AE911 Letter to Inspector General Claims NIST WTC7 Report is Provably False

Cube Radio said:

Again, the fact that the NIST computer animation is stopped long before it could reach the point in the collapse where it might model the period of freefall acceleration in the total destruction of the building is indisputable. If you choose to deny that this part of the collapse has not been a focus of particular interest by reason of the evident period of freefall acceleration, that is your prerogative: it does not, however, alter the fact.

Click to expand...

I have greatly edited my post. Perhaps you'd care to read it again.

Furthermore there is no reason whatsoever to consider the final 5 seconds of a collapse progression that took upwards of three times that long, to be in any way relevant to the cause of this collapse.
AE911T would like to say it is but cannot, and care not to explain how it could be, it would appear. Instead they propose a handwaving argument for some unexplained method of demolition.

As for the actual thread topic, the Pepper letter, AE911T demands a reinvestigation, not a request or suggestion, its a demand. Further to that demand they threaten both legal action and an expose of NIST gross error by unnamed European structural experts.
The conditions for the implementation of those threats have been met, no reinvestigation will be undertaken. So far no AE911T statement has been made as to when these threatened actions will be implemented.
There are conclusions that could be reached using this non reaction by AE911T.
1) Their threats are impotent.
2) Their threats were specious and there never was any plan to attempt to follow through.

If there is a third or fourth feel free to illuminate the thread readership.

Cube Radio said:

Again, the fact that the NIST computer animation is stopped long before it could reach the point in the collapse where it might model the period of freefall acceleration in the total destruction of the building is indisputable. If you choose to deny that this part of the collapse has not been a focus of particular interest by reason of the evident period of freefall acceleration, that is your prerogative: it does not, however, alter the fact.

Click to expand...

This is all off topic. The topic is AE911's letter.

New topics in new threads please.