ATS defines Tanker enemy as HOAX

ATS Mods announce Tanker enemy is a purveyor of hoaxes ....and the reaction is worth pulling up a chair and breaking out the popcorn for!

Do you think they could do the same for videos of chemtrails that don't come with a lab analysis of a sample taken from the trail?

They have a fairly high threshold for putting something into their hoax bin automatically - AFAIK there are only 3 such sources - Sorcha Faal, Before its News, and now TE.

Perhaps if someone like PeeKay22 was more popular on there then he might be a candidate, but I suspect that "occasional" videos aren't going to make the "cut"

MikeC said:

They have a fairly high threshold for putting something into their hoax bin automatically - AFAIK there are only 3 such sources - Sorcha Faal, Before its News, and now TE.

Perhaps if someone like PeeKay22 was more popular on there then he might be a candidate, but I suspect that "occasional" videos aren't going to make the "cut"

Click to expand...

What I find most interesting is the sense of panic in some of the posters messages and their inability to grasp a clear statement of policy by the moderator.

Yes it is fascinating - although IMO not surprising given the nature of the topic and beliefs about it!

Oh, I think they grasp it well enough. Panic is indeed the correct word. Dane Wigington was recently asked about how to deal with evidence for his claims about chemtrails. He quickly waved his hand and said we have video of the nozzles, that is all you need. He and many others have pinned their highest hopes on that video simply because it told them what they wanted to hear. Never mind you can see the ice crystals forming over the top of the wing, not coming from the flap track fairings outboard of the engines. They see what they want to see and read what they want to hear, and bingo, everything is tied up nicely in their minds. Mick told Dane directly about that video three months ago in August, he had absolutely no idea what aerodynamic contrails were, as if e had never heard of them before. He will likely still be claiming they are nozzles come next year and the year after. To admit that he was hoaxed opens a can of worms, and these folks in a panic have looked into the can at that wriggling mass in revulsion.

Everybody knows.

There's Jay's detailed description of Dane's commitment to this video here:
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/de...odynamic-contrails-as-proof-of-spraying.2250/