Banff Chemtrails Billboard Worries David Keith

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
20160825-082507-5eev2.jpg

Billboards promoting the "chemtrail" conspiracy theory are nothing new, but this one got the attention of CBC News, Calgary, in part because it was near the home of geoengineering researcher David Keith

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/chemtrails-david-keith-geoengineering-lookupbanff-1.3733776

The billboard promotes a conspiracy theory about governments secretly spraying chemicals from the sky to sterilize people. While it sounds outlandish, Keith has received aggressive threats from some who believe the theory because his research revolves around finding ways to alter the atmosphere to limit the effects of climate change.

"I get emails once every few days," he said. "I get occasional mails that are really wild hate mail. I've had packages that I'm a little worried to open."

He also receives disturbing phone calls, and twice the threats were serious enough that the police were called.

"I suppose if you really believe it, then it's rational to want to kill me because if you really believe it, then you believe I'm some mass murderer orchestrating the death of the human race," he said in an interview with CBC News.

Keith lives part time in nearby Canmore, Alta., and says it feels like the billboard is in his backyard.
...
Billboards similar to to the one in Alberta have appeared in Oregon and Nevada. The Banff businessman believed to have put up the billboard and created the associated website did not respond to requests for comment from CBC News.

Receiving so many threats from chemtrail believers has made Keith cautious.

"There are some very angry people out there. I don't wake up worrying about it, but I do think there is some risk of actual violence."
Content from External Source
The billboard was put up by Jason and Lorna Hardy back in April.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-watch-global-alert-news-april-9-2016/

Our most sincere gratitude to Jason and Lorna Hardy for helping to sound the alarm on the critical climate engineering issue by putting up this new powerful billboard message en route to Banff, Alberta, Canada’s #1 visited park and town (the billboard is on The Trans Canada Highway also known as Hwy 1 heading west just before the start of Banff National Park). The link on the billboard leads to the GeoengineeringWatch.org site.



Billboard LookUpBanff.com and photo credit: Jason and Lorna Hardy
Content from External Source
And the link does indeed just redirect to the geoengineeringwatch.org home page.
 
Does anyone else find it slightly ironic that this billboard was funded by the man who runs the Banff airport bus company? :confused:


upload_2016-8-25_17-27-18.png
upload_2016-8-25_17-26-33.png
 
Last edited:
Interesting recent email exchange between David Keith and Dane Wigington:
https://t.co/cQsDeCNvZj

Intro

The following is a set of emails between Dane Wigington of Geoengineering Watch and David Keith of Harvard University.


The email addresses have been eliminated to reduce the address scraping for automated spam, but both are easy to find. Other than that, it’s an un-edited transcript.


My hope is that some people who are inclined to take the chemtrails story seriously will look at this exchange with one the leading proponent of these claims and think about what the tone and content says about the credibility of Wigington’s claims.


My views on chemtrails are here.


Please note my final comments about the consequences of spreading this disinformation. I routinely get hate filled emails (see examples) and have twice had threats serious enough to warrant calling the police. Spreading hate has consequences.


David Keith – 1 Sept 2016




From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 7:14 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: You appear ever more desperate David


Hello David, your conduct and your public statements of late seem to reflect an increasing desperation on your part. As I am sure you are aware, the damning video of the exchange between you and I at the AAAS geoengineering conference in 2010 continues to circulate and be duplicated. Though you seem to believe you are immune to being fully exposed to the masses for your lead part in the climate engineering coverup, this is not the case. Soon enough the public will see you for what you are David, an accessory to the catastrophic climate engineering crimes. The truth will be fully exposed, wait and see.

Dane


From: David Keith

Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 12:39 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


In what way was the exchange you filmed damning of me?


Was there any way in which it supported the destructive and hateful material you promote?


David


David Keith

Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS); and, Professor of Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 11:20 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


David, what I support is the full disclosure of the truth. What you support, promote, and propagate is the criminal coverup of the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare assault which is irreparably harming the climate system, human health, and the planet's ability to support life as a whole. Yes, countless forms of anthropogenic activity have indeed decimated the planet. This being said, the SRM "mitigation" that you have participated in hiding from the public is mathematically the most destructive anthropogenic activity of all. The truth will be exposed David, as will your part in trying to hide it.

Dane

From: David Keith

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:18 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


I asked a simple question. You dodged it. If you support disclosure of the truth, how about starting by answering my question?


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:03 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


David, I did answer your question, but you are simply unwilling (or unable) to acknowledge this (and countless other facts). Whatever your reason or motive for playing the primary part in the criminal deception of the public in regard to the ongoing climate engineering assault, the population is indeed rapidly waking up to who, and what you are. I will personally do everything in my power to continue to accelerate the public awakening, you can count on that David. Do you really believe a fully awakened population will not hold you legally and morally responsible for your actions?


