I hope you understand the potential harm in telling others that these devices work. If there is no data you can point us to as to how or whether or not these devices work then it is unethical to recommend it to sick patients. Sometimes people who are in despair will opt for things like this and forego conventional treatment that could actually save their lives, replacing it with unproven methods. It goes against the hard work that so many researchers have put into developing and understanding medicine. If you find answers to any of the questions we asked you here, please come back and post.
A historical review, for academic purposes
These experiments were never successfully replicated, as far as I can tell. They even helped spark the idea of Orgone energy, which has never been shown to exist and is practically the same thing being suggested by proponents of bioresonance.In 1923 Aleksandr Gurwitsch reported that if the growing tips of two onions were placed close together they had a mutually positive effect on growth. If they were separated by glass, this effect did not occur, but if separated by quartz, which permits the passage of ultraviolet radiation, the effect returned.
I bolded the 30,000 because that is impossible. What you can see in a light microscope is limited by the diffraction properties of light. About 1,500X is the limit for light microscopes. You can magnify higher, but you need other techniques in order to improve the resolution and actually see anything, techniques that didn't exist in Rife's time. 30,000X is also unnecessary as you can see microbes with standard 1,000X or 600X objectives.Arguably the next most important development in the US was the claim by Royle Rife that his specially constructed high magnification (x 30,000) light microscopes could show how microbes are destroyed by specific frequencies (Rife called this the mortal oscillatory rate), and that this was the way to cure infectious diseases as well as cancer.
Actually it has been practically nonexistent. All of the papers referenced on these pages are either not peer-reviewed, do not support the idea of bioresonance, or are simply unimpressive studies such as one that contained a sample size of 20.In conclusion, it would appear that even though the supporting peer-reviewed, evidence-based science for bioresonance is slow in coming
I'm afraid that people are in despair because 'conventional treatment' can do nothing for them.
Where are these frequencies listed? Not in your manual, right? Not elsewhere on the internet, right? Say I have an infection of pathogenic E.coli, what frequency would I need to treat myself with? If they are empirically discovered, surely someone has a value for me?Today ideas of bioresonance have been translated into a wide variety of instruments claimed to identify and correct those resonances deficient in the patient’s body via applying specific empirically-discovered frequencies.
Wait... Not only do these devices cure all diseases and cancers, now it can stop addiction too? It also can cure allergies, and remove scar tissue? And of all the things it can do, the most spectacular is smoking addiction? Not curing a 3 year olds inoperable leukaemia? Not removing heavily metastasised cancer from an 99 year old man? Not removing someone addiction to crystal meth? Are they not spectacular enough?What kind of disorders are claimed to be treatable by bioresonance? Arguably the most spectacular is smoking addiction.
Non-organic gastro intestinal complaints... A term I was stumped by. How can a gastric complaint be non-organic? Does that mean its caused by an obstruction, a foreign object being swallowed? If it was caused by a gut flora imbalance (thats something that the bio-resonance devices claim it should be able to fix) then it would be organic. Some other things that classify as non-organic gastro complaints include nervousness, depression and stress. Unsurprisingly, googling "nonorganic gastro complaints" only brings up references to the Neinhaus et al article and bioresonance. So what condition has the study actually 'studied'?...bioresonance therapy can markedly improve non-organic gastro-intestinal complaints.
A very close family friend was diagnosed with cancer four years ago. She had heard some misinformation from some sort of site--I forget which one, it was NaturalNews or one of its brethren--about the dangers of chemotherapy and the wonders of Rick Simpson Oil, an extremely strong extract of marijuana that was purported to cure everything from asthma to ulcers, but especially lauded for its ability to "cure" cancer. At this phase, her breast cancer was almost certainly curable with surgery and traditional treatment. Instead, she took to the Rick Simpson oil (which has been thoroughly debunked by minds much more capable than mine) and began self-dosing every day.I'm afraid that people are in despair because 'conventional treatment' can do nothing for them.
and thisThey have developed their technology in Russia and now they manufacture their devices in Germany. They have a series of certificates, awards and clinical studies conducted. They are the first to introduce portable devices that one can carry on, and this way the therapy is continuous and thus more effective. As regards bioresonance itself, the validity of this holistic therapy method is now beyond doubt, since it has been proven empirically by many researchers around the world. You can see more here: www.detaelis-international.com
seem to go a touch beyond personal experience. These are presented as factual claims, something that Metabunk focuses entirely on, and from what I can gather there doesn't seem to be much evidence behind them beyond the manufacturer itself. These are HUGE claims too, claims that could revolutionize medicine if they are true! If false, however, they cause harm. Similar claims took the life of my friend. They harm countless others. I suffer from severe anxiety and I've been roped in to the pseudoscience before, wasting money on the newest crystal/homeopathic/transcendental 'cure' in an attempt at any relief. I know and love an addict who has tried similar devices in an attempt to quell his addiction but was crushed to find that the magical 'cure' didn't work. Desperate people are vulnerable people.These energy waves are vibrating at a certain frequency. A stone is vibrating, a tree, a quartz crystal is vibrating, the human cells vibrate, the parasites vibrate, we live in a universe of vibration. This is not any pseudo-science, it is a scientific fact proven in laboratories.
