  5. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

  6. Joe

    Joe Senior Member

     
  7. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    Metabunk Mick Site, but you and Oxy post here rather a lot.... Does that mean you are my minions?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Joe

    Joe Senior Member

  9. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    Then more typing, and less YouTube! :)
     
  10. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    Not that bad an idea. He irritated me, can't remember what about exactly. It would be good to clear away some misconceptions.
     
  11. Joe

    Joe Senior Member

    The fact that he said the core of the earth was several million degrees ?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMrxC-qEHb8
     
  12. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    I don't think the fact that he mistakenly said "million" instead of "thousand" on a late night talk show is an indication of anything.

    Find something that he repeatedly claims to be, that is actually false.
     
  13. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    He could have confused that with the temperature at the center of the Sun.

    It is generally understood that the temperature at the center of the Earth is similar to that of the surface of the Sun.
     
  14. Joe

    Joe Senior Member

    Al Gore has done more to hurt the global warming movement then helped . As in the top video response to Oxy with him it was all about making tons of money at the expense of the poor and middle class Americans Carbon tax . I dont how a carbon tax will do any thing other then lining someone else s pocket on more green energy scams as in Spain which should be a perfect example of how to destroy your economy . He is a politician and most of his wealth is from oil . he sells his network to a oil nation . Al Gore is a hypocrite and a Liar .
     
  15. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    A liar may speak the truth.

    Lord Christopher here varies his lies to equivocation and back again. Altogether another kettle of fish.
     
  16. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    http://illuminutti.com/about/ :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    Alex Jones appeared. He didn't go away after one second, so I made him.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  18. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    • Like Like x 1
  19. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    Seems they cannot carry the hoax on much longer, emperors new clothes.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...g-forecasts-costing-billions-WRONG-along.html



    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 20, 2013
  20. scombrid

    scombrid Senior Member

    The figure you copy/paste says:

    That's a bold unsubstantiated claim.
     
  21. scombrid

    scombrid Senior Member

    Furthermore, reading the article gives a strong impression that Rose is cherry picking and quote mining.

    People that have already analyzed his opinion piece in the telegraph have found just that.

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/david-rose-hides-rise-global-warming.html

    The article does its position no favors by repeating debunked myths

     
  22. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    It really pains me to say it, but that was some Gish Gallop you just posted.

    Can you please explain, in simple terms why the world getting warmer or even colder is attributable to mankind and if so how did we manage to create and defrost a couple of ice ages. If our ancestors were advanced enough back in the day to do that, why should we worry... we are even cleverer are we not?
     
  23. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    The Gish had galloped before the stable door had been closed.

    CO2 added to earth's atmosphere makes it warmer. It's a logarithmic function, in that each increment has slightly less warming effect, but the fact is that we're DOUBLING the CO2 added to our atmosphere every 32 years, simply due to the fact we are doubling our demand for energy at the same rate. The increase has been logged continuously since the mid-fifties. There hasn't been an equivalent increase in the Sun's energy, in fact clean air acts have actually allowed a greater insolation in the last decade, while there has been no apparent heating. But while there has been no apparent heating, icecap ice everywhere has accelerated its melting. If you haven't blinkered yourself you can see the earth is heating up.

    Ice ages occur, in the absence of other influences, when the earth's leisurely Malenkovich orbital cycles reduce solar insolation to its minimum. But there are other influences, both continental drift and vulcanism having been profoundly powerful in the past, breaking the cycles.

    Forty years ago there were 35 papers predicting global warming and six predicting an ice age. They were all correct. The global warming is happening right now, and the next Ice Age would have been going to arrive 17,800 years from now had we not lit the coal fires.

    Carbon isotope studies confirm a rising proportion of burnt fossil fuel carbon dioxide in earth's atmosphere.

    Our ancestors had NO control over the earth's weather. We do. We aren't cleverer (what made you believe that? Do you think we're evolving more intelligence?), but some of us are clever enough to know what has to be done. We must

    STOP BURNING FOSSIL CARBON.

    Are we clever enough to do that, d'you think?
     
    • Like Like x 2
  24. Alhazred The Sane

    Alhazred The Sane Senior Member

    I love Potholer's videos, I started subscribing to him a couple of years ago when he first invented the magnificent Golden Crocoduck award. It's the likes of him that make youtube worth visiting.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  25. Alhazred The Sane

    Alhazred The Sane Senior Member

    "The global warmists used to say humans were causing global warming. But they have re-engineered their wording. Now they say humans “contribute” to “climate change.”"

    If I'm not mistaken, the fact that we've only recently begun to use the phrase 'global warming' until recently has been well and truly debunked, by Mick (I think), who linked to its use in the 1970s.

    However, it's not a surprise that so many people are still in climate change denial (even though scientific consensus is around 97%!!!) when so much money has been pumped into it by the likes of Koch and Big Oil.

    http://www.livescience.com/26618-climate-change-denial-koch-donors-trust.html
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/14/funding-climate-change-denial-thinktanks-network
    http://www.countercurrents.org/cc160213.htm
    http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/11/28/meet-the-climate-denial-machine/191545

    Actually, Oxymoron, I'm surprised you're not bothered by all the secretive funding of climate denial by major industrial contributors to the problem. This IS a conspiracy!
     