From: David Keith

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:05 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


Where was the answer to “In what way was the exchange you filmed damning of me”?


Nothing in your email referred to the specifics of the video clip.


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:24 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


I did not realize your question only referred to your statements from the AAAS conference (recorded on film for the world to continue seeing and waking up to). Truly, I can't imagine you are even serious about such a question. In regard to you and your statements on the record, the entire video of the exchange is shocking and damning ( I can't imagine this is not clear to you). Stay tuned, the video of your AAAS statements may soon be shown in a court of law as our legal team pushes forward.

FYI, (in case you want to view the video again)


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qEBZAE0rbs



From: David Keith

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 9:29 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


Again, an answer that provides more fluff but mothering that answers the question I asked. You say “I can't imagine you are even serious about such a question”. Let’s assume I am serious.


Can you answer?


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:46 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Certainly David, lets start with this statement you made in regard to your proposal of dumping 10 to 20 megatons of alumina nano particles into the atmosphere "its not really a moral hazard, more like free riding on our grandchildren".


As the saying goes,"there are non so blind as those who refuse to see"


Truly, if you can't see the gravity of your statements David, your are indeed willfully blind. I don't believe the public will care why you have played such a part, I believe they will look at your actions from a legal and moral perspective. Time will soon enough tell all. I will continue in my efforts to expose the truth in every peaceful and legal way possible.

Dane


From: David Keith

Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 1:21 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


One of the biggest concern that most folks have is that if geoengineering were implemented to reduce the long-run risks of CO2 emissions it might reduce the incentive to cut emissions since people might (wrongly) believe that the climate change problem was totally solved by solar geoengineering. This concern is often called “moral hazard”, I was arguing, perhaps a bit pedantically, that it should more properly be thought of as “free riding” on distant generations in the sense that if we did solar geoengineering and did not cut emissions our emissions would be passing costs on to them, cost that we did not pay.


As is clear from the context, “moral hazard” and “free riding” are technical terms from economics that I used to discuss possible implications of solar geoengineering—if it was every deployed—on people’s efforts to cut emissions of carbon dioxide.


As Wikipedia puts it: “In economics, moral hazard occurs when one person takes more risks because someone else bears the cost of those risks”, seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_hazard.


And, “In economics, the free rider problem occurs when those who benefit from resources, goods, or services do not pay for them, which results in an under-provision of those goods or services”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_rider_problem


Either way you say it these are legitimate concerns that discussion or implementation of solar geoengineering could reduce efforts to cut CO2 emissions. The distinction between the two is a bit nerdy, but I don't see anything wrong with it.


Can you spell out exactly what you think I am saying that's wrong?


Perhaps the biggest difference in our views the world seems to be that you believe that some large-scale activity is already happening in that it's kept secret. If there was a large-scale secret program it that would be a horrific fact, but how does my nerdy statement about possible implications of solar geoengineering relate to your concerns about some secret program?


You say you want truth -- then stand up for it.


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 6:41 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Yes, David, standing up for the truth, I assure you I will do exactly that until my last breath. The wave of awareness is building by the day, the light will yet shine on the deception and cover up. Truly, I can't imagine how you can face your own image in the mirror David, or how you can rationalize your part in the cover up of the ongoing climate engineering atrocities that are occurring in our skies.

Dane


From: David Keith

Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 11:47 AM

To: Dane Wigington

Subject: RE: You appear ever more desperate David


Dane


“The wave of awareness is building by the day, the light will yet shine on the deception and cover up. Truly, I can't imagine how you can face your own image in the mirror David, or how you can rationalize your part in the cover up of the ongoing climate engineering atrocities that are occurring in our skies.”


I note that this does nothing to respond my email about the about the moral hazard quote you claimed damming, and contains nothing that in any way supports your viewpoint, it simply restates same kind of grand yet vague language about “cover-up” and “deception”.


Is it possible you have nothing more serious to offer?


Suppose our positions were reversed. Suppose I publicly asserted that you were really an malignant alien from Gliese 581g, and that made public statements that I could reasonably expect would encouraged hateful or even violent behavior against you. Yet, when you protested and offered evidence as to your humanity, I refused to acknowledge any arguments but simply repeated innuendo saying “the light will yet shine on the deception and cover up. Truly, I can't imagine how you can face your own image in the mirror”.


Think about it. Take a look in the mirror.


David


From: Dane Wigington

Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:58 PM

To: David Keith

Subject: Re: You appear ever more desperate David


Interesting line of rationalization to try and justify the part you have played in the criminal cover up of the climate engineering atrocities, David. Do you think the public will buy it when they fully awaken to what has been done to them and to who lied to hide weather warfare crimes? I think not, we will soon enough find out, the wake up is coming.

Dane


Dane apparently has great difficulties understanding David Keith's question "In what way was the exchange you filmed damning of me?"

Instead Dane just keeps repeating "The truth will be exposed, you will be held responsible" etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top