I don't have a law background but I was wondering if any Metabunk member with a legal bent could enlighten us on what would constitute evidence for chemtrails that would stand up in a court of law? This would also help our legion of friends who call us shills but nevertheless find time to read the forum looking for references to themselves. My thoughts.... Verifiable documentary evidence. Verifiable witness statements. Air samples that take into account all possible sources of contamination. Direct sampling of a trail that reveals suspicious contaminants. Any science that explains how trails thicken without adding ice from the atmosphere. I have counted three or four attempts to get "chemtrails" into the courts. None of them had any of the above. What else would it take?