  26. scombrid

    scombrid Senior Member

    Addressing the myriad of mistakes in a Gish Gallop such as in the article that you linked constitutes a Gish Gallop?



    There are numerous things that drive climate. The one of many that is changing now is the composition of the atmosphere. The others such as orbital variations, solar intensity, etc..., the factors that drove climate before the industrial age, are not changing in such a way as to cause the current observed trend.

    This claim that climate changing in the past without human influence means that humans can't be changing the climate now is an old canard. Fortunately somebody has already written an answer that I find sufficient.

    http://skepticalscience.com/climate-change-little-ice-age-medieval-warm-period.htm

     
  27. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    Secretive funding from any source for anything concerns me as it is open to abuse and agenda. I say 'lets have transparency', but then that's just how I am.

    Obviously the cleaner the energy and the cheaper the energy, the better. I like geothermal energy and most people do not 'want' pollution. I also like the idea of tidal energy.

    https://www.gov.uk/wave-and-tidal-energy-part-of-the-uks-energy-mix

    Alternative energy seems to have been largely suppressed.

    I can never understand why people are so surprised when their house, built on a flood plain, gets flooded or when a nuclear reactor built on a geological fault line gets hit by a tsunami and earthquake.
     
  28. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    These 'forcings' play a far larger role than anything man has done IMO. Look at the North Sea oil... Heavily forested only around 80,000 years ago if I'm not mistaken. Continental drift, Huge volcanic eruptions dwarfing anything we have put out. That and the Solar activity levels.

    Animals have been farting for millenia and vegetation has been rotting and giving off methane also.

    Don't get me wrong, I am not advocating pollution, far from it, I simply think man has not made any significant difference to 'climate change'.
     
  29. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    Largely suppressed? Like what, for example? There seems to be quite a lot of solar and wind power projects. It's mostly economics.
     
  30. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    Most scientists disagree with you. Especially those who study that type of thing:
    http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2012climatechange.html
    And every other major body of scientists agrees.
     
  31. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    It cannot be economics because solar and wind are incredibly expensive. Hugely expensive but little impact on oil interests :)

    I think water as a fuel has been suppressed. Hydrogen, Oxygen... I think we have the technology and have had for a long time.
     
  32. SR1419

    SR1419 Senior Member

    Thats the point...if solar/wind/geothermal etc.. were less expensive it would be even more common.

    I am sure oil companies would be happy to make money with other methods of energy production if it were economically feasible and profitable.
     
  33. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    Yes that is one side of the debate but how do we know the 'climate change' would not be happening anyway.

    Again the North Sea... huge land mass... lost... where were all the climatologists then screaming "kill the animals to stop them farting and put that fire out, don't you see the waters taking over the land"

    All the carbon now locked up in the oil etc was freely abundant then and life went on.
     
  34. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    I am not so sure. They are heavily invested and entrenched. Do they really want to give up that power and income stream voluntarily.

    The Emirates are diversifying because they know it will eventually run out but whilst the cow gives milk, they will milk it. Human nature unfortunately.
     
  35. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    That's pure wishful thinking I'm afraid. Water is the product of combustion. You can't un-burn something. It's a simple equation:

    H2 + O = H2O + heat energy

    To split the H2O into H and O, you need to put back in the energy you took out.
     
  36. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    Oxy, your heart's in the right place but your head must have been out to lunch during science classes.

    Hydrogen burns in oxygen. Energy is liberated by that combustion, and it's wonderful. The best rocketry uses it to LIFT, and so does the human body (in little steps) to POWER its internal processes and muscular actions.

    But once used, it cannot be used again, except by using slightly more energy* to separate the oxygen and hydrogen, for re-use. There is no free lunch. Don't even dream of it.

    * There's no such thing as 100% efficiency, this side of the quantum barrier, either, Mick. :rolleyes:
     
  37. MikeC

    MikeC Closed Account

    Fossil fuel subsidies have increased massivly in the last few years - over $500 billion worldwide in 2011 for fossil fuels - an increase of 20% from 2010!

    vs a "mere" $88 billion for "renewables"

    Most of the fossil fuel subsidy is low prices for consumers in states that produce the oil - meaning the rest of us are paying so they get cheap oil and gas - it's not actually the oil companies doing it!
     
  38. Jazzy

    Jazzy Closed Account

    It is almost as if you have your fingers in your ears.

    So it did, but Life was lived almost exclusively in the sea, which was three hundred and fifty feet higher than it presently is. For ammonites, life was GREAT.

    It may have been possible to "live" at the poles, but at the time there was no land there anyway, and no land animals to live it. The exposed land was Saharan in nature.

    It is a very bad idea* to return all of that fossil carbon to the atmosphere. The "other side" of this "debate" is a grinning skull.

    * Truly Faustian. We can out-do another famous myth if we wish, collectively. Could be a boost for space travel. Look on the bright side... ...there's a whole universe to ruin.
     
  39. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Banned Banned

    Yes that is the accepted version. I am merely opining, I think it is likely possible but not public.

    When you start looking at string theory and how at the minutest level every last thing in the Universe is made up of the same building blocks or 'strings', where 'simply' how it is vibrating at different frequencies defines it's characteristics, the possibilities become endless.
     
  40. Cairenn

    Cairenn Senior Member

    I live in Texas home of BIG oil, and yet, we have Green Mountain Energy





    http://www.greenmountain.com/
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.