# Can You Validate Earth's Curvature with a Drone?

Discussion in 'Flat Earth' started by Kriss3d, Dec 11, 2018.

1. ### Kriss3dNew Member

First of all. I know earth is a sphere. I got the idea that since we with a theodolite can see earth curve directly, I think a simple experiment could be used to more specifically prove the famous drop.

A theodolite set up exactly level,
A drone flies out over the ocean keeping in the center of the crosshair at all times. Or at least when taking readings.

A method for a drone to measure the exact distance from itself down to the water below. My initial idea would be a laser range finder. But I'm not sure if that would work on water
Or would an ultra sonic work better?

Is there any known way to accurately determine distance to something bouncing it off water Or will a simple altimeter using air pressure be accurate enough ?

2. ### cloudspotterSenior Member

The first problem that springs to my mind is the range of a drone. From a quick Google is seems that 5 miles is about the limit and that's with a drone that costs over a thousand pounds

3. ### DavidB66Member

On the question of range, I don't think it would be strictly necessary for the drone to fly all the way from the observation point to the target distance or distances. It could be carried out on a boat and then launched to rise until it reaches the crosshairs. (Radio communication between the boat and the observer would presumably be necessary.) I don't know if this would meet the purpose of the experiment, because I'm not sure what the purpose is! There are already several videos by Jesse Kozlowski showing the size of the 'drop' through a theodolite aimed at some distant lighthouse, etc. This has no impact on flat earth believers, because (a) they don't understand the geometry, and (b) they don't trust theodolites.

• Agree x 1
4. ### cloudspotterSenior Member

Good point, that would get over the range issue

On to the point of measuring height; I'm thinking a simple plum line hanging from the drone with a highly visible weight on the end would at least indicate if the water surface was dropping away from the crosshair height

It's an interesting idea, and it might even work over a relatively short distance like 5 miles if it was done accurately.

The most important consideration would be to rise above the near-water refraction. You would want the drone as high as possible while still being above to measure its own height. Also do it when the air temperature is a close to the water temperature as it is likely to get.

You'd want it flown by computer if possible. Probably the simplest way of doing the experiment would be to program it to fly a point to point course towards the camera while maintaining a fixed altitude above the water (the same altitude as the camera).

A calm lake would work best.

For measuring altiutude, a lot of drones have ultrasonic sensors just for that reason. If you were being especially ambitious your could roll your own. This one is accurate to 10m in a resolution of 1mm
https://www.maxbotix.com/Ultrasonic...ed=1&max_range=10m&resolution=1mm&outputs=ttl

The key deliverable would be a video synchronized with data from the drone: 3D GPS coordinates, barometer altitude, and ultrasonic altitude. The altitude would remain stable, and you would see the drone rise up.

Keeping the drone centered in the camera would also be compelling.

It would be hard to fly with a plumb line, dragging behind, and hitting the waves. However this would work well if you just wanted to make a series of spot observations. The boat could start 5 miles out, and stop over 0.5 miles, and send up the drone to hover at plumb-line height.

6. ### cloudspotterSenior Member

Yeah, I was thinking spot checking rather than dragging

• Like x 1
7. ### RorySenior Member

Seems like a good experiment to propose to flat earthers, for them to carry out themselves.

Though if they don't trust theodolites...

8. ### BunkmeisterNew Member

I like the idea, but it might be easier to get up a hill or a tower that has a view of a fixed land object of identical height several miles away. There is less wiggle room then to debate or question any altitudes.

A single fixed observation is open to "alternative" interpretation. The benefit of the drone suggestion is that it provides a series of data points which, when plotted on a graph, will form a curve.

10. ### jarlrmaiMember

Drones also have altimeters and self regulate to the same altitude.

What is wanted specifically here is a physical measure of the distance to the surface of the water (preferably a lake). So of the four methods listed above, only the Radio and Laser Altimeter would work. It might be a bit fiddly over water, with reflections.

There's also ultrasonic, which only works for a limited range (like 10m, 30 feet), so is not really considered an altimeter, more of a landing aid. But might be the best bet here.

Of course, the ideal thing is to have ALL the data, GPS, etc, and plot them all together.

13. ### jarlrmaiMember

Okay I get it so the drone corrects altitude to the fixed point but the ground drops away with the curvature of the earth and this is measured with the altimeter.

14. ### TrailblazerModeratorStaff Member

I think it would be difficult to keep the drone centred in the theodolite. It would be easy to have it maintain a fixed altitude above the sea, but that would of course result in it dropping below the crosshairs as it went away. You'd need some pretty skillful flying.