Bioresonance explained: http://www.detaelis-international.com/index.php/answers/what-is-bioresonance
Every cell and thus every organ in our body emits its own distinctive frequency when healthy. If the frequency deviates upwards there is inflammation of the organ, if downwards there is deterioration of the functions of the organ.
What bioresonance researchers did, was to identify the frequency emitted by every parasite that can reside in the human body (we are talking about 0,01 Hz accuracy). They found that when you direct the same frequency on the parasite (virus or any other) itself, its cellular membrane brakes, by resonance. You can find many videos in youtube on braking glass with resonant frequency, to understand how this works.
(. . .)
Moreover they identified the healthy frequencies of our organs and can diagnose when an organ is dysfunctioning.
The actual frequencies are what is most important and not the device itself. Building a device that emits low frequencies is easy. Finding the correct frequencies took years of research.
(. . .)
As you can see, the fact that the devices can emit the claimed frequencies is guaranteed by the German factory. You can trust it or not.
I should clearly state in this thread that I am NOT TRYING TO PROVE ANYTHING TO ANYONE. I am as sceptical as anybody else, and I have shared my personal experience. That's about all.
A very close family friend was diagnosed with cancer four years ago. She had heard some misinformation from some sort of site--I forget which one, it was NaturalNews or one of its brethren--about the dangers of chemotherapy and the wonders of Rick Simpson Oil, an extremely strong extract of marijuana that was purported to cure everything from asthma to ulcers, but especially lauded for its ability to "cure" cancer. At this phase, her breast cancer was almost certainly curable with surgery and traditional treatment. Instead, she took to the Rick Simpson oil (which has been thoroughly debunked by minds much more capable than mine) and began self-dosing every day.
As was expected by her loved ones that were begging her to get it treated with Western medicine, it didn't work. She then took up crystal therapy, sound therapy, light therapy, Reiki, everything. We continued to beg her and she continued to refuse.
By the time she realized that these treatments were doing nothing but costing her vast amounts of money, the cancer had metastasized. She died a few months later, knowing full well that had she listened to those of us that loved her she would likely have been alive. I still get chills thinking about how difficult those last months must have been for her. The regret, death looming, thinking about where she could and should have been. I can't imagine. I really can't.
She was roped in to these beliefs by people peddling pseudoscience like you.
No, her situation doesn't match your fear exactly. I think it's worse. Conventional treatment could have saved her easily, but the romantic promises of health through alternate means snared her.
You say you're afraid of people feeling hopeless and in despair? We're afraid of more innocent people like her dying due to lack of treatment.
Think about the despair she felt lying in her bed as the cancer spread. Think about all the opportunities she had missed, the places she never got to see, and tell me about despair.
May I suggest, and I mean it with all politeness that your posts betray any skepticism in you?I should clearly state in this thread that I am NOT TRYING TO PROVE ANYTHING TO ANYONE. I am as sceptical as anybody else, and I have shared my personal experience. That's about all.
For me, I believe my own research and the empirical results on my own body. At least, I spent the money to try for myself and reach conclusions.
Zapper Digital Frequency Generator
A CURE FOR ALL DISEASES?
YES IT IS TRUE! Many diseases which are been claimed to be incurable are now are being healed through an amazing electro-therapy called a “DR HULDA CLARK DIGITAL ZAPPER”.
HOW DOES ZAPPER DIGITAL WORK?
The Zapper is an electronic device producing an adjustable frequency of 000.01Khz - 999.99Khz @ 5.0 volts DC which is the most successful bandwidth for eliminating bacteria and parasites through the wrist / foot strap terminals. The pulsing action of the positive terminal sends an electronic “wave” through the body, which eliminates all parasites, bacteria, amoeba and viruses that live within this 1,000,000hz band. This positive current detaches the negatively charged bacteria from their electro-magnetic adhesion in the body, so that the immune system can fight them. The frequencies can be programmed in according to the particular illness you are working with.
WHO INVENTED THE ZAPPER?
Dr Robert Beck was the original designer of the Zapper, which he called a “BLOOD CLEANSING DEVICE”. However through Dr Hulda Clark's remarkable achievements in curing thousands of people of cancer using Zapper Technology with natural therapies, she became famous for the Dr Hulda Clark ZAPPER.
WHY ARE MULTIPLE ZAPPING SESSIONS NECESSARY?
Parasites and Amoeba often are carriers of viruses, pathogens and bacteria. When a single zapping session destroys a parasite, parasitic bacteria can be released into the blood stream which can cause an immune system overload. Multiple Zapping sessions eliminate this possibility.